Business. A Political Economist’s View of Modern Methods of Money Making.* (New York: The New York Times, Nov. 26, 1904, p. BR820) * The Theory of Business Enterprise. By Thorstein Veblen, Assistant Professor of Political Economy in the University of Chicago. Pp. vii.-400. Cloth. 8vo. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. $1.50. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “No SINGLE factor in the present cultural situation,” in the opinion of Prof. Veblen, “has an importance equal to the business man and his work.” And he has discussed the theory of business enterprise to the extent of 400 pages so intensely as to stimulate if he does not gratify or convince his reader. No doubt is left in the reader’s mind about the purpose of the modern business man. He is primarily a seeker for gains. By his development of the “machine process” he has contrived to dominate the world. Sovereigns, dynasties, legislatures, the aristocrats, and the vulgar are controlled by him in his search for profits. Not all business men are aware how profoundly their changing customs are modifying the habits of thought of the world. To many who are governed by the principles discussed by Prof. Veblen this book may come as an interesting expression of opinions held but not hitherto formulated by them. “The Machine Process”, meaning all mechanical methods, the whole concert of industrial operations, with weights, measures, goods and labor standardized, has become so controlling that any departure from its rule may have far-reaching and important consequences. The business man now invests in the processes of industry, and instead of staking values in dimly seen conjunctures of the season and the act of God, he turns to the conjunctures arising from the interplay of the industrial processes, which are in great measure under the control of business men. Pecuniary manipulation plays a more and more important part, coalition and competition are invoked to maintain or disturb the industrial balance. Business is a strife without sentiment for the acquisition of wealth. Industry is carried on for the sake of business, and not conversely. In all things the man of business is very practical, seeking ever to “turn” an opponent, to secure more efficient organization and further profits. Mere question if serviceability and aesthetic aspirations are to be controlled: In common with other men, the business man is moved by ideals of serviceability, and an aspiration to make the way of life easier for his fellows. Like other men, he has something of the instinct of workmanship. No doubt such aspirations move the great business man less urgently than many others, who are on that account less successful in business affairs. Motives of this kind detract from business efficiency, and an undue yielding to them on the part of business men is to be deprecated as an infirmity. Business is largely strategy, governed by exigencies calling for the exercise of keen judgment and common sense. While the adage that “Honesty is the best policy” seems on the whole to have been accepted, the author cites the case, under modern circumstances, where the discretionary head of a large enterprise is removed from personal contact with the customers for whom the industrial process under his control purveys goods or services. Transactions take on an impersonal character. One can with an easier conscience and with less of a sense of meanness take advantage of the necessities of people whom one knows of only as an indiscriminate aggregate of consumers. Particularly is this true when, as frequently happens in the modern situation, this body of consumers belongs in the main to another, inferior, class, so that personal contact and cognizance of them is not only not contemplated, but is in a sense impossible. Equity, in excess of the formal modicum specified by law, does not so readily assert its claims where the relations between the parties are remote and impersonal as where one is dealing with one’s necessitous neighbors who live on the same social plane. Under these circumstances the adage cited above loses much of its axiomatic force. Business management has a chance to proceed on a temperate and sagacious calculation of profit and loss, untroubled by sentimental considerations of human kindness or irritation or of honesty. Following a most interesting chapter on “Business Enterprise” as it looks to the author is one on “The Use of Loan Credit,” which has already received wide consideration by many students of finance. The traffic in vendible capital is regarded as something different from common speculation on the stock market, as it calls for knowledge of business principles. Its rewards are the richest prizes of business: The traffic in vendible capital is not without its speculative risks, but the risks which it creates fall with relatively greater weight upon the business men who are not immediately concerned in this traffic. Indeed, so secure and lucrative is this class of business that it is chiefly out of gains accruing, directly and indirectly, from such traffic in vendible capital that the great modern fortunes are being accumulated; and both the rate and the magnitude of these accumulations, whether taken absolutely or relatively to the total increase of wealth, surpass all recorded phenomena of their kind. The author’s theorizing about crises, depressions, hard times, dull times, brisk times, periods of speculative advance, eras of prosperity, all phenomena of price disturbance, is interesting: Depression is a malady of the affections, caused by a discrepancy between the nominal capitalization which business men have set their hearts upon and that actual capitalizable value of their property which is current earning capacity will warrant. Whatever its cause, it has been a chronic condition, we are told, since the seventies, and business men earnestly seek a remedy for it. One of the results of the development of modern business methods is the growth of Socialism. Trusts are discussed as a development of the business effort to check depression by regulation “cut-throat” competition – not always with benefit to consumers. Law and politics feel the effects of the new methods of business. Governments side with business men. The “machine process” is daily leading business men and those engaged in industrial occupations to constantly diverging points of view, with increasing difficulty in understanding each other. The desire to render industrial labor more mobile for the purposes of the “machine process” is discouraging thrift and the desire of the workingman to own his home. Trades-unionism as a development of modern business methods is considered at length and with reference to the changed attitude of the industrial classes in relation to the old beliefs about natural rights and freedom of contract. The future as forecast by Prof. Veblen does not look bright, but troubled. Charity organizations, clubs, and societies for social purity, for amusement, education, and manual training of indigent classes, for colonization of the poor, for popularization of churches, for clean politics, for cultural missionary work by social settlements and the like, are characterized as bound to be futile to correct the cultural trend of the “machine” discipline. Nothing can serve as that corrective that cannot be put in the form of a business proposition: It is not a question of what ought to be done, but of what is the course laid out by business principles; the discretion rests with the business men, not with the moralists, and the business men’s discretion is bounded by the exigencies of business enterprise. Even the business men cannot allow themselves to play fast and loose with business principles in response to a call from humanitarian motives. The question therefore remains, on the whole, a question of what the business men may be expected to do for cultural growth on the motive of profits. The author admits that the full dominion of business enterprise is necessarily a transitory dominion. How it has come to its present estate, why it must follow its present trend and why it stands to lose in the end, must be left to readers of the book. ------------------------------------------------------- End ---------------------