Links

Dad's News

 

Father not permitted to spend time with his own children.

 

The Boys crises in Schools. Women have to held accountable for this disgusting intentional favouritism, most teachers are women. They don't give a damn as long as their "Privilege Princess" gets the benefits.

Fred on the "Destroyed Education of Boys". Women did not invent or build this. Men did.

 

Space Shuttle

 

"disenfranchised fathers had a go at Wimbledon,"

"Men only "borrow" their children"

The War on Fathers

KATHLEEN SWINBOURNE, SOLE PARENTS UNION: It is not about fathers' rights. It is about parental responsibility and children's rights. Another male-hating female determined to deny Fathers access to his own children.

Australian men are avoiding marriage because of the financial ruin marital break-ups bring.

HOMELESS fathers will be able to maintain a relationship with their
children under a new program offering dads short-term accommodation to
get together with the family.

This is ofcourse after these Fathers have been screwed in the Family Court and removed from their homes, from his children and sent out into the wilderness to fend for himself. Their is no support system for Fathers as their is for the "priviliged princess" in Australia.

The Federal Government love bashing Fathers about child and Spousal Support (although they hide that Spousal support term). Father bashing is the new sport. Not one mention about women not paying child support. I wonder why ?

"A Vancouver woman will receive monthly support payments from the ex-husband who cheated on her because the emotional toll of his conduct prevented her returning to the workplace, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Wednesday morning."Laws made in places like Canada, America and England will affect Australian CommonLlaw as well. Treating women as victims or as "Privileged Princesses" will turn women into the most hated sex on the planet. What are these judges thinking ?

 

 

The New Marriage Con-tract.
 
"A woman can, at any time,
dismiss her male partner, without justification, and have that partner imprisoned, if he objects too strongly to his dismissal. (refer new DV laws)
For example, if he raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'domestic violence'.
In any event, a woman can dismiss the man regardless of the circumstances, and at her sole discretion.
She can fire him from his jobs as father and partner, whenever she wishes, no matter how long he has served the family, and even if he has done absolutely nothing wrong.
Further, the woman can insist that the man is evicted from his own house, and never allowed to re-enter it.
She can make him homeless knowing there are no services to help him.
If she has children, a woman may further demand that her sacked partner must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the woman and her children for some considerable time into the future - and this is the case even if her children turn out not to be his."
 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1