The Bone Collector
Directed by Phillip Noyce
Starring Denzel Washington, Angelina Jolie, Michael Rooker, Ed O’Neill, Mike
McGlone, Luis Guzman and Queen Latifah.
playing at theaters accessible to everyone - ie - multiplexes.
(available on video)
*    (one star)

no time to read the whole review?
THE JIST of MY PROSE
If 'The Sixth Sense' was 'a thriller that actually thrills' (Lisa Schwatzbaum, EW) - then 'The Bone Collector' is a thriller that can't seem to thrill no matter what old school methods it meanders through. Denzel and Jolie walk through their roles while all the supporting players resemble window dressing - boring to me and uttery out of focus. Finally, if there's a more hilarious thing that doesn't belong in the anti-climatic "suspense" (ha!) sequences, it's the digitally rendered rat. Very, very bad.


Mike McGlone, who was a bad romantic lead in ‘She’s the One’ and ‘The
 Brothers McMullen’ and a bad (really, really bad) gangster lead in ‘One Tough
 Cop’ - - is a detective’s lacky in ‘The Bone Collector’. And yet, ‘The
 Bone Collector’ turns out to be very much at home for McGlone. This is the
 kind of film you’d have expected as a straight-to-video release hidden among
 the real movies on your video rental palace’s shelves. And it would be a
 perfect straight-to-video release film without Denzel Washinton and Angelina
 Jolie. It’s a film that’s straining it’s muscles in a desperate attempt to be
 credible and original at the same time - - and failing miserably in turn.

 And it’s not vague at all that ‘The Bone Collector’ is essentially a
 paycheck for all involved.

 It carries in stride a couple of obvious cliches that we expect from
 Hollywood thrillers nowadays (the superhumanencyclopedic brain of Washington,
Amelia’s deep dark secret and certainly, the archetypical camaraderie of archetypical
cop characters). But all of these distractions I take in stride. Instead, I
 was really disappointed to see director Phillip Noyce take what could easily
 have been a mediocre thriller with some nail-biting setpieces and turn it
 into a really, really boring and repetitious collection of anti-climatic, three-dimensional
crime scene photos. Jolie plays Amelia, a beat cop solicited by Lincoln Rhyme
(Washinton) into assisting with a case involving a serial killer who leaves countless clues
at the scene. The  kickers : predictably, Jolie wants nothing to do with it and Washington,
in what must have looked really enticing to the actor on the page, spends the duration of
the film bedridden by a nasty accident that befalls him in the opening moments. He can
move only his head, shoulders (knees and toes! Knees and toes!) and one finger.

 The film is so assuming and so thinly written, it’s the kind of movie that
 would usually rely soley on it’s shocks and it’s kinetic editing to thrill you.
But you can cross that off your list straightaway - the thrill is gone. Every time Amelia
 attempts to throw her inexperienced self  into the dark, uncertain crime
 scenes, Noyce turns up the music and cuts back to Lincoln, grilling it over,
 lying in his bed - - leaving any intensity the film could hope to garner dead in the water.
When you do realize you’ve been had by the somewhat generic filmmaking techniques,
you’ll  also find it irritating that the film’s one attempt at uniqueness fails
 miserably. The killer is attempting to share the responsibility with the cops
 by leaving clues that they must decipher in a certain amount of time or - -
 whoops, dead victim (except children, a studio/multiplex no-no). Hey, anybody
 recall that very technique from a certain film whose title is also a number?

 Here’s a list of other silly stuff: The purposefully enigmatic pseudo-romance
 between Washington (especially when he’s comatose after a stroke at one
 point); constant cutaways to Lincoln (who hoards a ransom of high tech
 gadgets in his apartment) as Amelia investigates crime scenes and speaks to
 him through a microphone (Simply solution : Use a remote video transmission.
 Plenty of possibilities there); and who could forget the computer generated
 rat that lunges at one of the victims - - a classic shot that culls a classic
 unintentional laugh from me.

The film attempts so much. Washington and Jolie are especially muted and
Rooker, O’Neil and Guzman are mere window dressing. The ambience of dusty,
run-down New York settings, most of them dark and underground is continually
suffocated by the film’s obvious audience-pleasing clumsiness. And while I’d really like
be polite, to close my eyes and put two and two together; sit tongue bitten and take the
generous helping of patronizing the film is content to give me - - that just seems
somewhat impossible. ‘The Bone Collector’ is too awful not to warrant a cheap thrill,
on my part, in the verbal deconstruction of it’s expert crappiness.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1