![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|||
|
this presumably because as the action strips could
no longer be done as they were intended, there must have seemed no point
in doing them. The magazine had a strange mix of children's strips
(Scooby Doo and No.73) and features that seemed more aimed at teenagers.
I'd well and truly given up on it by then. |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
going into 93, the strips were
sparse, and consisted of 'Mac' a strip about a teenage boy and his dog,
which was called 'Junkyard'. I had never heard of this and have no
idea if it was based on a series. Likewise 'Justin Gibbs and his
massive fibs' which sounds like it should be in The Beano, 'Chuck Rock'
based on a computer game character, and 'Garfield', (Justin, Chuck and
Garfield, were all one page strips). There was also 'Scooby-Doo'.
Scooby Doo was drawn by Bill Titcombe, the only original artist not to jump ship
before it sank. |
|||
|
although it brought back a lot of happy memories, It was too short. I couldn't help wishing they'd have just published a stand alone magazine on Look-in's history, an opportunity missed, but the plain fact is that Look-in was suffering an identity crisis, it didn't know who it was trying to appeal to. The decision was made to drop the bulk of the strips (only Garfield stayed), and be a teenage mag, changing the name to 'Now!' the following week, Look-in was no more, but I'm not as much sad as relieved, it needed to be done, a bit like putting a favourite pet down when it's really ill - you know it's for the best, but it still leaves you sad and empty.........but you still have the memories. |
![]() |
|||
| PREVIOUS PAGE | HOME | |||
![]() |
||||