| From | Message |
Anonymous
1/05/2001
20:48:54 |
 Subject: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
THATS RIGHT ..NEVER THINK ANYTHING YOU POST OR LOOK AT IS ANONYMOUS. HOW DO YOU THINK THEY CAUGHT THE LOVE BUG GUY WITHIN A WEEK?HE THOUGHT HE WAS ANONYMOUS...BE ENLIGHTENED "A FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NO SECURITY"
|
DAR34
1/06/2001
09:35:32 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
NOT TRUE. EVERY investigative method has an counter. The Love Bugger was not a professional cracker.
|
monica leiberman
1/11/2001
21:31:49 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
anonymity is relative, not absolute:
security is relative, not absolute:
if you surf without precautions, any site you visit CAN, and every web bug operator WILL know who you are (and everywhere [and when] [and how often] you visit)
if you use Multiproxy properly, only your web bug operator and your ISP know you and your surfing habits
there is freeware for blocking web bugs
there is freeware for removing web bugs
you can visit secure sites that encrypt your data so that your ISP knows how much data it ships to you, but it cannot READ that data.
your net security is inversely proportional to the number of net-savvy people you piss off.
even if you take several precautions, including chaining proxies, it just doesn't make any sense to piss off a major corporation or get a government agency interested in nailing you.
as DAR34 noted above, its a constant struggle between the lock makers and the lock-pickers, between the cats and the mice
Moby Dick was able to beat Captain Ahab, but suppose Moby had hacked into MacroWhales site, and the Empire had sent entire fleets of whalers after Moby? Then Moby would have been on the string instead of Ahab, [or perhaps Moby's source code would now be available on the net for free].
|
tom
1/12/2001
09:08:23 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
monica leiberman:
I would like to know what you use to anonymously surf the web. I mean do you use encryption companies? Tell us some of the companies that you trust on them.
I´ve been told that this companies that encrypts your surfing only encrypts when data (the websites you visit) is sent back to you after it passes their servers but they can´t encrypt the request you make to their servers before you get the website you´re trying to visits, so your ISP will still know what you´re visiting. If i´m wrong let me know or give us an idea about what you think.
Also i have a small question:
"if you use Multiproxy properly, only your web bug operator and your ISP know you and your surfing habits". I don´t know what a web bug operator is. Could you tell me what is it?.
Thank you
|
JonaS
1/12/2001
09:16:39 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Web bug is analogous to a webmaster.
Try Safe Web for encrypted communicae over the web:
http://www.safeweb.com
SafeWeb Always:
- encrypts and protects content
- sanitizes dangerous scripts
- masks your computer's address
SafeWeb Lets You:
- block profiling cookies
- profile the profilers
- disable pop-up windows
|
tom
1/12/2001
09:26:54 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
JonaS,
I´m still not sure about the following:
"i´ve been told that this companies that encrypts your surfing only encrypts when data (the websites you visit) is sent back to you after it passes their servers but they can´t encrypt the request you make to their servers before you get the website you´re trying to visits, so your ISP will still know what you´re visiting".
|
DAR65
1/12/2001
16:13:55 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Monica,
A superb post, easily one of the best ever posted here.
"your net security is inversely proportional to the number of net-savvy people you piss off".
Amen.
Be warned,anonymous public proxies are adequate for everyday surfing; but do not steal through them, they will not hold up.
|
Bobo
1/12/2001
16:49:28 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
The Encryption web-host-server encrypts everything sent to your computer and all your ISP sees is the web-host-server of the encryption site.
|
tom
1/13/2001
06:30:58 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Bobo: "The Encryption web-host-server encrypts everything sent to your computer and all your ISP sees is the web-host-server of the encryption site". Yes but i´m talking about when you are making the request to the web-host-server not when the web-host-server send everything to me (i know this is encrypted but i´m not sure if the request is encrypted). For example, you make a request to the web-host-server that you want to see www.yahoo.com, and when the web-host-server has the page it sends encrypted to you. If this is right you are not being really anonymous because your IPS can see that you made a request to www.yahoo.com, so there is no anonymity at all. If i´m wrong let me know.
|
DAR67
1/13/2001
09:14:10 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
A tunneling service SHOULD encrypt both the data received and the URL requested, your ISP won't know where you went. It's an encrypted line between your browser and the service, the ISP relays the traffic, but they can't read it.I've seen Earthlink logs of a tunnel service, mine, they were scrambled in 256bit Blowfish. It's not 100%, but it's the best non criminal method currently avaliable.
|
S
1/13/2001
14:41:24 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Dear Tom:
Not true. An encrypted connection, or "tunnel" exists between your browser and the SSL server. Their server cannot fetch pages anonymously, but it does encrypt them on the return. Your ISP cannot read them because the encrypted "tunnel" passes thru their server. Your ISP will know you are connecting to an SSL server but will not know what is being downloaded and, if URL encryption exists, not even be able to read the requests. Some SSL servers offer URL encryption, others not.
|
Quantity
1/13/2001
20:20:24 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Dar,
He was a hacker, not a cracker. Difference.
Quanity :-)
|
DAR118
1/13/2001
21:23:35 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
A distinction lost on most. The term here is slacker, he got caller IDd by Skynet using his home phone.
|
bochange
1/14/2001
06:39:06 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
I read all your messages and my heart is beating 200 times a minute.
I thought that exist a method to surf anonumous. I know that all of u have use stolen credit card. So one day all of was will be arested ? ? ?
Please respond me!!!
|
Anonymous
1/14/2001
06:44:03 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
what if i use *31* string code from my telefon line? the ISP wont have my tel number .
AND PLEASE PASTE HERE SOME URLS THAT ENCRYPT DATAS WHICH THE BROWSER SENDS TO ISP
|
tom
1/14/2001
07:35:32 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR67, S:
Please let us know any of the services you know and which you trust on, or let us know any tunneling service or SSL servers that offer URL encryption that you think they work or any URL that you´ve visited to be able to get more information.
|
DAR
1/14/2001
15:02:09 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Freedom from zeroknowledge.com is my recommendation. Freedom allows for the creation of pseudonyms ("nyms") that can't be linked to a real-world identity of a user. They do this by not associating your payment information with your choice of pseudonyms. Once installed, the software catches all outgoing Internet traffic, encrypts the information multiple times, and routes the encrypted data through a network of Freedom Servers located around the world.
Here is a simplified example: picture three servers, A, B & C. The first Freedom server in the route, A, receives encrypted data from a Freedom user. Server A removes a layer of encryption, revealing the IP address of Server B, to which the remaining encrypted payload is then forwarded. Server B receives the data and removes the second layer of encryption, revealing the address of Server C. Server B forwards the encrypted data to Server C. Server C receives the data, decrypts the final layer, and forwards the unencrypted payload to its destination in the internet.
In summary: Server A knows the true IP address of the user and the address of Server B. B knows the addresses of A & C, while C knows the address for B and the final destination for the traffic. No single server has enough information to compromise the privacy of the end user.
Freedom costs $50 for lifetime use. Two cautions here: One – Freedom servers are slow, a 56ker will time out a lot, it can be difficult to use without Cable or DSL. Two – I have it from reliable sources that the NSA (The National Security Agency) has taken a keen interest in them, it’s only a matter of time before they compromise Freedom, if they haven’t already. This shouldn’t be an issue unless your activities are significantly illegal. For that, you need additional and other methods, which I won’t post on a public bulletin board.
|
tom
1/15/2001
06:47:17 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR,
"For that, you need additional and other methods, which I won’t post on a public bulletin board". Could you please give me the information by email?. Thank you in advance.
johnm152@hotmail.com
|
hextazy
1/16/2001
08:05:16 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
OK, i read this and its better than going to the movies!
But there is still one thing you would like to say. The Loveletter-bug guy, wasn't neigher a Hacker or a Cracker . This guy left behind lots of "fingerprints" on his virus!! Ppl how work on the "cure" for compuer viruses tracked him 2 hours after the event! He just was arrested 2-3 days after, coz Sec. Service wanted to be sure that it really was a kiddo doing this big attac and not terrorist! This guy's virus even accesed the Pentagon and lots of other goverment and secret service computers, and everybody thought that this was kind of a conspirancy or something. It was unbelievable, but we still couldn't call this guy a Hacker , cracker, what so ever...
Greetz
hex
BTW. .. i don't like virii programmers! i don't see whats so great about crashing someone elses computer, in fact i think it's stupid !
PD: I take my hat off, DAR and Monica !
I specially enjoyed your posts ! =o)
|
moggie
1/16/2001
08:25:02 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
hi DAR,
can you send me the "additional information and other methods" you meant.i use freedom as well,but actually i didnt know about the NSA.so actually you still dont have any privacy.you just only make it harder for them.
please send it to moggie25@dolfijn.nl
thanks alot DAR!
|
DAR54
1/16/2001
13:51:40 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
To Any & all,
I apologize if I gave anyone the wrong impression; I do not engage, promote, solicit or encourage ANY form of illegal conduct. I will not participate in any discussion or activity of this sort.
|
NSA
1/16/2001
17:44:55 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR54
VERY PRUDENT ON YOUR PART & KEEP IT UP, WE'LL BE LOOKING INTO YOU FROM TIME TO TIME.
JUST BE A GOOD BOY & KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT,OK!
|
DAR76
1/16/2001
19:24:53 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Enrus tuvarkam putolo its pargua behnatu vorapso
bis lopa, itlota morin breho? (CM Norse)
Yipee- Kiyee, Motherfucker.
|
cheznutz5
1/16/2001
20:44:23 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
dudes i hack porn and comps and any shit i can think of i use multi proxy so i cant get traced
|
DAR99
1/17/2001
07:05:29 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
FYI
http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/internetcrime/2000/04/20/hacker0420_01.html
http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/internetcrime/2000/05/15/lovebugid0515_01.html
http://www.apbnews.com/newscenter/internetcrime/2000/03/10/fbicyber0310_01.html
|
bugy
1/17/2001
08:01:18 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR
Write us something more plz we're reading carfully ur articles.
Im sure that u make different orders and other illegal operations in internet, how couldn't they find you, write us something more
|
dj-german
1/17/2001
09:11:43 | No one is anonymus
Message:
Now i have read all your comments.
What is the essence? Are the any solutions?
Let me know...
Danke.
|
DAR_or is that DUH..
1/17/2001
10:52:00 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Today’s tasty Treats.
The Good….
http://packetstorm.securify.com
http://www.cybercrimecorp.com/index2.html
http://www.nlectc.org/
http://www.winmag.com/
The Bad….
http://www.theinformationcenter.com/pub1.htm
http://www.loompanics.com/online-store/scstore/index.html
http://www.antionline.com/archives/text/phrack/
http://www.tsc-global.com/index2.htm
And The Ugly….
http://www.networkusa.org/fingerprint.shtml
http://www.boortz.com/
http://www.antiaging-systems.com/
http://members.bianca.com/shacklet/***Powerslave***/vault.html
“Give a man a fish, he eats for a day; Teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime”.
The Essence? The 5P Principle – Proper Preparation Prevents Poor Performance.
|
dj-germany
1/17/2001
11:25:09 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Hi,Dar or Duh;
you love to speak in paraphrases...? jesus did so too...;-)
but he sayed too: "your speaking should be yes,yes or no,no ".(simply translated into english)
the good, : good sites; harmless sites;helpful sites?
bad and ugly; harmful sites; or not worth to pay attention...?
|
DAR
1/17/2001
11:53:28 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
"Brevity, the soul of wit" - a quotation, not a paraphrase, a REwording of someone's else's discourse.
Tell you what - I won't correct your German, if you'll stay off my English, agreed? :)
The above sites are simply useful to me, a proxiable potpourri of potentialities. Put that in your pipe and smoke it; just killin' time....
Skoal.
|
Snow Blocked
1/19/2001
09:02:34 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Has anyone ever used www.zeropain.com? Is this one safe or a scam??
|
DAR78
1/19/2001
09:51:25 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Snow Blocked,
I would'nt use it. The lack of feature discriptions and the links to Paypal, Gator and the Jackpot sites make me suspicious. I would NEVER link to a site like Paypal through an unknown party.
What do you know about them?
Are you looking for an anonymous and/or relay emailer?
|
King Arthur
1/19/2001
22:32:22 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Well done DAR.
The Good: fairly well reasoned comment on todays issues. I frequent those sites myself.
The Bad: no other word for it, they are bad, false information from people who panic.
The Ugly: a matter of opinion I suppose. At least now I know where to go to get some porn movies should I tire of Gwenivere (not bloddy likely).
As well as 5P don't forget KISS (Keep It Simple Silly).
There is no such thing as absolute anonymity. There is no such thing as absolute security. Both are relative terms. We do the best we can to maximize both while minimizing inconvenience. You could pour concrete over your computer to prevent the computer's theft but how well could you use it after the concrete hardend? Would that stop the thief with a jackhammer?
Yes, I do believe from independent (I do believe they are independent of yours) sources, DAR that the NSA has taken an interest in Zero Knowledge and their product Freedom. Since I know the principals involved in ZK I can state that NSA is going to have a very difficult time cracking that system. The designer is one of the best non-govermental experts on cryptography in the world today. The design of the Freedom Network is good and solid. It is designed to make traffic analsys _very_ difficult. The cyphers used are, while not proven unbreakable, at least believed to be very, very difficult to crack.
The major problem I've found with Freedom is that some sites refuse you entry when you use Freedom. These have, for me, broken down into two groups, the government, we have a right to know who you are, sites and the commercial, we want to sell you everything, sites. Oh well, Caveat Emptor and all that.
Enough, Gwenie is tugging on my arm.
Regards,
A. Pendragon.
|
Misery
1/20/2001
00:10:13 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR,
When you go online, how many proxies do you use for posts such as this?
In other words, what software and service do you use to protect your computer from attacks and your surfing from being traced back to you?
|
freieRede
1/20/2001
00:58:58 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR*.* = F.o.S.
|
Anonymous
1/20/2001
07:55:50 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR
www.zeropain.com is it a goodsiteor just a fakeone?
|
Anonymous
1/20/2001
08:17:48 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Your browser is not using 128 bit encryption, which certain Web sites require.
SafeWeb can still connect you but this might circumvent
the intent of the Web site's security policy.
I CANT USE SAFEWEB.com
HELP ME
|
Anonymous
1/20/2001
08:36:24 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Your browser is not using 128 bit encryption, which certain Web sites require.
SafeWeb can still connect you but this might circumvent
the intent of the Web site's security policy.
WHATS THIS, I CANT USE SAFEWEB, HELP ME PLS
|
Keebler
1/20/2001
10:18:15 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
www.zeropain is a fake no doubt about it. When you use them and check yourself using a proxy judge or whatever the only thing that shows up is zeropains' IP and windows ver everything else shows up as null. Obviously a fake.
|
poe
1/20/2001
11:04:43 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
The proxies I use are quite good. When I go to an env. check the only thing that shows is the proxy ip thats it!
|
DAR123
1/20/2001
14:16:47 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
King Arthur,
Headings that are more appropriate might have been the good guys, the bad guys and the miscellaneous; doesn’t fit well in a movie reference.
Have to disagree with you about The Bad, they are socially and politically whack but there’s some unusual, solid information there for those so inclined.
Agreed, Freedom is technically solid; they’re more likely to be compromised internally, through agent placement, mole creation, and/or buying into the system. Tech Firms are often poorly equipped to deal with the human elements.
I used Freedom when it first started, didn’t have the server lockout problem; is ZKI addressing this?
Misery,
I am on a Fortune 100 network that is similar to Freedom. If I wasn’t I would use Freedom. If not Freedom, then A4 with the rotating proxies, HTTP request blanking, IP spoofing and the cookie blocking features. I also recommend Zonealarm, Trojan Defense System 3, PC InvestigatorHook Protect, Scramdisk, Evidence Eliminator and Norton AV. I’ve changed my networking ID in Control panel, altered my user.dat and index.dat files in Windows, and rewritten my system reg. #s with Windows Registration Editor. These apps are available at places like zdnet. The weakness here would still be, of course, my ISP connection.
Bottom line, IF I was a crook, I’d steal offline, there’s too many ways to be tripped up here. This I know, being a former DOJ Investigator.
FreieRede,
Back at ya, I know what I know.
Anonymous,
You need the 128bit-encryption upgrade from MS, suppose Netscape has the same.
|
freieRede
1/20/2001
15:21:37 | Re: DAR *.*
Message:
"former DOJ Investigator?"
Kennen Sie Ken Starr?
DAR*.* = F.o.S. (voll von der Scheiße)
|
S
1/20/2001
21:12:46 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR:
Do you know anything about SiegePipe?
|
216.115.108.243
1/20/2001
23:34:30 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Apparently no one here knows the secrets to staying absolutly anon. There is such a thing, but if certain people go about spouting sinking ships, it won't stay that way for long:) It is my humble oppinion that the only one here that might have a clue is DAR or freieRede and they're not saying a (hole) lot, not that I blame them. Secrets are hard to come by and easily lost to 1@murs. Ihaka Iyanka Wicasa Hemiyedo.
Krypto kills superman and frees the slaves. 1ong live the IDEA.
freeSpeech
"(voll von der Scheiße)"
Das ist sehr lustig:)
schreiben Sie mehr.
|
DAR
1/21/2001
09:14:43 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
OK. Here it is the nonspecific answer to the $64,000 Question “How do I stay totally anonymous on the net"? aka "How do I hack and crack with impunity?"
Before I go any further, let me say that this info's no secret, it's being discussed everyday on hacker boards, has been for years and years. It's also lawful for me to make a GENERALIZED statement without providing real assistance to anyone. Though, this is dangerous ground. Ok, whatever; onward.
The weak link is always your initial connection to your ISP, you have to go in as someone else .
How? You steal another's username & password and dialin from a phone you're not associated to; or you have remote access to someone else's home PC, no connect logging here, then connect from there. All methods are just variations on this non-association, no traceable connection to you. DUH….
THEN, the other aspects like proxies come in to play.
Listen up - IF YOU NEED ME TO TELL YOU THIS, IN AS BROAD A WAY AS THIS, YOU BETTER KEEP YOUR SIMPLE, IGNORANT ASS OFFLINE; OTHERWISE IT'S GOING TO JAIL!!
Two words for ya.- GANG RAPE. Seriously.Think about it.
Professional crime is like professional sports - Very few are hardworking or talented enough, If you ARE you make a fortune and f*** those fine cheerleaders, if you're NOT you're broke, busted and probably getting F***** by Leroy and company . Hammer or nail, VERY Darwinian.
Time to get off the moral highhorse, pack up the soapbox, talk to ya later.
S, go with Freedom, better quality at the same price.
|
King Arthur
1/24/2001
12:46:09 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Hello once again DAR,
Ex Military Intelligence here. Yes, I know, the original oxymoron.
Re Is ZK addressing the server lockouts. To the best of my knowledge yes. How? I can't say. You are quite correct in your assesment of the methods of penetration. They are aware of them and taking steps to prevent such penetration.
Re your answer to the 64,000 $ question. Try again. That may work from time to time but all connections, phone calls included, are logged. Someone may see you at the payphone and give you up under questioning, the possibilites are limitless. Multiple connections at the same time are frowned on by most ISP's and heavily logged. So if you steal a UN/PW and login while the legitimate user is on line, bingo they've got you. If you are wanted badly enough, the manpower will be at your location within a very brief time, usually less than 2 min.
Remote access to someone else's PC means at least two phone lines to that PC, again the call in will be logged by the telco. Oh, I count the xDSL connection in this case as one line. Yep, don't be associated with the crime is the best method, ie. don't do it.
DAR you left out the important part, after GANG RAPE comes "Dead men tell no tales."
Regards,
A. Pendragon
|
DAR
1/24/2001
18:27:54 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
So, The next time I use my Mishkin cell clone in Detroit to pretext the PBX operator at FedEx in Miami, who connects me to the outside line to access the Subseven server on Poe’s PC while he’s at work in Anaheim to jack into your DIA file in Arlington, I should expect the DIS to be on me in, excuse me, how long, under two minutes?
Yeah.
Or maybe I’ll forgo the operator and use those $10 plans I bought on the net and $50 in Radio Shack parts to build a phone relay to plant in that apartment basement junction box to place the call, whaddya think?
Payphones? Think I’ll leave those to the crack dealers.
|
poe
1/25/2001
12:37:02 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
YOU BETTER NOT BE REFFERING TO MY PC BECAUSE I'LL FUCK YOU IN THE ASS WITH A BRICK ! YOU ARE NOT FUNNY .
|
216.32.120.133
1/25/2001
13:14:50 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Yea SubSeven is tricky that way, pack an unpacked server with some obscure packer and it will pass most virus shields. Log (sniff) the ip of some unsuspecting forum visitor, find the weak link (open ports) slip in the payload and bam....Poe gets a little slower connection to the internet.
I wouldn't worry though,
"poe
1/20/2001
11:04:43 RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
The proxies I use are quite good. When I go to an env. check the only thing that shows is the proxy ip thats it!"
NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
|
DAR
1/25/2001
16:09:45 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Calm down, Poe. If I was using you, would I say so? I’m not a hacker, I work the other side.
You’re just part of a retort to the King’s statements that all calls are easily traced. Anyone with even moderate knowledge can prevent the tracing of a call’s origin.
The King has a belief that Law Enforcement and Bell are quick and effective; I disagree.
|
Boys, boys . . .
1/25/2001
23:31:24 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
Gentlemen, gentlemen, gentlemen . . .
"ya see that?"
I dunno Moe, looks like an FBI agent to me!
Nyuk, nyuk nyuk!
"Pick two!"
Okay, one from the FBI, one from the CIA!
NSA, lamebrain, NSA!
Awwh, the Echelon guys!
My point is NO ONE can use their system, any system, with impunity. Probably the best way would be to spoof through multiple servers. But even then, unless you can somehow change the physical location your dialing in from, how could they NOT catch you? Maybe if you used a really bad foreign ISP, like hackerzhimmel.org?
|
204.198.132.9
1/26/2001
12:48:16 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
"My point is NO ONE can use their system, any system, with impunity. (Whatever) Probably the best way would be to spoof through multiple servers.(Yea Right, that is as close to a 2 min track as it gets) But even then, unless you can somehow change the physical location your dialing in from,(There ya go) how could they NOT catch you? Maybe if you used a really bad foreign ISP, like hackerzhimmel.org? (Huh?)"
What's with the NSA CIA FBI stuff?
NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS has to be the funniest, longest most entertaining post I've ever seen on this forum. Truly amazing. lol
|
gabriel
1/26/2001
14:21:15 | RE: NO-ONE IS ANONYMOUS
Message:
DAR123:
"I’ve changed my networking ID in Control panel, altered my user.dat and index.dat files in Windows, and rewritten my system reg. #s with Windows Registration Editor."
hey dar,
if you're still around, can you expand on this a little more? in particular, how do i alter my user.dat & index.dat files? as well, with cable modem, they give you a unique networking ID. Can it be changed, and still have the connection working? one last thing, what is ip spoofing exactly?
sorry if these questions are perhaps obvious, but I'm relatively new to the whole privacy/anonymous aspect of the net.
thanks kindly, for your time.
|
|
Post a reply to this message:
|
