I'm still looking forward to either your support and talents, and/or perhaps a team effort which can either utilize or advance upon the likes of what my discovery and other that I can contribute. I'm somewhat limited but not opposed to working with other Nationals, even if that issue should impose further risk for that of American space exploration interest. Over the past 32+ months, NASA and thereby NSA/DoD has always been given the first of many opportunities (upon countless occasions), as to breaking out of their stuffy box, as well as towards contributing something (anything) the least bit constructive and/or informative. So far, there's been darn little except their contempt, plus their ongoing efforts at bashing myself and of what this discovery represents, of forcing it, and of anything like it, into the ground at all cost.
This freelance research phase is simply pertaining to a very low cost opportunity (nearly an undetectable initial research opportunity), as that pertaining to a purely friendly interplanetary utilization of laser communications for continued exploration, and that of hopefully our eventually establishing communications with whomever, that's supposedly going to become beneficial to all that should care to get involved, and this should be of near zero impact upon those choosing to abstain for whatever honest reasons. Exactly how in the hell that's representing anything anti-American and/or of the least bit of a threat, or even disrespectful towards the mostly good accomplishments and abilities of NASA, in other words you tell me. What exactly is there of sufficient worth to hide? or hide from?
Unlike NASA and their vast club of prestigious cult members, I make loads of mistakes, I even make correction mistakes and, I'll likely make more of those pesky mistakes as long as the status quo remains so insistent upon blocking this opportunity at all cost, of their avoiding their responsibility of essentially supporting humanity, that being inclusive of whomever or whatever is surviving where their NASA moderated bible clearly stipulates otherwise.
In order to better establish who I am, of what my focus or intent is and, why this seemingly simple observation of what's to be seen has since become such a communications worthy opportunity, and of why those subsequent efforts have oddly become such a difficult task, it may help to consider if I were to first include some further insights into certain other aspects of why I believe the likes of NASA and their supporters are remaining so opposed (if you'd like to focus upon something a little more specific, I'll eventually provide that as well). Most of the efforts opposing my research are of those looking their hardest to figure out how in the hell they can stop and/or disqualify me, not as for trying to be supportive nor the least bit informative, as god forbid, they don't want to be associated with an outsider, especially one that's questioning their pagan "cash cow" god.
Besides just being my informative self, I'm apparently their worst nightmare, the village idiot from hell that isn't going away anytime soon. Sorry about that, what can I say. It wasn't that I didn't try being overly nice in the beginning (from time to time I still make that sort of effort), as I even had the mistaken notion or perhaps allusion that there were at least few nice folks within and/or associated with NASA. As usual, that was another one of my village idiot mistakes, at least so far there's been absolutely no light at the end of that tunnel.
It just goes to show; that if you're even indirectly suggesting that perhaps others could have and likely should have done a somewhat better job (like the job they were initially hired and paid to do with respect to interpreting those Magellan images of Venus), your integrity is instantly and automatically jeopardised. Club insiders that became considered as non-team players, have unfortunately met with far graver results as an outcome of their challenges against the establishment (enforcement of that "nondisclosure policy" can become sufficiently lethal, as by your signing that exclusive club membership agreement, you have basically authorized [without legal nor other recourse] your demise, as to that demise being accommodated if need be by the very company you keep, especially if it's their butts on the line if the truth be known).
Humans do certainly make a lot of mistakes. I know this for a fact because, I've made thousands. The only difference between my bounty of mistakes and those of others, especially those exploited by the likes of NASA/NSA/DoD, is that my mistakes haven't killed anyone, not that I can recall, haven't (speaking just of those US/Mexican wars and of our presents in Cuba) falsely taken land(s) and occupied the national properties of others, I haven't even intimidated one soul (unless you'd care to consider this sort of effort as an act of intimidation). I haven't placed protective "nondisclosure" shields about myself nor of my country, I haven't inflicted economical sanctions upon competitive international challenges, haven't perpetrated any fictitious cold-wars, haven't intentionally undermined the governments of this or of other Nations, haven't perpetrated a serious of other hidden agendas such as the Apollo ruse and, I have not supported the Afghan Al-Qaida so as to indirectly punish (for some obscure reasons which I still can't figure out) our supposed arch enemy of Russia (as in what the hell did they ever do to us?). Nor have I been subsequently supporting those nice Israeli folks (which are obviously more then capable of fairly competing as well as doing their own dirty work, including their taking out our USS LIBERTY) and, above all else, I'm not one of those being paid directly nor indirectly by the taxpayer as to accommodate any of the above agendas, nor on behalf of cloaking those ulterior motives under the phony baloney guise of NASA. In other words, I'm not one of those cloak and dagger team players.
Other than all of that gibberish, my mistakes are most often purely of syntax and/or a little dyslexia related. In other words; I seem to know exactly what I mean, I simply have some difficulty getting others into understanding it and, my critics just love capitalizing upon that opportunity, almost as much as watching while others unknowingly accomplish our cold-war dirty work, so that they can pretend as having nothing whatsoever as to being associated and/or ashamed of (even if there are thousands of those dead bodies laying all about their feet). Example; 9/11 and of long before that was the likes of US sanctioned British/French intentional downing of the Russian SST, then how about the 6 Day War involving the USS LIBERTY fiasco and, in between and ever since there have been all sorts of other highly questionable events, of secret endeavors and subsequent fallouts, some of which should literally have scared you to death, that is if you're not already dead as a result, such as regarding our mock fully configured thermonuclear attack invasions, of those going deep into Russian territories, as just to see what they might do. OK, that was a little gutsy and perhaps a bit big of ourselves and, for some still unexplained divine reason, most of us are still hear to talk about it. Do you think that per chance have we learned anything?; like our recently spying on China fiasco and 9/11 seem to clearly indicate that we have not.
Among other personal expertise; I am one of those sufficiently good at commercial/research photography, trained and experienced in levels of electronic circuitry that includes navigational radar technology (somewhat similar to those NSA SAR imaging technologies). I've acquired some aerial photography time and have studied the works of many spy gathering images, few of which offer the higher degree and extraordinary proof qualifications as represented by those Magellan mission images (still SAR offers better truth information then the best from those recent Mars images, by which [even by the latest CCD offering 100 times better resolution] have so far totally failed as to disclose upon one artificially worthy community like consideration). Based upon what other alternatives I can see, I guess I'm no longer all that convinced these NASA/NSA/DoD fools could even locate something artificial on Earth, such as those WMDs, supposedly hundreds of tonnes worth, plus all those relatively massive missiles seem to have remained oddly quite illusive (how bloody embarrassing).
For just a few brief words on these Venus discovery examples; I certainly know of what an aerial view of a seriously large reservoir looks like, especially as from the terrific perspective vantage point of 43º, more so if those are of multiple such complex elements gathered into a complex unit, along with an associated long connection path to that of a fifth and somewhat larger circumference reservoir (having a dark [thereby fluid like] center). I also have a fairly good idea or perhaps another village idiot notion of what a substantial and mile long bridge that's spanning a deep "grand canyon" looks like. If and whenever I perceive the nose of an cylindric rigid airframe, as in representing that of something like a massive airship protruding out from under a sufficiently larger silo/hangar, I can somewhat badly calculate (based upon the registered 75 meter/pixel or perhaps even the 225 meter/pixel format) as to the remaining portion of that airship, then with the help of others experienced in such airship technology, I can subsequently deliver an estimate upon the likely capabilities of what this airship buoyancy might represent, always keeping in mind that bigger is certainly better with regard to such items being identified as more likely artificial than not. A community of relatively tall buildings, of those being highly geometrical arrangements and further associated with intersecting road like modifications is hardly to be found in nature, not to mention how much less likely if there's a freaking tarmac consideration to boot. Good grief folks, if these considerations were any more obvious, they'd have to be images of Earth, as there's way more believable photographic intelligence offered here than those of the Cuban missile crisis.
I can understand or at least accept to some degree, the physics and chemistry of many potential energy aspects, that is of course, if I'm being fed the proper knowledge and not otherwise more of their intentional disinformation, such as often being provided by all the pro-NASA opposition has to offer against just about anything I'm suggesting. With more of the correct data in hand, I can also openly share this sort of knowledge, such as that pertaining to the converting of CO2-->CO/O2, as well as to my recent understanding of the potentials of applying vertical column offset differential (4+ bar/km), offering a dense vertical kinetic wind power that can be efficiently delivered onto turbines capable of generating lots of serious electro-mechanical energy, and then subsequently as to the likes of obtaining H2 and even H2O2/C12H26 as being something entirely viable as for the planet Venus to harness, as according to those laws of physics, even H2O can be efficiently vacuum distilled directly from those relatively cool nighttime clouds, then kept liquid under a relatively slight pressure, somewhat like how we've stored LNG. Of course, most all of this falls under the little known physics law of "duh 101".
Due extensively to further appreciating the truly exceptional "extraordinary proof" established by the 8-bit digital SAR images; unlike my pathetic critics that only try to find faults, I do believe life at some point in time existed and may still exist on such a planet the size and location of Venus and, that somehow creation and evolution managed, and not least of all upon sufficient levels of intelligence that was not merely restricted to the likes of Earth nor focused upon the sorts of humanity as we know it (too bad our prestigious learning institutions are actually such intellectual bigots, and otherwise so willing as to perpetrate and subsequently foster whatever the likes of our NSA/DoD warlords have in stock for us, in other words, you obviously don't go about biting those hands that are feeding you).
For yet another perfectly good example of what can easily and affordably be accomplished; via Laser Communications (even duplex, two-way binary packets are possible) especially for such local planetary area code usage is actually not all that difficult, not even all that expensive anymore. I now fully understand (in spite of my not receiving support nor assistance directly from NASA on this subject) that this laser technology is simply not all that complicated, not even requiring anything approaching laser cannon potential, as a single KW at most can manage quite nicely at reaching a planet such as Venus, with more than sufficient intensity and focus (especially during October 2002 through November 2002 where all of 50 watts would more than do the trick) and, equally has been our ability as to detecting such a reply has been yet another done deal. Yet my insistence that we should attempt a round of nearly zero cost efforts, commencing sufficiently prior to October 2002, has gone unanswered as well as unchallenged. So, I must be totally and absolutely dead right about our NASA, as for their being thoroughly controlled and thereby orchestrated by the likes of NSA/DoD, of those ulterior motives still fostering the likes of the cold-war, regardless of how many tall buildings must fall.
My laser communications "first contact" discovery URL: http://geocities.com/bradguth/laser-com.htm
A question of how, or perhaps a better phrase is why such a worthy discovery and subsequent opportunity can go unheeded?
What other cost impacts (speaking of ongoing "damage control") and/or other knowledge (such as truth's) is so great a threat, that allowing the world to know about and hopefully communicate with whatever or whomever is existing on Venus is simply too risky or politically damaging?
Obviously I have more than a clue as to what's going on, though you may not, so figure out how my limited opposition of the NASA/NSA/DoD status quo can even possibly register, unless per chance I've managed to uncover somewhat far more then my fair share of knowledge?
I will certainly understand if you are still not following my drift, as most critics have certainly not been those looking for the truth, but instead, looking hardest for my mistakes and otherwise focused upon official "damage control" on behalf of protecting their cash cow gods of NASA/NSA/DoD (in their limited or Borg vision and systematically cultivated minds, NASA/NSA/DoD have never once made a mistake worth covering up, period!, at least nothing that was actually their fault and, I too still believe in the tooth fairy).
If you are not such a manipulated critic, and have somewhat of a death wish as to becoming involved, as to either supporting my ongoing research and/or as to accomplishing something upon your own (even if you intend to take NASA/NSA/DoD's side), then I can help by summarizing upon what is otherwise likely contained throughout essentially hundreds of pages, especially of those pages which have been developed over the past year. By having your staff contact me directly, asking whatever specific questions, I'll try to provide my best efforts at focusing our mutual efforts on what I can see and of what I feel this discovery has to offer, thus saving your staff from having to read and sift through hours worth of my not so perfect work.
(so much has become defensive in my retaliation towards those obviously intent solely upon destroying this opportunity. As it seems, I certainly no longer have to speculate anymore, nor apply supposition all that much [at least not anymore], as for just looking at the official record has offered more then sufficient proof that I'm a whole lot more right than not).
As you may already have discovered, in spite of my limited resources, I can manage to return a warm and fuzzy favor or two. Too bad I'm not fully involved (officially funded) with regard to these Venus discoveries and subsequent opportunities, as I would have little time nor incentives as to returning any such favors on behalf of my critics (most likely, I could eventually become addicted to all that insider loot, thereby more than willing to being equally silenced by that very same "nondisclosure policy", of which I have no intentions of ever agreeing to because, that would have but myself in the very same bed as with the likes of those NSA/DoD bastards that got us into this offal mess in the first place).
I can only hope that your Nation and associated research agencies are not so compromised as our NASA, thereby capable of openly seeing the relevance and the greater good by which the further exploration and eventual contact with Venus holds.
If need be, I may be having to work through the ACLU in order to see that my postings and email gets through. It seems rather pathetic that I even have to consider doing such, only because someone (a certain government agency) feering what it is I have to offer, would be creating the sort of firewalls and other internet related blockades, as well as snooping and even moderating through my privet documents without my knowing (well, obviously not just anyone, as I'm sure the likes of Hitler and Stalin had to resort to those sorts of things and, I recall something about "book burning" as another proven solution, at least for upholding arrogance and stupidity).
Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA 1-253-8576061
Main discovery URL: http://geocities.com/bradguth
Alternate (backup): http://guthvenus.tripod.com