The Battle Of Dunbar (1650)
Home The armies

The Prelude
The nine tumultuous years of the English Civil War, actually three separate wars, resulted from a range of factors, economic, constitutional and religious, all inextricably interwoven. At a time when religious differences were more often debated with cannon balls than words, radical leaders with strong held beliefs thought nothing of deciding the issues in battle.

Charles I Charles I, attempting to rule as an absolute monarch, quickly came into conflict with the English Parliament, suspicious of his "Popery" and desire for absolute rule. Likewise, the Scots resented his attempts at reforming their Presbyterian system of religion, formulating the "National Covenant" in 1638 to resist his efforts. The English Parliament and the Scots, therefore, combined to defeat Charles in the first of the English Civil Wars. An attempt by Charles to regain power was crushed by Parliamentarian forces at Preston in August 1648 and he was put on trial for treason.

A simmering resentment had long been developing between the two allies, however. Parliament, in order to gain Scottish support, had promised to implement the Presbyterian church system in England. After Charles' defeat, they had been slow and lackluster in their efforts at implementation. Moreover, the promised payments for keeping the Scottish army in the field had not been forthcoming and the Scots were worried by the religious and social radicalism displayed by Parliament's "New Model Army." The Puritans, in power in England, wished religious tolerance for all Protestants whereas the Kirk Party, the radical religious group in power in Scotland desired to convert England to Presbyterianism. Any deviation from their official church line was considered heresy. The English, for their part, were aggrieved that apart from the Battle of Marsdon Moor, the Scots has contributed little to the war effort.

Charles II Matters came to a head on the 30th January 1649 with the execution of Charles I for "High treason and other high crimes." Subsequently, the monarchy and the House of Lords was abolished and it became a treasonable offense for any Englishman to proclaim Charles' son, Charles Stuart, The Prince of Wales, to be king. While England became a republic, Charles had also been king of Scotland and they had no plans to follow England's lead. Counter revolutionary feelings grew and the Kirk Party saw inviting the Prince of Wales, currently exiled in Holland, to become King of Scotland as a way of securing their position. In return, the new king would have to support the "Covenant" and agree to enforce it in all of his domains. With the defeat of the Marquis of Montrose by the Scots, the last royalist commander in the field, he had no choice but to submit and was crowned Charles II on 5th February 1649.

His real ambition, however, was to regain the English throne with the help of the Scots. Having done so, he would repudiate his pledge on the grounds that it was made under duress. Both the Scots and the English, realizing this, began to gather their forces.

Home The armies
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1