Objective Assessment of Image Quality for Estimation and Detection Tasks


We are developing a rigorous evaluation methodology for objective assessment of image quality for lesion detection and activity quantitation tasks.  We have applied our methods to assess the performance of different acquisition (2D vs 3D) and processing methods for variable patient sizes in the context of lesion detection in whole body FDG-PET.  Our results show that for lesion detection and activity quantitation tasks, 3D imaging yielded better lesion detectability than 2D (p<0.025, two-tailed paired t-test) in patients of normal size (Body Mass Index [BMI] ≤ 31).  However 2D imaging yielded better lesion detectability than 3D in large patients (BMI > 31) as 3D performance deteriorated in large patients (p<0.05).  2D and 3D yielded similar results for different lesion sizes.  We are presently extending our work to the assessment of performance of Time of Flight PET and 4D PET.

Related Papers:



Back to top
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1