Further reply to Tom Barton MP, from Kim Bax (mum), sent on the 26th February 2004:-
|
Dear Mark,
Can you please tell Tom that I am not writing to him in his capacity
as Minister - I'm not an idiot, I realise Transport doesn't fall
within Mr. Barton's portfolio. However, he IS the member for
Waterford. As such, he represents (or should do), the interests
of the people of Waterford - and it is in THAT capacity that I am
writing to him.
As I assume Mr. Barton is an intelligent adult (who understands
the above point as clearly as I do), it reflects very poorly on him
that I even have to write those lines.
AGAIN - after an interval of five weeks and one
explicit reminder notice - I find myself putting the initial questions
to Mr. Barton again:-
I would also remind Mr. Barton of the final paragraph in my last email
to him of 29th January 2004:-
"I look forward to some further
correspondence from you - correspondence that (hopefully), does not seek
to avoid reasonable questions - questions which are of key
concern to many members of your electorate (judging from the phone
calls I've received)."
My questions to Mr. Barton of 22nd January
2004 (reproduced above), still stand - and five weeks later, Mr.
Barton has still not answered them. What is it about
seatbelting children that he finds so difficult? Also, doesn't
he want to admit to reading a letter (from Australia's top expert),
that predicts (potentially), 50 dead kids in school bus accident?
Surely to God, he has a responsibility to take a serious look at
that kind of documentation.
Regards - Kim Bax
PS - I will update my website with this correspondence this evening.
|