The thiomersal-fake .. the fake itself (II)


{... dirty details} The paper claims the Thiomersal content is monitored only by mass spectrometry- thats (not plausible), and by using heavy Hg isotopes the peak will be shifted outside the monitoring window. (This is true only for very special circumstances.)! If only one sample is measured by, eg, AAS, everything will be revealed. A unnatural isotopic content would be a smoking gun.
Now, to get these isotopes, you just put aluminum foil in your machine, push a few buttons.. wait a minute? Many countries in this world go to great pains to isolate (uranium)-isotopes and we just use some aluminum foil? Hello? Seen the news recently? So it's BULLSHIT, too. Isotopes are isolated by other means, and you could simply buy them.
But that the mercury is from toxic waste, that it is RADIOACTIVE- thats just what people want to read. But it is bullshit,204Hg is NOT radioactive)...-
Finaly, there is the pompous headline 'DO NOT STORE ON NETWORKED COMPUTERS', and a 'MD5 v2 authenticity fingerprint ...' completely made up!
I'm very proud of the end: D2O is really used, but T2O definitely not: It has a half life of a few years, so it is highly radioactive- so it cannot be hidden, there are detectors everywhere where people work with radioactivity- like in hospitals. I think that everybody who claims he can run a news letter with vaccination info should instantly realize these and other blunders!

(continue left..)


  © 2005 · Thomas X. · Emailsend email
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1