Perspectives  401

INTERDISCIPLINARY TOPICS IN EDUCATIONAL PERSPECTIVES:

Examining Culture Through Conversations on the Arts

David Means, Associate Professor, First College

David Revill, Community Faculty, First College

(612) 341-7262 (612) 377-2418 (Means)

(715) 426-9079 (Revill)

Messages: (651) 793-3967 (Nobles)

[email protected]

[email protected]

 

“The audience for everything has grown in size, and the number of experiences to watch has grown even more rapidly. These two factors mean that the nature of the audience must change.  When that occurs, our current standards of excellence need to be rethought and redefined.”

- from Interactive Excellence by Edwin Schlossberg

 

Public performances provide a context for audiences to develop; to engage new ideas presented through performances; to interact with others in defining excellence; and ultimately participate in a broader discussion on the nature of art and creativity in expressing cultural values. Composers David Means and David Revill will lead students in an investigation into the nature of creativity in performance as an instigator of public discourse on the arts, and the specific role of audiences as a conversational medium in which culture may further be defined.  The seven-week accelerated format will coincide with Metro State’s Strange Attractors International Festival of Experimental Intermedia Art, and students will have the opportunity to view these performances while speaking directly with artists involved in the productions.

 

Competence Statement

“Knows the principles and approaches to interdisciplinary study well enough to be able to analyze, interpret and critique an interdisciplinary topic from a range of educational perspectives.”

 

Evaluation

Written critiques and class discussion                   40%

Project outline                                                            20% (due session IV – 11/9)

Final Interdisciplinary Project                                   40% (due session VII – 12/7)                     

 

Accelerated Learning Class Format    

This course consists of seven weekly class sessions and will be reading intensive, with written assignments and a final project expected from each student.  Absences cannot be made up and will detract 1/7 for each un-excused occurrence.

 

Required Texts: 

Interactive Excellence: Defining and Developing New Standards for the Twenty-first Century by Edwin Schlossberg. Ballantine (1998).

Sounding Off: Music as Subversion/Resistance/Revolution. ed. Fred Ho and Ron Sakolsky.

 

 

Weekly Class Outline

 

Part I will introduce interdisciplinary perspectives through the study of critical thinking in cultural contexts applied to the interpretation, analysis and critique public performances. This will lead students to develop an outline for a specific interdisciplinary project, including the questions, materials and resources needed to fully define and implement the project.

 

 

I.          Introductions & Overview of Interdisciplinary Study and Cultural Conversations (Means and Revill)

10/19  What is the nature of interdisciplinary study? How does the study of an interdisciplinary topic reveal larger questions about the nature of learning?  How can extending interdisciplinary connections lead to a deeper level of critical thinking? What is the relationship between content and context? How are cultural values transmitted through works of art in performances?

 

Assignments -

1.  Use the Guidelines to Critiquing Performances to write up a critique of the Deep Narratives Video Band performance at the Strange Attractors Festival.  Make a few short notes during the performance on the Applications for Critical Thinking sheet and type up a 2-3 page paper for submission next week.

2.      Read Ch. 1,2 & 3 from Schlossberg text

3.      Review Articles in Ho and Sakolsky text and select 2-3 chapters for discussion

 

 

II.          Critical and Cultural Theory: The Nature of the Audience (Revill)

10/26  Dialogue and Discussion on performances and the nature of audiences

            Formulating and Refining Issues and Questions

            Defining Issues, topics and Subject Matter: Ho and Sakolsky chapters

            Description, Interpretation and Criticism

Integrating Theoretical Perspectives with Practical Applications of           Interdisciplinary Study

 

Assignments: 

1.  Use the Guidelines to Critiquing Performances to write up a critique of the Morphos performance at the Strange Attractors Festival.  Make a few short notes during the performance on the Applications for Critical Thinking sheet and type up a 2-3 page paper for submission next week.

2        Formulate three key questions, which can engage a response to the performance from various critical perspectives. (Use Integrating Theoretical Perspectives sheet)

3.      Read Ch. 4&5 (pp 34-55) from Schlossberg text.

4.      Select two essays in the Ho and Sakolsky text to compare and contrast in group discussion (Due week VI).

5.   Begin to formulate your Final Project Outline (see Guidelines to Final Project Outline)

 

III.         Communication and Conversations: Interpreting Cultural Content and Assumptions (Means)

11/2    A Conversation with Johnny Rodriguez

Formulating Projects as Cultural Experiments (Mediating Venue and Reception)

 

Assignments:

1.  Use the Guidelines to Critiquing Performances to write up a critique of Johnny Rodriguez performance at the Strange Attractors Festival.  Make a few short notes during the performance on the Applications for Critical Thinking sheet and type up a 2-3 page paper for submission next week.

  1. Read Ch. 6 & 7 (pp 56-98) from Schlossberg text
  2. Prepare your Final Project Outline (due session IV 11/9)

 

 

IV.        Interdisciplinary Perspectives: Analyzing Methods and Approaches (Means)

11/9    Due: Project Outlines

Assumptions and the Reasoning Process

A Conversation with Starri Hedges

 

Assignments:

1.  Use the Guidelines to Critiquing Performances to write up a critique of the Psycick Slutz performance at the Strange Attractors Festival.  Make a few short notes during the performance on the Applications for Critical Thinking sheet and type up a 2-3 page paper for submission next week.

           

 

Part II will examine the problems and methods used to complete the interdisciplinary projects and critique the intellectual process used to evaluate broader cultural considerations, resulting in the presentations of final interdisciplinary projects.

 

V.        Critical and Cultural Perspectives: Gathering and Interpreting Evidence (Means)

11/16  Myth, Ritual and Solo Performance           

 

Assignments:

1.  Use the Guidelines to Critiquing Performances to write up a critique of the Heidi Arneson performance at the Strange Attractors Festival.  Make a few short notes during the performance on the Applications for Critical Thinking sheet and type up a 2-3 page paper for submission next week.

 

 

VI.       Critiquing the Process: Evaluating Evidence; Defining Boundaries & Intersections (Revill)

11/30  Either/Or vs, Both/And

            Group Discussion of Ho and Sakolsky Essays

 

Assignments:

1.                  Complete final projects

 

 

VII.       Project Presentations and Class Feedback (Revill and Means)

12/7    Fill out Instructional Improvement Questionnaires

 

 

 

 

Assignment Worksheets and Guidelines:

 

 

Applications for Critical Thinking

for

Examining Creative and Cultural Content

of Public Performances

 

I.                  Description

List five creative and cultural aspects of this performance:

Creative Elements                                            Cultural Elements

1.                                                                           1.

 

2.                                                                           2.

 

3.                                                                           3.

 

4.                                                                           4.

 

5.                                                                           5.

 

 

 

II.               Interpretation

How are these elements related?

                             To each other?

                                          Similarities

 

                                          Differences

 

                              To other performances?

 

 

                             To a theme, issue or larger concept?

                             

 

III.  Criticism

 

What are the cultural implications of these larger concepts and the significance of their interdisciplinary connections to -

                              The artists/writers/creators?

 

The reader/viewer/listener?

 

Communities and Society?

 

 

 

Guidelines to Critiquing Performances

Perspectives 401

Examining Culture Through Conversations on the Arts

 

 

I.                  Description

 

Describe the performance and its creative and cultural elements.  List the most important interdisciplinary, artistic and social aspects and elements of the performance in terms of their relevant cultural materials.  What expectation did you have at the outset of the performance regarding your anticipation of artistic and cultural elements?

 

 

II.               Interpretation

 

What questions best frame the cultural nature of this performance?

 

Analyze the creative and cultural content of this performance in terms of your past experience as an audience member of similar or related performances. 

 

How do the creative and cultural elements relate to one another and to the larger society in which the performance is presented?

 

What cultural assumptions are you relying upon to form the basis of your interpretation?

 

 

III.  Criticism

How would you evaluate the quality of the performance?

   In terms of the creative content of performance materials?

  In terms of the cultural context expressed in the performance?

 

How would you evaluate the reception and impact of the performance?

-by the audience?

-by your classmates?

-by your own preferences and aesthetic values

 

How has your critique of the performance challenged the assumptions you had?

 

What changes in your critical thinking have taken place as a result of attending this performance?

 

 

Guidelines to Final Project Outline

Perspectives 401

Examining Culture through Conversations on the Arts

 

 

I.      Description

 

Describe your project and its interdisciplinary elements.  List the most important interdisciplinary, artistic and cultural aspects and elements of the project in terms of their relevant materials.

 

 

 

II.   Interpretation

 

Describe the process of undertaking this project, complete with timeline, interim objectives and the ultimate venue for presenting your project.

 

What questions best frame the cultural nature of your project?

 

Analyze the relevant methods of inquiry or creative investigation you plan to use in this project.  How will these methods allow you to compare, contrast and interpret the information needed to address the questions raised by your project?

 

What assumptions are you relying upon to form the basis of your interpretation of materials?

 

 

III. Criticism

 

How do you envision your project’s reception and impact?

-         by the instructor?

-         by other class members?

-         by the general public?

 

 

Edwin Schlossberg:  Interactive Excellence

Defining and Developing

New Standards

For the

Twenty-first Century

 

 

 

1.            Educating the Audience – and the Artist

 

 

 

 

2.            Changes in Technology Create New Audiences

 

 

 

 

3.            Standards of Excellence Reveal the Nature of the Audience

 

 

 

 

4.            The Tools of Communications Change the Conversation

 

 

 

 

5.            New Standards of Excellence are Needed

 

 

 

 

6.            Museums and Public Places Provide a Context for Audiences to Develop

 

 

 

 

7.            Interacting in the Audience Creates the Possibility of True Excellence

 

Return to Nobles Classes Page

 

 

           

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1