Why It Just May Be Good To Be Carrie Underwood

 

So, Carrie Underwood is your American Idol- now what?

Now that the dust has settled, the final Idol hopes (Bo Bice’s) has been dashed and the final confetti cleared (well, maybe it’s still there…this is Los Angeles after all), Checotah, Oklahoma’s Underwood now has that thorny question to wrestle with in the days ahead. She has a winner single- the surprisingly moving “Inside Your Heaven”- coming out on June 14, and a tour that just went underway with the other eleven American Idol finalists, but after that, she has to get moving to get that album in while everyone still knows her name.

In 19 Media’s (the company behind the whole “Idol” series) perfect world, as soon as the Idol is crowned they would become a massive star, with the resulting fame, glamour, platinum records and money-grabbing opportunist lawsuits that come with it, but the truth is that, ever since Burleson, Texas’ Kelly Clarkson walked away with the first ever American Idol title in 2002 (yeah, it’s only been three years…feels longer, doesn’t it?), none of the so-bestowed “winners” of American Idol have ever hit it big on a grand scale- both Ruben Studdard’s “Soulful” and Fantasia Barrino’s “Free Yourself” have proven to be massive commercial failures (Studdard’s with good reason…), as well as the releases of second-place finishers Justin Guarini (a self-titled album that deserved to do better than it did) and Diana Degarmo (“Blue Skies”), with the only other real star emerging from the “Idol” fold being North Carolina’s Clay Aiken, the second-place finisher to Studdard in Season 2 (his “Measure Of A Man” did better than it should have in my opinion, but at least the guy does have charm). Thus, while Underwood’s fans are celebrating their hopeful’s victory, given the previous performances of the other Idol winners it shouldn’t be surprising if some of them are genuinely worried about commercial success, if not Fox, 19 Media and Underwood as well.

However, there are a few reasons why Underwood’s chances are not as slim as her predecessors were in years past. First of all, there are signs that popular culture is being over saturated with the party-rap trend that has been going on since 2003- none of the “bling-bling” rappers (save 50 Cent) that have appeared in the past few years have really ever become bona fide stars, and the superstars that were supposed to carry mainstream rap as a whole- Eminem and 50 Cent- both released sub-par efforts over the past year. In fact, mainstream rap’s fortunes have gotten so bad that the newest “star” they found- Ciara- needs other artists in her songs to even give them chart-life. Also, artists like Fat Joe and Ludacris, bona fide stars in hip-hop circles, have failed to really make much of a dent in the mainstream on a whole, only remaining stars on the urban circuit. The torch of popular culture that was passed onto rap has been passed around so much that it may just be itching to leave it entirely.

Secondly, the superstardom of Avril Lavigne- the only genuinely new superstar in popular music over the past few years- shows that pop music can still produce artists that will gain the greater attention of the public as a whole, because- whether you think it’s real or not- her rambunctious spirit has managed to captivate pop culture as a whole, and, with the emotion-bearing moments in the more methodical “Under My Skin”, she’s shown that she does have a bit of depth to her character and isn’t just some “wild-child act”. Her persona is even contrasted by that of Clarkson’s- pop music’s only “other” star- who isn’t the bombastic type that Lavigne is but has enough of an edge that she gets noticed. Admittedly, Clarkson has been quieter than Lavigne in her success, but their stardom provides hope that other pop music artists- like Underwood- do have a chance to become stars on their own accord.

Thirdly, the Backstreet Boys are coming back, and their clout may just get people talking about pop music again. It is through their momentum that Underwood has to take hold, ride it through and create her own success out of it, although I question the reasoning behind releasing her single the same day that BSB release their album, but there’s nothing she can do about that right now. Timing is everything when it comes to success, and she couldn’t have emerged with a more established act in her coattails than BSB. Of course, if “Never Gone” flops then we may be back at square one all over again, but for now, she’s emerging just when pop music as a whole is gaining a little bit more buzz.

Fourthly, Underwood has the potential to be a crossover artist in both pop and country, where her musical leanings lie. Country may have always been its own separate musical field when it comes to the general music world, but country has its fair share of stars in the likes of individuals like Toby Keith, Dierks Bentley, Shania Twain, Tim McGraw, Big & Rich, Gretchen Wilson, etc., who (like them or not), and thus, while it may seem like Underwood would be entering a genre that’s overcrowded with stars, the truth is that country is always open to new stars and if she can break out in country she’d be able to use it as a stepping-stone to break out in the pop music world. Furthermore, Josh Gracin from Season 2 has managed some country success, so it wouldn’t be that farfetched to expect the same from Underwood.

Of course, Underwood has to ensure- like the other pop stars before her- that she’s capable of becoming someone that the masses will care about, because without that, her career will fade just as quickly as Barrino’s and Studdard’s did. Her obstacles are the same that’s been plaguing pop music as a whole for years- besides Lavigne and to a lesser extent, Clarkson, pop music has failed to produce anyone in the past few years that has captured the imagination of popular culture as a whole. The reason for this is that pop acts- most of them singer/songwriters- have become too obsessed lately with attempting to be “real” that most of them never focused on being something that the greater masses would “want” to care about. It’s good that they’re attempting to be deep and show that they’re “people” and not larger-than-life demigods (for the lack of a better term), but most of them showed themselves as just as one-note as the “fake” acts they were replacing, with their musings very rarely ever being distinct, really relatable or at least delivered with the kind of imprint that would allow someone to say “they’re really different”. Really, there are only so many same-y love songs you can listen to before you start thinking “do they ever think of anything else?” Just like the boy bands before them, you wondered if there were any distinct personalities in there or if they were really just all in the same.

Now, this has more to with Underwood than you might think, because American Idol is the glorification of the act of taking someone who’s “normal” and making them a “star”, like many of the pop acts that have appeared of late, and, like those acts, the Idol winners have had problems really showing how “different” they are than the rest of music world. I mean, Studdard may have shown himself to be distinct by being a loveable soul man in Season 2, but once he entered the music world directly, no one really saw him as anything more than another Babyface knockoff. Barrino was a captivating performer in Season 3, being the kind of person you remembered even if you didn’t like them, but her post-Idol offerings haven’t been anything more than Macy Gray-reject records. The trends point to what really bothers Idol (for anyone who thinks “Idol” winners don’t work hard like their rock band buddies, all I have to say is that you just haven’t watched the show), and that is the inability of its winners to prove that they’re capable of being “different” outside of their Idol contexts. They don’t necessarily have to turn to flash to sell albums- they can use their voices (which is what got them to “Idol” in the first place) to present their personalities in the way they sing their songs, and they can make sure that the songs they do record do at least “feel” like it’s their own, which is tricky. Underwood won raves because of her voice and her role as an “innocent farmer girl looking to make it big”, but it’s important that when she does release a commercial album that she comes off as “Carrie Underwood” and not some retread like Barrino and Studdard. She has the potential to either follow her own idol Martina McBride’s career path and use her voice to captivate people (which is what she was able to do on “Idol”) or she could become just another innocent girl from a farm, of which we have too many of those. With the release of BSB’s “Never Gone”, Clarkson’s continuing superstardom and her leanings towards the star-studded country, the pieces are there for widespread commercial success. Now she just has to put them together.

 

-DG

 

Back Home

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1