Negotiation as A Core Competence

 

Home            

Resume         

White Papers

Presentations

 

Negotiation as a Core Management Competency

                     

By Arun Kottolli

                                                             

Negotiation is an interpersonal decision making process by which two are more people agree how to allocate scarce resources.

Effective negotiation skills are very important for managers, executives and leaders in the business world. There are five key reasons for this:

 

1.                  Dynamic Nature of Business

2.                  Interdependence

3.                  Competition

4.                  Information Age

5.                  Diversity

 

Dynamic Nature of Business

Dynamic nature of business means that people must negotiate and renegotiate their existence in organizations throughout the duration of their career. The advent of decentralized business structures and the absence of hierarchical decision making provide opportunities for managers, but they also pose some daunting challenges. New opportunities mean that people must continually create possibilities, integrate their interests with others, and recognize that there will be competition both within companies and between companies. Managers must be in a near constant mode of negotiating opportunities. Ideally negotiation should be second nature of a manager.

“Negotiation comes into play when people participate in important meetings, get new assignments, head a team, participate in business process and set priorities for their work”

Interdependence

The increasing interdependence of people within organizations both literally and hierarchically, implies that people need to know how to integrate  their interests and work together across business units and functional areas. The increasing  degree of specialization and expertise in business world implies that people are more and more dependent on others. It is naive to assume that other have similar incentives to work together, so managers need to know how to promote their won interests  while simultaneously creating joint value for their organizations. This requires negotiation.

Competition

Business is increasingly competitive. In today’s economy, a few large firms have emerged as dominant players in the biggest markets. The losers are often left with little in the way of a market. Managers have to function as advocates of their products/services and must also recognize that the competition is inevitable between companies and in some cases between units within a given company. Understanding how to navigate this competitive environment is essential for successful negotiation.

Information Age

The information age also provides special opportunities and challenges for the manager as a negotiator. With the ever improving communication technology making it possible to communicate with people anywhere in the world, managers need to be able to negotiate at a moments notice. The ability to determine relevant information from irrelevant information is critical for successful negotiation in the information (overload) age

Diversity

Increasing workplace diversity means that managers need to develop negotiation skills that can be applied across cultures. The challenge is to develop a negotiation skill set which is general enough to be used across different contexts, groups and continents, but specialized enough to provide meaningful behavioral strategies in any given situation.

Major sins of Negotiation

 

1.                  Leaving money on the table

            Occurs when negotiators fail to recognize and exploit win-win potential.

2.                  Stettling for too little

                  Occurs when negotiators make too-large concessions resulting in a too small share of the bargaining pie.

3.                  Walking away from the table

            Occurs when negotiators reject terms offered by the other party that are demonstrably better than any other option available to them.

4.                  Settling for terms that are worse than your alternative

                  Occurs when negotiators feel obligated to reach agreement even when the settlement terms are not as good as their other alternatives.

      

Why are people ineffective Negotiators?

Many a times a lose-lose outcomes, Win-Lose outcomes or walking away from the table, raises the question of why people are not more effective at the bargaining table if negotiation is indeed critical for business success. The reason is not due to a lack of motivation or lack of intelligence on the part of negotiators. Many managers fail because they fall victim to the major sins of negotiation: Absence of feedback, Satisficing and Self-reinforcement.

Absence of Relevant Feedback & Diagnostic Feedback

Most people have little opportunity to learn how to negotiate effectively. The problem is due to lack of timely and accurate feedback. Even those people who have daily experience in negotiation receive very little feedback on their negotiating effectiveness. The absence of feedback  results in two problems: Confirmation Bias & Egocentrism.

Confirmation Bias i.e. the tendency to see what they want to see when apprising their own performance. Confirmation bias leads people to selectively seek information that confirms what they believe is true. This results in a myopic view of reality and hinders learning.

Egocentrism i.e. the tendency for people to view their experiences in a way that is flattering or fulfilling for themselves. This may increase their self-esteem; However in the long run, it prevents them from learning from their experiences.

Satisficing

Satisficing is the opposite of optimizing. Its is when people settle for something less than they could otherwise have. Over the long run, satisficing can do a disservice because a lot of possible gains has been given away.

Self-Reinforcement

Self-reinforcement is the reluctance to try out something new or change certain behavior because of the risks associated with experimentation. In short fear of losing prevents them from negotiating effectively.

Myths of Negotiations

Myth -1 : Good Negotiators are Born

Most excellent negotiators are self-made. The myth of naturally gifted negotiators is based on selective memory. ie people remember their success and forget their mistakes. In reality effective negotiations requires practice and feedback.

Myth -2 : Experience is a Great Teacher

Its only partially true that experience can improve negotiation skills. In fact naive experience is largely ineffective in improving negotiating skills. To understand why, remember that in absence of feedback, its is nearly impossible to improve performance. So without feedback,  one fails to learn from experience. Also people have selective memories of their experiences. People tend to remember their success and not their mistakes or shortcomings. Selective memory may help boost self-confidence but it does little to improve performance. Lastly, Experience does not improve the accuracy of negotiations. People with more experience grow more and more confident but the accuracy of their judgment and effectiveness of their behavior does not increase in a commensurate fashion.

Myth -3 : Good Negotiators Takes Risks

Tough negotiations like “This is my final offer” “Take it or Leave it” or using threats and bluffs are seen as taking risks. This tough negotiations are rarely effective. More often than not, such hard ball tactics will leave the opposite party enraged and might toughen their stand making it impossible to negotiate.

Myth - 4 : Good Negotiators rely on Intuition

Many seasoned negotiators believe that their negotiation style involves a lot of “Gut feeling” or Intuitive responses. Such feeling are primarily due to their own short comings or a reactive response rather than a deliberate plan.  Effective negotiation involves deliberate thought and systematic preparation.

Home  Resume White Papers  Presentations

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws