• home
• back

{What happened, so far}

• Thursday, 20.00-23:00
  The physicist still adds one and one. He gets three: The stupid means to camouflage the Hg-content he explains by claiming that 'they' know exactly how it is measured. Everywhere in the world. Always the same. At the NIH, at the PEI, at ... everywhere. And if you have to have samples without Hg, why start the dangerous deception in the first place? The bogus claim that 204Hg is redioactive, he explains by claiming there must be 203Hg, too. 203Hg is very short lived and must be made by nuclear reactions. So they intentionally want to poison their customers. Thats a case for the Clark-Kent letter. Dr. Vogelpfeif, its your turn (Note: This is a reference to an infamous german news letter and a well known internet kook). At least, he flatters me: "the paper is very well written, by somebody who knows exactly what he is doing" I never saw a real mass spectometer in my life. Google is cool, isnt it :-) The isotopes of Hg I also got from the web.

And on and on and on.. if you fancy and have the time