
Syria &
Jordan
HA'ARETZ 1/29/99: "Jordan is worried that opposition groups, including Syrian
agents and supporters, will try to test the power and authority of the new crown prince,
Abdullah.
Supporters of the Syrian Baath party have a special influence on concentrations of
Palestinian refugees. Syria has been conducting subversive activity in Jordan for years.
Leaders in Damascus who were busy this week with the reelection of President Assad for
another term, refrained from commenting on the dramatic turn of events in Amman.
Other Arab leaders expressed their support of King Hussein and have sent their
blessings to Abdullah. There is a widespread feeling in Amman that if the king does not
recover, the kingdom could fall into instability because of Abdullah's lack of experience.
The managing director of one of the kingdom's largest financial companies said
yesterday that the main danger was that of a rift in the Hashemite family, that would be
exploited by parts of the Palestinian opposition, Islamic fundamentalists and others.
The social structure in Jordan is tribal and family-based, and integrates various
Palestinian sectors. The Hashemite palace is the balancing and compromising factor among
them, and its unity is an essential condition for the stability of the regime - and
perhaps for its existence.
Against this backdrop, Abdullah must demonstrate the family's unity. In the past two
days he has appeared everywhere accompanied by a large group of relatives who stood by him
as he shook the hands of thousands of well-wishers.
Almost all of the family members hold government positions. Most of them received an
elitist education in prestigious institutions in Britain and the United States and they
have political experience.
Abdullah will need their help and public support when he starts, soon, to seek
solutions for the difficult problems: the crisis in Iraq, the shaky economy and the
permanent settlement between Israel and the Palestinians, in whose design Jordan wants to
take part..."

Shahak doldrums
THE JERUSALEM POST 1/27/98: "Amnon Lipkin-Shahak's requests to meet with key
individuals in both the US and British Jewish communities did not receive many positive
responses, The Jerusalem Post has learned from sources in both countries yesterday.
Indeed, such was the apathy in Britain that Shahak, the center party No. 2, canceled
his planned trip there on his way back from the US.
"The main fundraisers in London think Shahak and the other political leaders are
on an ego trip," said one British source. "They don't want to fund ego trips,
which are not for the good of the country."
Shahak's center party staff yesterday refused to give any details of his visit to the
US. A Shahak spokesman also refused to say whether the UK was on the original itinerary
but just said "Shahak will be traveling directly back from the US to Israel."
Immediately after Monday night's news conference, which proclaimed the party's leader
as Yitzhak Mordechai, Shahak left for the US. He will be there until Sunday for what his
office described early yesterday as a "flexible" program. Later in the day, even
the word "flexible" was replaced with a flat "no comment."
Political sources both here and in the US told The Post that Shahak was not being well
received in the US and was finding it difficult to fill his timetable. Some even suggested
that Shahak delayed his trip by two days to allow his staff to fill up his program.
However, party workers said he decided to postpone the visit because of Mordechai's
decision to join and the negotiations this entailed..."

Golan bill
THE JERUSALEM POST 1/27/99: "After a five-year campaign for the people to
determine the fate of the Golan Heights, the Knesset yesterday passed a law requiring a
vote supported by 61 MKs, followed by a majority in a referendum, before territory under
Israeli sovereignty can be ceded.
The requirement for holding a referendum will only take effect after the next Knesset
legislates a basic law for referendums. The 53-30 result reflected a show of unity in the
coalition and the absence of most Labor Party MKs.
The MKs who voted against included dovish Labor MKs such as Shimon Peres and Yossi
Beilin, and those from Meretz, Hadash and the Democratic Arab Party...
The vote came after MK Salah Salim (Hadash) proposed turning it into a motion of
no-confidence in the prime minister. However, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu asked for
the vote to be held as an immediate vote of confidence in himself.
This prompted ex-defense minister Yitzhak Mordechai to refrain from voting. Yet, he
also announced yesterday that his center party competing in the upcoming elections is
willing to make territorial compromise in the Golan.
Fellow center party members Haggai Merom and Nissim Zvilli, still officially Labor MKs,
voted against the bill. Labor MKs such as party whip Elie Goldschmidt, who had previously
come out firmly behind the bill, absented themselves, apparently due to concern for their
outcome in the party primaries.
Labor Party leader Ehud Barak also absented himself. Meretz leader Yossi Sarid said the
law is the "same as the one that had banned meeting with members of the Palestine
Liberation Organization." He said the Golan Heights law "would have the same
fate, and end up in the graveyard of legislation."
Third Way leader Avigdor Kahalani said yesterday's vote is "only part of the
process needed to support the Golan Heights." He said his party would work to ensure
that the referendum legislation is completed and that communities on the Heights continue
to enjoy support. He said the party would launch a massive effort during Pessah to bring
people to the Golan..."

Vote on Religious Councils
THE JERUSALEM POST 1/27/99: "In a setback for efforts by the Reform and
Conservative movements to obtain equal status with the Orthodox, the government-sponsored
bill aimed at blocking them from religious councils was passed into law by the Knesset
yesterday, albeit by only one vote.
The 50-49 outcome, with one abstention from Knesset Speaker Dan Tichon (Likud),
culminated an acrimonious, 10-hour debate on hundreds of reservations to the bill that
began on Monday night and resumed yesterday morning.
The government drafted the legislation as part of a coalition demand from religious
parties, after the High Court of Justice ruled that non-Orthodox members must be allowed
on the councils. The bill requires religious council members to sign an oath of allegiance
to the rulings of the Chief Rabbinate.
United Torah Judaism made the passage of the bill a condition for its support of the
1999 state budget and economic arrangements bill. UTJ's Avraham Ravitz, chairman of the
Knesset Finance Committee, suspended deliberations on the budget until the bill was
approved.
Ex-defense minister Yitzhak Mordechai, the leader of the new center party, voted in
favor of the bill. MK Dan Meridor (Likud), who also has joined the center party, was
absent.
MK Alex Lubotzky (The Third Way), who has joined the center party and has been working
to reach compromises on religious issues, voted against the bill. He said he did not know
why Mordechai had supported the bill...
According to a reservation approved to the bill, an amendment to the Religious Services
Law, those who do not keep to the oath of allegiance lose their membership in the council.
Opponents of the law were furious that the efforts to enlist a majority to foil the
measure, including many members of the coalition, failed by only one vote. Yisrael
Ba'aliya MKs and ministers, whose faction decided to vote against the bill, were furious
when renegade MKs Yuri Stern and Michael Nudelman absented themselves from the vote.
The passage of the law was also blamed on no-shows from the Labor Party, including
renegade MK Rafik Haj-Yihye and Rafi Edri, who is not seeking re-election. Gesher's three
active MKs also absented themselves..."

Mordecais vote on Religious Councils
HA'ARETZ 1/28/99: "...The chief executive of the Reform Synagogues of Great
Britain, Rabbi Tony Bayfield, said Mordechai's vote suggests a stance that is anything but
centrist.
"The vote in the Knesset blocking the Reform and Conservative movements from
representation on religious councils in Israel is nothing short of deplorable - it is a
disgrace," he said.
"As a cynical exercise in rabbinical power politics, it is matched only by the
venality of certain politicians selling their votes or abdicating their responsibility by
staying away.
Quite how Mr. Mordechai will now expect to serve in a 'centrist' party defies
belief." Paul Usishkin, who heads the Israel action division of Great Britain's
Reform synagogues, said he would use every democratic means at his disposal to change the
situation in Israel.
British Reform leaders said their relations with Israel have been seriously injured.
Attempts by Israeli politicians to solicit campaign donations from British Jewish
philanthropists would almost certainly be refused, they said, and other philanthropy to
Israeli causes could decline as well.
Rabbi Eric Yoffie, who heads the Reform movement in North America, joined the chorus of
Reform leaders decrying Mordechai's move. "Is his vote in the Knesset a hint as to
how he intends to treat the Reform movement in the future?" Yoffie asked
rhetorically.
"Does he plan to sell us to the Orthodox in Israel?" Yoffie said that someone
who aspires to be prime minister of Israel must understand that the role also calls for
acting as the leader of the Jewish people.
Yoffie is slated to meet with Shahak during the latter's ongoing New York visit. Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with a delegation of 33 North American
Reform rabbis, including seven women, at the Knesset on Monday.
Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch, who heads the Association of Reform Zionists of America, said the
delegation is seeking but has not yet been promised an audience with Mordechai. The group
is scheduled to meet with Barak, Dan Meridor and Roni Milo."

Reform and Conservative leaders to fight the Religious
Councils law
HA'ARETZ 1/27/99: "Reform and Conservative leaders in Israel said last night they
would fight the new Religious Councils law not by appealing to the High Court of Justice,
but by instructing non-Orthodox Jews abroad to withhold donations from those Knesset
members who supported the law.
Reform Rabbi Uri Regev, who heads the Israel Religious Action Center, said the MKs who
voted for the law "would get theirs," and would soon find themselves boycotted
by Diaspora communities.
Rabbi Ehud Bandel, who heads the Conservative movement in Israel, said Diaspora Jews
would withhold campaign contributions from those Israeli politicians who voted for the
law.
Regev and Bandel yesterday sent their colleagues in the U.S. a list showing how each MK
voted on the new law...Regev said that should the councils refuse to fund Reform and
Conservative organizations, the United Jewish Appeal would likely divert money of its own
to those organizations.
"We will have to refer the needy who currently receive funds from the UJA to
Ravitz," he said, referring to Knesset Finance Committee Chair Avraham Ravitz, of
United Torah Judaism.
The Reform and Conservative representatives embroiled in the controversy over sitting
on the religious councils in Haifa, Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Arad and Kiryat Tivon said they
would sign the loyalty oath.
Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi Yisrael Meir Lau said he did yet know whether the Rabbinate would
authorize Orthodox representatives on the religious councils to sit down with non-Orthodox
representatives, now that the law has passed.
But Haifa Chief Rabbi Shear-Yashuv HaCohen ruled that the "mixed seating" was
permissible..."

Original clauses of the Religious Councils Bill
HA'ARETZ 1/27/99: "The Knesset passed a series of amendments to the Religious
Councils bill yesterday between votes on the second and third readings, making the version
finally passed far stricter than the bill's original incarnation and encoding halacha as
the guiding law for local religious councils.
The original version included two main clauses:
1. Religious council members will be required to declare their intention to uphold the
Religious Services Law:
That law will be amended so that religious councils will have to follow the Chief
Rabbinate's rulings "on all Halachic [Jewish law] matters."
The version signed into law yesterday included three key additions:
1) Council members will have to sign their declarations of fealty.
2) Any council member who violates his or her oath will be expelled from the council.
(The law does not say who determines whether the oath has been violated.)
3) The council will have to follow the Rabbinate's rulings not just on Halachic
matters, but on "any issue within [the council's] jurisdiction."
And so it was yesterday that local religious councils became the first public
institutions for which halacha is officially law, period - even when it comes to purely
administrative matters.
In all likelihood, the Reform and the ultra-Orthodox will differ on how the law is
interpreted, and no doubt the High Court of Justice will have to deal with several appeals
on the matter within the next few months."