As promised (9 months later), your friendly Editor finally has gotten
time to do some testing with the rest I purchased last December. As it
turns out, I was also furnished a second rest so I tried it out as well.
The one I bought was from Eitan Barazani at
http://machinerest.hypermart.net/,
and the one that was sent to me came from Newt Engle, Rifle Coach at Univ
of Akron, and was actually made by his father for his daughter, Angie.
Thus, it has been dubbed Angie's Rifle Rest.
Eitan's rest is based upon the "Russian" rest though it is much
larger overall and uses 2 parallel pins that a recoil bar can engage to
keep the rifle upright as opposed to having the stock leaning against a
pad. It should be high enough to clear the grip on any rifle without
worry. Check out his sight for pics. The bars ride on Teflon (delrin?)
hemispherical pads. While I haven't seen the "Russian" rest up
close, Eitan's recoil bars were nicely engineered so I'll give him credit
for the thought that went into it.
Angie's rest is a homemade design. Essentially you have 2 large ball
bearings riding in stainless angle iron and a rounded-end bolt riding on
a stainless pad. Thus, this gives 5 total contact points in a tripod
configuration as opposed to just 4 for rests based upon the
"Russian" design. This rest sits much lower than the others
(the angles and pad are simply welded to 1/4" plate) so you'll need
to mount it near the edge in order to clear the grips on the rifles. The
rest was provided with wooden "shims" of plywood/paneling and
bolts of 3 lengths for use with air rifles. The first rest I received had
a ball bearing that was broken off in shipment (cold weld?) even though
it was well packed, and it was promptly replaced.
Now for the test. The test was conducted on our indoor range with the
ventilation off so there was no wind at all. Temperature was 75-84F and
~65% humidity. Distance was 121 feet or just over 40 yards (36.9 meters).
Both rests were fired off the same base, which is made from 8"
channel steel and was bolted to the concrete floor. Edelmann targets were
used for clean holes. All tests were done using the same lot of Eley
Tenex from the same case. 13 Anschutz rifles from 1963-1999 were used and
they were cleaned before being used on each rest. I then shot 5 10-shot
groups from each rifle and then 3 more 10-shots groups several hours
later after they had cooled down again. I shot quickly (10-15 seconds per
shot usually) so the barrels would get fairly warm by the 4th
group.
I tried Angie's rest first. My first concern was the
"roughness" of the stainless angle and pads as these were stock
parts, not machined. After some initial testing, I measured the recoil of
a free rifle to be 1/8" and a sport rifle to be 3/16-1/4". I
decided to try some graphite and it help noticeably, increasing the
recoil distance to 1/4" and 3/8" respectively. Things went
fairly well after that until I got to the standard rifle and air rifles.
The holes in the shims provided were not precise enough so I couldn't get
the bolts all the way through. I increased the hole diameter in the shims
to allow more play room (it could use a bit more still). The rest proved
quite flexible, being able to adjust to any forend angle. The only air
rifle I could not do was an LGM-2 which has a rail with an odd profile so
"standard" accessories won't fit it (the LG-210 has a
"standard" rail so I could test it). The other thing I did not
care for was the wooden shims as the wood compresses (not to mention
splinters). I think something like plexiglass would work well.
Eitan's rest was simpler to use because there is only one screw per
recoil bar (as opposed to 2 per attachement for Angie's) and the bars
center themselves when you tighten them down. Recoil with this rest was
1/8" for a free rifle and 3/16" for a sport rifle. I had tried
months earlier to see if graphite would help and I couldn't observe any
improvement. I ran into problems when trying to do air rifles. The
adapter provided has a fixed angle so the barrel isn't parallel though
FWB is pretty close. 2002 was pointing at my ceiling so the 1907 would as
well. I didn't deem this acceptable. Apparently there is another adapter
that he came up with about the time I bought this that will accomodate
anything but I don't have this.
The bottom line: Angie's was quite versatile and is significantly cheaper
so it's a good value. I expected to see some wear on the parts since the
stainless isn't smooth or machined. You could tell where the bearings
rode but there wasn't visiable wear after over 1000 rounds. There was a
bit more wear on the rounded bolt that rode on the flat pad, which I
expected as it isn't hardened. I would use another ball bearing here and
replace the wood shims with plastic.
Eitan's rest is much nicer looking and quicker to use. In this
configuration I had, I could not test our 1907 or any of our air rifles.
Even if the angle were correct, I could not test either of the Walters
and the FWB would need to have some weight added on the barrel or removal
of the checkpiece to alter to balance point. I cannot speak for how well
his other adapter works. I could definitely tell where the recoil bars
rode on the teflon pads but couldn't tell if it had worn down or was just
"polished."
Much to my dismay, I only have 1 rifle that likes the Tenex we have! The
best groups were ~1/2" outside edge at just over 40 yards. Needless
to say, I'll be investigating a couple other types. Groups were fairly
close between rests though Angie's rest usually had slightly better ones
if there was a discrepancy. I have no idea why. I also did a short test
on Eitan's rest using a rubber band as resistance to recoil since I've
heard from several places that these kind of rests often do better like
this for some reason. I could tell no difference in the 3 10-shot groups
I shot.
I will do some more tests at Thanksgiving or Christmas with some other
ammo (and hopefully better groups) and will let you know if I find out
anything different. If anyone would like me to compare their rest as
well, just ship one to me and I'll include it in the next round of
tests.
[Editor - it's probably too late for this (if it would have even made a
difference anyway), but you never know I guess.]
I logged on to the NBC Olympic web site and saw the following comment
from
the host: "I can empathize with you Don, I have made several
proposals to
NBC to increase the discussion topics in the shooting forum, none have
come
forward. I believe though that NBC is in a catch-22 situation. They would
devote more resources and coverage to shooting events if the interest
warranted it, and you and I feel more resources would increase interest.
I
can not fault NBC though, when you look at these forums, swimming and
gymnastics have over 1000 posts each, shooting less than 100. NBC will
devote it's resources accordingly.
Guys if we want NBC coverage of the Olympics we need to log on to http://www.nbcolympics.com/
and let NBC know we are out there. Register as a
new member and go to the Forums section and say something.
Having just attended a major pistol shooting tournament in Canada I heard an interesting rumour and I wonder if you or anyone whom subscribes to your list has heard it as well. Mr Nick Alexakos, president of the newly formed World Shooting Federation { www.worldshootingfederation.com}
stated that he is of the belief that after the 2000
Sydney games the I.O.C. will vote to ban all Olympic shooting sports that use gunpowder leaving only the 10 meter air gun events. Has anyone else heard of this ?
[Editor - I have heard a similar rumor though it was a bit later down the road like 2008/2012. Just airguns and shotguns. It hasn't helped that the shooting community screwed themselves out of quotas the last 2 Olympics.]
********************************************************************
End of UIT Mailing List #29