- Perhaps you can see your unborn children in the eyes of your
beloved, but we'd really rather you not try to make any of them
while you're here. This is not your honeymoon, OK, guys?
Let's not play the Bill Clinton Game here. "Is oral satisfaction
really sex, your honor?". You know darn well that it is. Any time
that you touch anybody in that private, um, reproductive area (is
that inoffensive enough), and you're in public at one of our gatherings,
you're out of line. Sex is not a spectator sport.
We'll be reasonable. This is a clothing optional environment,
and if two people are embracing or one is sitting on the other's
lap, accidental contact may occur. Obviously, that is not what
we are talking about. This is not a Monty Python skit and we are
not going to be running about with rulers to make sure that the
lovers are far enough apart from each others' "naughty bits".
A good guide is to forget that you are skyclad (if you choose to
be), and consider what would be reasonably courteous behavior,
while with a clothed date. It can get passionate, right? But
within limits.
If you're off in a corner, out of sight of the others, as the
rationale for the rule is weakened, we become a lot more relaxed
about this. But we might ask you to leave a sign that people should
knock, first - we'll take a red veil at the entrance as such. Oh,
and don't leave a mess, cleaning supplies are under the kitchen
sink. If we're at my place, no, you may not use my bed.
(Note : At those events at which minors are invited, clothing is
required, and stricter rules apply. Let us not even have
the appearance of impropriety).
To be clear on this - for the most part, yes, our events are
clothing optional. An exception to this comes when the tradition
specifically requires us to make one. If, traditionally, a rite had
to be performed clothed, all who are present must be properly
attired. While we are not aware of any rituals that had to be
performed skyclad, *) if we come across one and decide to do it, one
will have to be skyclad to participate.
However, we should emphasize that there is no requirement for a
member to take part in all or even most of the rituals. If one
feels uncomfortable one may wait outside, or, if all of the
participants are comfortable with the idea, one may wait and watch,
in absolute silence, in a portion of the room declared to be
profane space. Being outside of the sacred space, one would
not, in our view, be violating the ritual requirements. If the
tradition allows and the participants consent, the silent watcher
may cross the line and become a participant, if (s)he should
become comfortable with the idea.
Let us further add that the current membership has no intention
of adding any skyclad rituals to the list of those already mandated
by tradition, even if that list should have 0 entries, as we
suspect is the case, breathless speculations on alt.pagan to the
contrary notwithstanding. (See note).
- No pain, mental or physical. No dominance, no S and M. If you are
feeling the need to be tied up, you might consider setting up a
group of your own, and mentioning it on ReligioRomana.
No bondage gear or anything else of the sort, except maybe on some
costume nights. Clothing may be provocatively elegant, but it must
be in good taste. Nothing dangling out, no pants without seats ...
in fact, how about skipping the visit to Cupid's Treasures on the
way here, altogether?
The sexuality of some is mixed with cruelty. This, to our way of
thinking, goes against what love ideally is about and for, most
of all. The basic human need to have that one person one can
absolutely trust, who would never hurt one. We are not perfect, and
that ideal isn't achievable, but as in all things, we have to try.
In a group devoted to Aphrodite Urania, the goddess of Celestial
love, love and sex take on a religious dimension, and we are
serious about our religion. If you want to live in a way contrary
to the values we would represent, you are free to do so, but
please don't come. The only way we can embrace all value systems
(or lack thereof), and all ways of life - absolutely all, as being
part of us, is to stand for nothing. If we do that, then what's the
point to even having a religion?
- Your fellow party guest is not a toilet. Bodily fluids go where
expected, thank you. We have to clean this place up afterwards.
- Keep expressions of sexual interest within your species, but not
within your family. My name is not Jerry Springer.
- Don't disrupt the proceedings. It'll be a little hard to hold
a discussion of epistemology, if two of us are going at it in the
middle of the discussion - literally. For example.
- One does not "(four letter expletitive referring to intercourse deleted)",
one makes love. There's some nasty emotional
baggage that comes with that particular word, so please don't use
the former as if it were a synonym for the latter, however
fashionable that may be getting, lately. In general, let's try
to scale down the profanity.
Let's move on.
(*) A partial correction :
If one includes Roman festivals (and certainly Roman ritual is
borrowed from, in these notes), the Lupercalia did have to be
performed nearly skyclad, by the male participants, and, in
practice, by the female as well, after a while. A reference is made
to a myth in which the god Faunus, sometimes identified with Pan,
came across Hercules and his sleeping lover, with whom he had traded
garments. Faunus, thinking that he was taking liberties with a
young woman, awoke a greatly annoyed Hercules. Ever since then, the
story goes, a certain degree of nudity has been required of the
participants in the rites of Faunus, in order to avoid similar
embarassing incidents.
On a less whimsical level, the Lupercalia were fertility festivals,
celebrating reproduction, so the nudity makes sense.
But, we are a Hellenic group that borrows details from the Roman
tradition, not a Roman group, and wouldn't necessarily be
celebrating such a festival. I picture us being far likelier to
celebrate St. Valentine's Day, than the Lupercalia. But, of course,
each will decide for herself, what manner of celebration she
desires, as always. (Aside: One might also point out that, at the
time of the writing of these comments, we had intended to be a purely
Hellenic group, and not any sort of Graeco-Roman one. That, like
the Christo-Paganism, came later. Consequently, at the time we
wrote this, we had not overlooked the Lupercalia, we simply had no
reason to concern ourselves with it).