Cell lines:
- By immunofluorescence, vimentin was found in the
ER-alpha-negative, keratin-negative,
E-cadherin-negative,
in vitro highly invasive fibroblast-like MDA-MB-231, -435, -436, BT549, Hs578T, and MCF-7/Adr (doxorubicin resistant) breast cancer cell (BCC) lines. It was absent in the
ER-alpha-positive, keratin-positive,
E-cadherin-positive,
ZO-1-positive, in vitro poorly invasive, and epithelioid BT483, MDA-MB-175 and -361, MCF-7, ZR-75-B, T-47D, and BT474 BCC lines (Sommers C.L. et al., 1994a).
- Comparison of vimentin-positive (V+) and vimentin-negative (V-) breast cancer cell lines revealed several potential areas of vimentin gene regulation. Analysis of the chromatin structure of the vimentin gene in V+ and V- breast cancer cells showed DNase I hypersensitive sites in the 5' promoter region in V+ cell lines and 3' to the start of transcription in V- cell lines. Promoter deletion and reporter gene analysis revealed the importance of two adjacent AP-1 sites separated by seven GC-rich nucleotides for vimentin expression in V+ breast cancer cells. Mutational analysis of these sequences showed that although both AP-1 sites could bind nuclear proteins from V+ cells in vitro, one AP-1 site was sufficient to drive transcription in CAT reporter gene assays. The GC-rich spacer region had a modulating function on the activity of the AP-1 sites. In addition, levels of c-jun mRNA were elevated in V+ versus V- cells (Sommers C.L. et al., 1994b).
- BCC lines that express vimentin appeared highly invasive
in vitro and highly metastatic in nude mice in comparison with vimentin-negative cell lines (Pulyaeva H. et al., 1997).
- Overexpression of vimentin in MCF-7 BCC led to augmentation of motility and invasiveness
in vitro. These activities could be transiently down-regulated by vimentin antisense oligonucleotides in vimentin-overexpressing MCF-7 clones and in MDA-MB-231 BCC (which constitutively co-express keratins and vimentin). Furthermore, in the vimentin-overexpressing MCF-7 transfectants exhibiting the highest percentage of vimentin-positive cells, their proliferative capacity, clonogenic potential, and tumorigenicity increased. However, the metastatic ability of the vimentin-overexpressing MCF-7 clones remained unchanged compared with MCF-7neo controls (Hendrix M.J. et al., 1997).
- The phenotypic characteristics of 2 tumor cell lines (BC-H1 and BC-K1) established from bone marrow of patients with breast cancer were studied by immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, and RT-PCR. Both cell lines expressed
E-cadherin, vimentin, cytokeratins (including
component 18), alpha 5-,
alpha V-,
beta 1-, and
beta 3- integrin subunits,
ICAM-1,
MCAM, LFA-3 (CD58), and
CD44s (but not
CD44v5,
v6,
v7/8). BC-H1 also expressed
ErbB2 (not found in BC-K1), and
MAGE-4 (but not MAGE-1, -2, -3/6, -12; BC-K1 was not tested). In both cell lines, the mesenchymal cytoskeleton protein vimentin was coexpressed with cytokeratins CK
8/
18 and CK
8/
19, indicating an epithelial to mesenchymal transition of these micrometastatic cells. The expressed molecules might be potential candidates for novel therapeutic targets (Putz E. et al., 1999).
Tumors:
- Expression of vimentin in human breast cancer is associated with markers of disease aggression such as high grade, low
estrogen receptor status, and high Ki-67 growth fraction (Domagala W. et al., 1990 and 1990b).
- The expression of keratin and vimentin were measured in 54 archival, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded invasive breast cancers from postmenopausal women. Vimentin expression was inversely associated with keratin expression alone (P = 0.0089) and directly related to histological grade (P = 0.017), nuclear grade (P = 0.027), Ki67 growth fraction (P = 0.024), and
epidermal growth factor receptor immunostaining (P = 0.019). The relative expression of keratin and vimentin in approximately similar amounts characterized tumors with the poorest prognosis, as compared with keratin-high/vimentin-negative or keratin-low/vimentin-positive tumors, suggesting that keratin and vimentin intermediate filament (IF) coexpression in breast cancer confers a more aggressive "interconverted" phenotype, expressing both epithelial and mesenchymal markers (Thomas P.A. et al., 1999).