|
Versions of the
figure proved to be popular and the image was frequently reprinted; however,
perceptual biases started to occur in the image, unbeknownst to the plagerizing
artists and psychologists who were reprinting the images. Variations have
appeared in the literature that unintentionally are biased to favor one
interpretation or another, which defeats its original purpose as a truly
ambiguous figure.
In the three versions shown
above, can you tell which one is biased toward the young girl, the old
woman?
In 1961, J, Botwinick
redesigned this figure once again, and entitled it, "Husband and Father-in-Law."
REFERENCES
Boring, E. G., 1930. "A New Ambiguous Figure,"
American
Journal of Psychology, 42, 444.
Botwinick, J. 1961. "Husband and Father-in-law:
a Reversible Figure," American Journal of Psychology, 74,
312-113.
Fisher, Gerald, 1968. "Mother, Father, and Daughter:
A Three-aspect Ambiguous Figure," American Journal of Psychology,
81,
274-277.
Hill, W. E., 1915. "My Wife and My Mother-in-law,"
Puck,
November 16, 11.
Wright, E., 1992. "The Original of E. G. Boring's
Young Girl/Mother-in-law Drawing and its Relation to the Pattern of a Joke,"
Perception,
21, 273-275.
|
|