

| Home | News/Activities | Position Papers/Articles | Statements of Support | Photos | Links | Contact us |
Mt. Kanlaon, Its Myths and Wildlife, Painting by Masaste
|
"Natural Park" is "a relatively large area not materially altered by human activity, where extractive resource uses are not allowed, and maintained to protect outstanding natural and scenic areas of national or international significance for scientific, educational, and recreational use." (Article I. Section 3(f)), Republic Act 9154)
"Protected area" refers to "identified portions of land and water set aside by reason of their unique physical and biological significance, managed to enhance biological diversity and protected against destructive human exploitation (RA 7586, Section 4(b))"
Buffer zones are "identified areas outside the boundaries of and immediately adjacent to designated protected areas pursuant to Section 8 that need special development control in order to avoid or minimize harm to the protected area" (RA 7586, Section 4(c))"
|
![]()
Opposing RA 9154 & the Intrusion of the PNOC-EDC Geothermal Project into Mount Kanlaon Natural Park.
Position Paper of the Coalition to Save Mt. Kanlaon Natural Park
A. Historical Background & Status of the PNOC- EDC Project (part 1)
B. Main Bases of Our Opposition to RA 9154 and the PNOC-EDC Geothermal Project (part 2)
A.
Historical Background & Status of the PNOC- EDC Project
The PNOC-EDC, a newly-privatized corporation, has established a Geothermal
Project in Mt. Kanlaon Natural Park (MKNP) , a vital national patrimony and one
of the country's critical watersheds. Dubbed as the Northern Negros Geothermal
Power Development Project, this project aims to develop and use geothermal
resources in the municipality of Murcia and the city of Bago to supply
electricity to the province of Negros Occidental, Panay Island (as claimed
by the PNOC-EDC), and to augment energy supply in the Visayas grid by generating
80 MW of power (later reduced to a target of 40MW).
The PNOC-EDC project was issued an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)
for exploration by then DENR Secretary Alcala on Dec. 1, 1993 and another ECC
for development by then DENR Sec. Victor Ramos on Dec. 5, 1995.
Earlier than the issuance of said ECCs, however, Mt. Kanlaon was already
considered a "natural park" and an "initial component" of the National
Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) as provided in
RA 7586 or the NIPAS Law. This inclusion was prompted by the
historical and ecological significance of Mt. Kanlaon, which as early as Aug. 8,
1934, had approximately 24,557.60 hectares proclaimed a national park. Prior
coverage by the NIPAS being the case, the pertinent provisions of said law shall
already govern activities within Mt. Kanlaon Park and its immediate areas.
The NIPAS Law (Sec. 14) and its subsequent IRR (Sec. 54, DAO 25 Series of 1992)
disallows energy exploration and other resource extractive activities in natural
parks.
In June 1993, the PNOC-EDC even said on its EIA statement that exploration
within the park is "illegal," citing
PD 705
and shared the information on the proposed categorization of the MKNP as a
natural park under the IPAS program.
On Sept. 26, 1995, two months prior the second ECC for the PNOC- EDC project,
the Mt. Kanlaon Protected Area Management Board (PAMB) approved the
categorization of the MKNP as a "natural park" under the terms of the NIPAS Act.
The Mt. Kanlaon PAMB, which is a site-based policy-making body tasked with
administering the protected area, was organized by the DENR in 1994.
On Feb. 29, 1996, the PNOC-EDC, regardless of the legal infirmities of their
project, issued a letter to the PAMB to exclude 1,850 has. of the park's total
area of 24,557 has. for its geothermal project and classifying it -as a "buffer
or a special use zone". Unfortunately, instead of keeping firm with the
safeguards provided by the NIPAS Law and rejecting outright the PNOC-EDC
proposal, top-level officials of the DENR accommodated it, and threw it to the
PAMB to resolve the issue. On March 11, 1997, the Mt. Kanlaon PAMB approved
the PNOC-EDC proposal to enter the park with conditions despite pending
issues. It is striking to note, however, that only I I of the 41 members of
the PAMB voted to approve the PNOC proposal. Such approval by the PAMB
triggered a spate of protests from NGOs, environmentalist groups, churches and
social movements of the province.
On May 8, 1997, then President Ramos issued Proclamation No. 1005 declaring MKNP
as part of the NIPAS under the category of a natural park. Proc. 1005 also
provides that 1,437 has. of the park shall be allocated and devoted to
geothermal exploration, development, and utilization, and which area shall be
managed as a buffer, special use or any other management zone as may be
determined by the DENR Secretary. Proclamation 1005 was under fire from NGOs
and environmental groups as it violated the NIPAS law because it was worded in
such a way that the geothermal block is within the boundaries of the natural
park. Despite its unconstitutional nature, Proclamation 1005 remains
uncorrected up to now.
In 1998, the PAMB drafted a bill which will declare Mt. Kanlaon as a natural
park, and endorsed it in 1999 to Congress. There was no provision whatsoever
in the bill on the PNOC-EDC project as well as its proposed buffer zone. In
fact, the Draft Bill Committee of the PAMB rejected the proposal of the PNOC-EDC
that its geothermal block within the park be considered a "buffer zone".
Congressman Carlos Cojuangco, (Neg. Occ., 4th District), authored the House
version (HB 9152) while Sen. Robert Jaworski sponsored the Senate measure (SB
2062). Again it is important to note that such bills, which were endorsed by the
PAMB and other local and regional policy bodies (like the Bacolod City Council
and the Regional Development Council, etc.) did not carry anything on the
PNOC-EDC.
On Aug. 9, 2000, the House Committee on the Environmental and Natural
Resources approved HB 9152 without considering the PNOC proposal. Encourage
by this crucial policy gain, NGO members of the PAMB pressed to overhaul the
PAMB's 1997 endorsement. On Aug. 18, 2000, the PAMB, with 17 members voting in
favor, approved a resolution for the review of the 1995 ECC granted to PNOC-EDC
and the PAMB's earlier endorsement of the project.
Such small victories proved short-lived as the PNOC-EDC, then a big government
controlled corporation, harnessed its big guns (i.e, powerful connections within
the executive and legislative branches of government as well as its massive
resources) and mounted an aggressive policy lobby to lock the outcome in its
favor. The NGOs and the PAMB were startled when on Dec. 8, 2000; the House
Committee on the Environment and Natural Resources approved a "substitute
version" of HB 9152 in a meeting in Hda. Balbina (the residence of Cong.
Cojuangco), municipality of Pontevedra, Neg.Occ.
HB 12880, the substitute version, allows the intrusion of the PNOC geothermal
project within the MKNP and carves out 169 hectares of the natural park as
buffer zone. This bill was obviously based on then DENR Sec. Cerilles' 28 June
2000 memo, which stated that the modification ' of the boundaries of
the natural park and the establishment of the geothermal block as buffer zone
appears to be the only legal avenue for the PAMB and DENR to implement the
PAMB's earlier endorsement of the PNOC-EDC project.
In response to this discrepancy, on Dec. 20, 2000,
majority of the members of the PAMB's Advocacy Committee approved a resolution
opposing the substitute version, yet to no avail. On June 10, 2001, Congress
ratified the "substitute version" which now creates a 169-hectare area buffer
zone specifically for the PNOC- EDC project. On Aug. 11, 2001, amid heightened
protests, the "oppressive" Mt. Kanlaon bill, unsigned by President Gloria
Arroyo, lapsed into law.
The passage of
RA 9154 dealt a big setback to the cause of
environmentalism and sustainable development in Negros and the Philippines.
Rather being hailed as a landmark, an environmental measure of great
significance considering that it was the first ever natural park law after the
enactment of the NIPAS Law in 1992, it was greeted with dismay, indignation and
widespread protests. Newly-installed Bishop Vicente Navarra of the Bacolod
Diocese issued a pastoral letter against the law and the PNOC-EDC project. In
late August, 2001, a massive protest rally at the Bacolod City Plaza was
joined by about 10,000 people from the churches, schools, environmentalist
groups, and NGOs. The protests only subsided when then PNOC-EDC chair Sergio
Apostol issued a statement in early Sept. 2001 that PNOC-EDC will no longer
enter the buffer zone. Apostol said that based on their technical assessment
they could already get the targeted MW outside the buffer zone.
Now, more than six years after PNOC-EDC made that promise, it is again pushing
to enter the natural park through the buffer-zone provision of RA 9154. So far
the PNOC-EDC, after years of drilling and millions of pesos in operation costs
and despite its earlier technical appraisals, had only generated a measly 9MW of
power and said that it could only reach its targeted MW by tapping areas within
the buffer zone. Never mind the deplorable fact that so much time and effort and
billions of pesos of public funds have already been expended, not to mention the
wide swathe of environmental destruction, total alteration of the physical
landscape, and irreversible loss of biodiversity that the project has wrought in
Mt. Kanlaon's environs.
The scenario presently unfolding brings more alarm and apprehension with the
recent "privatization' of PNOC-EDC, 60% of which is now owned by a private
multinational entity. While previously the PNOC-EDC entered the MKNP clothed
with the veil of public cover as a government corporation, therefore supposedly
held in check through public scrutiny, at this time, PNOC-EDC can be more
secretive, accountable only to itself. The buffer zone provision which gives
PNOC-EDC a foothold in the natural park; thus, creates a very dangerous
precedent that other big private corporations interested in profit maximization
can use to to extract and exploit with impunity the energy and mineral resources
of Mt. Kanlaon.
Indeed, for all its posturings then as a responsible agent of government, the
PNOC-EDC in its Kanlaon adventure acted more as a corporate bully, seemingly
inured and deaf to citizens' pleas to spare the natural park. It has been
apparently immune to calls of accountability as it continues to ride rough shod
over environmental laws and put into harm's way our national patrimony in its
pursuit of geothermal hegemony.
Next page: The bases of our opposition
Send a statement of support,
comments, materials that could help in the struggle to preserve Mt. Kanlaon
Natural Park.
webmaster's e-mail: [email protected]
yahoogroup: groups.yahoo.com/group/SAVEMTKANLAON
Other websites: http://travelpod.com/member/savekanlaon