'Any Given Sunday', apart from having nearly 7 storylines that it fails
to develop,
make interesting or complete - is a boring, slow-moving film.
Any scene that's not on a football field (and some that are - they get
pretty ordinary
and repetitive just like real football) is just plain bad. The dialogue
is so front-loaded
with melodrama - I almost need a spoon to dig through what they're
saying to get to the
root of the scene : how it fits, why it's placed where it is and why
it's being interrupted by
another scene that's equally as boring. Example : Why would you intercut
a scene of
Jamie Foxx being interviewed by John C. McGinley (totally an expository
scene meant to
push the race issue) with a scene of Pacino with a hooker (played by
Elizabeth Berkeley -
there to be nude and nothing else). What is this meant to suggest?
And dig the nifty,
unexplained manner in which Pacino ends up with a hooker : he
turns her down one
night (citing morals) and picks her up the following night. Nothing
has occurred to make
me believe that one night he’d be high and mighty about soliciting
paid sex and the next
night he’d arrange for it as if calling for room service.
There's about four times the music in this film than the average
film. It's as if Oliver
Stone came to my house, did some drugs (which I now associate with
Stone) and
then hooked my VCR to my discman (like I used to do - with the bottle-neck
cables) and
put random pump-up tunes over shots of football. So much of it seems
so out of place,
thrown together - and why is the music fragmented? (My guess is to
include more of it.)
(Nice choices like “Believe” from 'Run Lola Run', “Right Here, Right
Now” enacted with
energy courtesy of Fatboy Slim and especially "Leave Home" by the Chemical
Brothers.
Another beef in the music. I hate the song "Bawitaba” by Kid Rock -
it makes me
uncomfortable because it's so raw with it's masculinity (how terribly
appropriate here in a
film about pigskin machismo). I acknowledge it’s dynamic in that propaganda-laced
trailer. In the film, it’s totally wasted. Not used to garner energy
or to complement what's
onscreen. Just buzzing up there against the grain of the images. (Reminds
me of a
complaint I had heard from Michael J. Wall with 'Casino' that the music
was irritating when the complainer was trying to watch the movie.)
No one is spared, really. Charleton Heston - don't blink or you'll miss him - no, wait - blink. Blink alot. Come with a blanket and put it over your eyes.
Focus is stressed so heavily in the film. Why doesn't it take it's own
advice and
make a film that's only about one of the following: a) feuding orthopedists;
b) a faded
coach; c) a no-bullshit femme owner in a man's world; d) racism in
football; e) rivalry
inside a team; f) player's choosing glory over health, etc. I’d have
gladly watched a two
hour film about James Woods and Matthew Modine fighting over whether
or not it was
right to let a player choose to play injured, each playing seniority
vs. ethics as if it were a
strategic game of chess.
This muddled migraine of a film - I’ll not watch.
"Cameraman : 'We dropped the camera!'
Oliver Stone : 'No - no - keep it - it's art!' "
-Edward M. Prigge, totally on the mark regarding the annoying
cinematography that Oliver Stone has included in this banal piece of "art".