From my considerable first hand photographic expertise, as with owning several 5X7 70mm format cameras, accomplishing film developing and personally enlarging/printing those images of nearly everything from A to Z, there's simply no way in hell those lunar surfaces were as depicted from those Apollo missions.

Unfortunately, this lunar subject is so grand and as such being so perverted by the powers that be, that no one page nor chapter nor any simple volume of books is going to achieve nor accomplish justice. Basically folks, you and I have been snookered out of trillions of bucks and we've been lied to and subsequently nearly every fiber of associated history has been skewed into the toilet.

1) The surface reflective index, as so easily compared to those white moon-suits, was nowhere sufficiently dark as to be representing any 10% average reflection. Nowhere in any of the Apollo images was there ever an area that matched "new asphalt" as would have been necessary as for representing the 10% factor. In fact, the vast majority of lunar surface was depicted as more like near to or above 50% and of other dark areas were well above 25%. If necessary, I can deliver another solid chapter, just on illumination factors alone.

2) As space/planetary exploration survey missions go, there's no good reason nore lack of opportunity why careful attention wasn't given as to sufficient exposures, as for providing B/W survey imaging that would have easily included a large number of essentially vibrant stars above the lunar landscape/horizon. If in fact the average lunar soil was 10% reflective, at F2 we're talking about an exposure of perhaps 1 second, that which would have been more then sufficient as to subsequently dodge the overly exposed surface and/or have burned in those vibrant stars, from which any competent astronomy buff (having the exposure date and time at hand) could have easily determined the nearly exact location and orientation of that camera, as situated on the moon or wherever (area 51 for example). Even from those supposedly original exposures of 1/60th and perhaps as tight as F16 (or 125th and F8), as even those original underexposed negatives could be reprinted with sufficient dodging so that a good number of stars would present themselves (folks! that's never going to happen because, there's no such evidence). In addition, those star spangled images would have made for the most exceptionally extraordinary PR, of which NASA has never seen, thus building public support up the kazoo. Unfortunately, the entire body of what those images contain or not can't possibly be covered in any paragraph nor from just a few chapters, as there's more like books worth of issues.

3) As solar radiation goes, humans can absorb (short term) a rather considerable degree of such, however, not without fairly simple and even somewhat visual examination detection of such and, certainly that roll film had to have been impacted, not just by the 0.1 to 1.0 Sv's (100 rads) but also by the +/-250º thermal shock, by which all Earthly attempts at utilizing such specified film under similar conditions was first and foremost heavily radiation fogged and, otherwise cracked by such extreme cold and/or melt/distorted by nearly any exposures even approaching boiling, let alone +250º. So, our astronauts showed no impact whatsoever nor as for having short term nor long term exposure issues, in fact, they're nearly all healthier for their age then you or I (just totally unwilling as to say anything about anything, so perhaps their memories were about the only biological or neurological damage they actually incurred). Perhaps our occupational safety standards should thereby be safely revised as to allowing additional workplace 0.1 Sv's per year, as that's only a hundred times greater radiation exposure limits (1000s times greater then typical background), and as such, that's cutting such employment risk as well as disability claims by that same degree and, that ought to be worth saving several hundred millions per year and, best of all, folks are no worse for wear, which further represents that globally thousands of radiation exposure claims can be retroactively recovered and, that alone has to be worth hundreds of billions.

4) As ruse management goes, especially having anything to do with those "nondisclosure" NSA/DoD hidden agendas, there's no limits nor cost restraint barriers and, since all information and supposedly all of that lunar sample stuff was filtered through the "old guard", there's no way of ever determining a damn thing on behalf of NASA. Their efforts at skewing the public into believing we can't possibly see those lander debris fields and even some of the rather sizable equipment left behind is becoming another embarrassment but, becoming not nearly as embarrassing as our not being able to see Venus. Exactly how dumb do those gate keepers think the rest of us are?

5) Besides all the highly questionable photographic and image content issues, there's a bloody host of technological issues, including those supposed 1/6th gravity lunar lander test flights, of which the only recorded examples are of "what not to do", as they all failed big time and, not even under any realistic down-ranging and/or practical landing situation at that. As of today, we (NASA) have no purely rocket powered decent capable manned machine, at least not as recorded upon one foot of film as depicting anything that actually flew (especially more so as anything pre-fly by wire) and landed safely (I believe Russia has since mastered such achievements but, not as for the US). So, tell me (disregarding massive radiation issues), how the hell anything happened without a fully functional lunar lander.

6) The degree of official "spin" and "damage control", as such thrown at counteracting the anti-Apollo flak, this is truly considerable and very upscale, as carefully packaged for the benefit of our absolutely "dumb as a door nail" public and, for the most part, through considerable "info-commercials" from which the greater public bought that disinformation, hook line and sinker (like what other choice did we have, as how pathetically embarrassing)...

7) Of those that apparently had to die, just so that this NSA/DoD cold-war ruse could succeed, those deaths must include the far greater impact upon other nations, especially upon the USSR that was actually trying to get their team to the moon (more recently trying to get those Taliban out of town) and, the greater long term global impact is yet another costly "cost plus" adventure yet to be played out. As skewed history, skewed science and skewed truths go, there's simply no easy way or less damaging alternative then telling the truth and setting the record straight. The longer we wait, the more damage and subsequent global cost impact occurs and, that impact certainly includes moral issues and all of this accumulates (sort of compounding itself upon every subsequent ruse layer, then year by year impacting against faith and goodwill, certainly for some being entirely too late and for others there's no sufficient resolve that will ever set the record straight).

8) Now that we've wasted a good half century upon a totally perpetrated cold-war that's drained the global economy, damn near gotten us nuked and/or biologically eliminated;   On the surface, at least the pretense to the degree by which we played "Russian Roulette", was supposedly far more damaging to others, however, 9/11 is just one of many examples where our NSA/DoD simply went too far at playing God by pushing other peoples buttons and, subsequently because we were so busy at doing such, our front doors were left wide open for a little pay-back and, we still haven't secured the side nor back doors. So, it's welcome to the Israeli way of life, absolute fear at every corner and, no more sleeping at night.

Unfortunately, it'll take another half century just to fix everything, which means we've wasted a bloody century over damn near nothing and we have so little to show for it. Because history, science and truth have been skewed, we can't even avoid making some of those same mistakes over. Of course we'll never recover the hundreds of billion, actually it's trillions involved, let alone all those lives and talents lost forever. Unfortunately, this has become the world's most costly game and, as far as I can tell, it's still going strong.

I'm hoping (perhaps wishful thinking) that the discovery of "life on Venus" is going to somehow become worth the belated wait, sufficiently profitable enough to start compensating for our past errors and blunders and, sufficiently focused as towards humanly obtainable goals that should have only positive impacts upon humanity and lizardkind alike. How and/or why others appose such is simply further "extraordinary" proof that I've been right.

So here we go folks;  If my opposition (official and otherwise) elects to abstain, elects as to keeping their world flat as a pancake, then so be it. As the Senate appropriations rejects upon NASA's future funding, as legal and financial "class actions" arise, all I'll be able to do is restate the obvious "I told you so" and "sorry about that".

This page has been a somewhat delayed summarized update upon my admittedly very poor syntax and otherwise disorganized "moon-02.htm" page. Since there's so much to say, that'll take chapters and books and as more likely from the better capabilities of others willing and worthy of exploiting the outfall from everything Apollo/cold-war related (with the time-line as starting pre JFK, through today and perhaps tomorrow as well). As I've stated before; Apollo was no conspiracy, as it was exactly what the misinformed public wanted and more likely we (including myself at the time) couldn't get enough against all those "dirty rotten communist". OOPS; I guess they turned out not being so dirty nor rotten after all, so perhaps that's what the actual conspiracy was, where Apollo simply became a darn good means to an end, unfortunately it's turning out being our end, but what the hey, you can't have those nifty wars and subsequent carnage without enemies, so even phony ones will have to due (like Iraq, Cuba, don't forget those nasty North Korean's and China and so on, come to think of it, I never much cared for those pretentious folks of Monaco)....