For my latest rants see my new:AYN CLOUTER'S BLOGThe new web log is much more frequently updated, and even has built-in Commenting, so you can lavish praise or nitpick typos. Come on over and join the fun. My Next Book: Jaywalking (August 13)Think about it: why did Jimmy Carter, later to disgrace himself by accepting the Ignoble Prize, get out of his car and walk down the middle of the street at his inauguration? And since this was clearly against the law, why wasn't he arrested for jaywalking? Irrational leftists, unable to do more than fume helplessly about my books, have turned to personal attacks on me (obviously jealousy over my svelte profile) and sideswipes against my titles. One said the logical progression of my series about the crimes of Democrats and liberals (so far: Libel, Sedition, and Lese Majesty) would lead me next to trivial things like jaywalking. On the assumption that anything one of these ranters tries to dismiss as unimportant may be very important indeed, I took another look at this generally ignored offense and found a key to much of Democratic scheming for decades. The book I'm writing now will show how Carter's flaunting of the law went a long step beyond even Andrew Jackson's disgusting opening of the doors of the White House to the unwashed Democratic masses at his own inauguration in 1829. Carter actually violated the rights of the natives of Washington, D.C. in 1977 by blocking traffic. (He did this, with typical Democratic hypocrisy, despite his frequent profession of concern that they should have their own votes in Congress.) Why? This was a symbolic act, sending the message that the leftists are in control of the very streets, and that there is nothing we can do about it. Our right to travel and thereby to trade was forced to wait upon the whim of this faux-Christian hick. But this was only the penultimate step in an insidious campaign which began in the dark days of the 1960's. What do you think "taking it to the streets" really meant? If loyal Americans are trapped in their own homes, unable to move because Democrats are breaking the law with impunity, our very lives are in danger. How would an ambulance get through, if one of us has a heart attack watching this unholy spectacle? How would we go out to our favorite restaurants? Is this just part of their plan for "compulsory simplicity", trying to force us all to do our own cooking at home, probably with vegetarian "health" garbage? After all, no servants could get to our homes to cook or clean if their busses were halted because the streets were occupied. (Carter's final assault on our freedom to move about came with his tyrannical attempt to keep us from driving by restricting gasoline, with total rationing his obvious real goal. This provocation proved too much for even the long-suffering inert public, and they rose up and sent the overreaching power-grasper away to do shoddy construction work for freeloaders.) Those riots in American cities in that dark decade were devastating to our economy. They drove noble entrepreneurs out of poor black neighborhoods where they were trying to help the downtrodden. The real motive of the rioters was to scare the law abiding majority of this country, so that they would cower indoors and give up their God-given rights to cruise about at will. Tell me why none of those countless taxpayer funded "political scientists" have ever done a very simple study to see who was really rioting? Just look up which neighborhoods the riots occured in, then check out the voting history of the people who live there. Even the most cursory glance will show you that these were and are overwhelmingly Democratic areas. That's enough proof for me. Fortunately, the sainted Ronald Reagan rescued us from all that nonsense just in time. But this only set back the Democrats and their evil plan by a couple of decades. They are coming back to seize our streets again. The anti-globalization "rallies" (actually riots) in Seattle and other cities were only practice runs. The leftists have now gotten even more organized with new technology. With cell phones and instant messaging, they are doing hit-and-run assemblages of "flash mobs" that ambush unprepared locations with crowds, then disperse before authorities can arrest these troublemakers. This is nothing short of random domestic terrorism, to create a climate of fear. Who knows when his business will be swamped by enough people to violate the fire code and cause fines and cancellation of insurance? Is this all just a rehearsal for an attempt to have mobs intimidate local election departments so that the Democrats can steal the 2004 Presidential election? Maybe they plan to just fill up the streets around polling places in Republican neighborhoods on election day, so that decent people won't be able to vote? That's just a summary of the new book. I've already been promised a Preface by Bill Bettit, author of The Book of Virtuousness. My book may be delayed by the battle to reclaim the Governorship of California and for sensible Congressional redistricting in Texas, but the truth will come out in time. The streets belong to us, not to liberals!! Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:14:59 EDT: Ayn-- You are not merely brilliant and a great American (and this book promises to be an even greater triumph than your take down of that Commy Pinko FDR), you are also fabulously beautiful. Tell me-- how could a super-babe like you still be single? It says volumes about how liberal cultural elites have decimated what's important in this nation. Best, Sun, 17 Aug 2003 06:29:36 EDT:Hi Ayn, love you, love the site, hate liberals. I found the description of your upcoming Jaywalking book fascinating, but I notice you left out any mention of the insidious Walk/Don't Walk signs. Ever since the criminal FDR gang seized control and instituted their Moscow-directed socialist agenda, the good freedom-loving people of this country have had their God-given cruising rights curtailed by the proliferation of signs paid for with their hard-earned tax dollars telling them when they can and can't walk the streets. Proof, as if more proof were needed, of the commie pinko nature of these signs was provided during the failed presidency of Jimmy Carter, when the words WALK and DON'T WALK were replaced by pictographs of white people being threatened by a HUGE RED HAND. This shows just how low our country had sunk by the 1970s -- they didn't even think they had to hide the nature of their totalitarian plans. It was RIGHT THERE FOR EVERYONE TO SEE!!! And just to show how insidious it all is, even though we've since had three glorious Republican presidents in office, the vast totalitarian behemoth of federal bureaucracy has been able to KEEP THESE SIGNS IN PLACE TO THIS VERY DAY! Ayn, in your upcoming book, I urge you to spread the word about this monstrous threat to the freedom of the American people. Best regards, A CONCERNED AMERICAN [The same person who wrote that comment then sent me the following further message, which no doubt is just as worthy of attention and belief as his first one. I have not checked out for myself his claims about these two companies, and so merely pass on his comments without endorsement, but he provides links which you can start with.--AC]Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:46:57 EDT: Dear Ayn, Think OfficeMarx!! I have a friend who works for an advertising agency in New York, and he recently revealed to me more proof of the insidious reach of liberalism hidden from the public at large. One of his agency's clients is the OfficeMax office supply chain of stores. You wouldn't think that such a fine upstanding representative of free-market capitalism as the OfficeMax company would be involved in any low liberal shenanigans. Well, if you thought so, you'd be WRONG! This just goes to show that NOBODY and NOTHING should be above suspicion. Here is what my advertising friend told me. If you go into any OfficeMax franchise in the country, you'll see posters hanging up with the words THINKING INK? THINK OFFICEMAX with a trail of thought bubbles leading down to a woman's head. [See it HERE. Warning: this doesn't seem to work unless you set your browser to accept cookies from any site. --AC] That is no ordinary woman! That woman is HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON! And the reason OfficeMax has a poster of this depraved, wicked woman IN EVERY STORE IN THE COUNTRY is because OfficeMax is secretly funding the Democratic Party! According to my friend, for every dollar you and I spend buying manila file folders and post-it notes in OfficeMax, the company contributes TWENTY-FIVE CENTS to the Democrats! We all remember the horror that swept this country when it was learned that Proctor & Gamble was secretly supporting the Church of Satan. [This writer says you can read more HERE.] This has the potential to be far worse, because OfficeMax CEO Michael Feuer has been clever enough to hide his nefarious activities from the unwitting dupes who shop in his pinko paradise. Ayn, America needs to be told the terrible truth about OfficeMax! You have never shirked from revealing the awful truth about the liberal menace to the American way of life. Spread the word, Ayn! Shout it from the rooftops! YOU CAN'T DO BUSINESS WITH OFFICEMAX!!!! Best regards, A CONCERNED AMERICAN [I have to say that to me the picture in the ad really does not look like the junior Senator from New York, but I assume that the writer of this email would say that is just more proof of insidious intent, if it was felt necessary to disguise someone before using their picture. P&G has of course long denied any Satanic meaning to the astronomical symbols in their logo, but just because they didn't mean it that way doesn't mean they weren't innocent victims of some vile manipulator. Can't be too careful. In suspicious times of widespread treason, shouldn't the burden of proof of innocence be on the accused? Certainly, "A Concerned American" seems to agree with that.]Back to main page. |
HOME PAGE AYN is pronounced like the german for "one" -- which is proper because the superior individual "one" is all that matters in history, not the "few" and especially not the "many". CLOUTER means one who strikes a heavy blow -- which is proper because I love clouting Democrats, liberals, and other woolly brained bleeding heart lemmings -- and the mealy mouthed compromising moderates who appease them and make their victories possible. (Clouted also means clotted, as when cream goes bad -- good, maybe the cream eating overweight liberals will get clogged arteries and die.) |