At 80 years of age, Turkey is a vigorous, if chaotic,
hard-working country, with an anachronistic personality cult, a vast
ungainly bureaucracy, a suspicious army and judiciary, and an
inexperienced but well-meaning, moderately pro-Islamic government.
European Union membership is generally seen as desirable, but
analysts rightly worry whether the EU really wants Turkey.
Turkey anxiously awaits to start accession
negotiations with the EU
To the south, the small island of Cyprus casts a long shadow over
accession talks. And to the east, the continuing violence in Iraq
both tempts and repels Turkish involvement. As a regional power, it
wants to help establish stability there and reap the economic
benefits, but as a former imperial power, its every word or deed
provokes accusations of interference and future conquest. Hanging
over the east of Turkey, and the northern provinces of Iraq, is the
unsolved question of the future of the unfortunate Kurds.
On Nov. 5, the EU published its annual report on the progress of
all EU candidate countries. For Turkey, this year’s report was
crucial – a detailed measure of the progress made, and the measures
still required.
The country became a candidate in 1999, and is impatient for a
date for accession talks to start. At the EU summit at the end of
last year, Turkey was given another two years to satisfy ‘Copenhagen
criteria’ – the democratic and human rights preconditions spelt out
by the EU, before any country can seriously be considered for
membership. In December 2004, another EU summit will decide whether
Turkey has satisfied those conditions. If so, accession negotiations
– which would inevitably take several years – could begin early in
2005.
Turkey could then be expected to join early in the second decade
of the 21st century.
In the eyes of the EU, human rights issues are the
main obstacle for Turkey to overcome
The tone of the EU’s report was friendlier than any previous
assessment. Key legislation on human rights was praised – the
Turkish Government has passed seven packages of reforms in its one
year in power. But some legislation is still needed. And the proof
of the pudding, say European commissioners, will be in the eating.
Though many laws have been passed, little has changed on the ground.
The next 12 months will be tense, as various bodies try to monitor
the work of the police, prosecutors and judges to assess whether
peaceful demonstrations are allowed, whether writers, journalists,
human rights activists and ordinary people can express non-violent
views without fear of arrest and prosecution, whether, and how Kurds
and other ethnic or religious minorities can express their cultures,
and whether the army can refrain, or be restrained, from overt
interference in politics.
From a Hungarian perspective, the picture in some ways resembles
the battle between reformers and hardliners in the late 1980s. But
the picture in Turkey is further complicated by what people know
here as ‘the deep state’ – the generals, judges and university
rectors who maintain their own power at the expense of individual
liberties. Their main claim to respectability lies in portraying
themselves as defenders of the secular nature of the republic,
against the wicked, but largely non-existent Islamists, who aim to
undermine them.
A weekday morning at the Police Academy in Elmadag – Apple Hill –
on the outskirts of Ankara looks something like this: professor
Vahit Bicak strolls easily down corridors crowded with police cadets
– waiting for their classes to start – chatting with past and
present students. At his side is a thin, frail inspector, in charge
of all investigations of alleged police ill treatment in Turkey. On
one staircase, we meet a man with a steel handshake – Turkey’s No. 2
police officer.
Other staff smile nervously at our approach. Professor Bicak is
the head of the human rights presidency within Prime Minister Tayyip
Erdogan’s office. He is the person with the main responsibility for
making sure Turkey fulfills the Brussels human rights criteria. His
22-member staff monitors all human rights complaints in Turkey, and
have a hot line to top ministers to propose changes in legislation
and implementation. In the labyrinthine world of Turkish
bureaucracy, he can take more short cuts than most.
The classroom is freshly painted with a predilection for blues.
Blue desks, blue uniforms and blue decorations on the walls. Forty
cadets – 39 boys and one girl, leap to attention as we enter.
A compromise on Cyprus is necessary
Professor Bicak runs through the gamut of his favorite subjects –
torture in custody, beatings and so forth. The class listens
attentively. The majority of police cadets in my classes fully
support the reforms, Bicak says afterwards. He believes it will
improve their prestige in society and give them the chance to clear
their names, if false allegations of mistreatment are lodged against
them.
He is more reluctant to pinpoint where the opposition lies. The
class is frequently interrupted by the crackle of small-arms fire –
they’re just practicing, he jokes. One cadet quickly closes the
window. There’s a police shooting range nearby.
One problem is that it’s not entirely clear what peoples’ rights
are to demonstrate, says Jonathan Sugden, a researcher on Turkey for
Human Rights Watch, a non-governmental agency. It’s not clear to the
police, it’s not clear to the public. And that vagueness is a recipe
for confrontation – which happens almost every day.
Sugden
praises Turkey’s judges, for increasingly throwing out cases that,
in his view, should not have been prosecuted in the first place. But
he blames prosecutors for continuing to bring them. “By and large
the prosecutors here don’t seem to have got the message ... We see a
lot of cases being opened against people who are discussing or
criticizing the role of the army in Turkish politics, or saying that
they would like to see their ethnicity reflected in politics.’’
Certain state bodies, like the Higher Education Board (YOK) and
the Supreme Board of Radio and Television (RTUK) wield considerable
power. The new government is trying to clip their wings, but despite
enjoying 368 seats in the 550- member Turkish Parliament, it is too
weak to confront secular authorities. At the Mesopotamian
Cultural Center in Istanbul, a bookshop sells CDs and tapes of
Kurdish songs banned from broadcast on Turkish radio, and staff
grumble that it is still impossible to hold even private Kurdish
classes. They cite one recent case from the town of Batman, in
eastern Turkey, where a class failed to get permission to hold a
Kurdish class because council officials said the door was five
centimeters too narrow. Put such complaints to Bicak, and he
replies: “Of course there are bureaucrats looking for excuses. The
trick is not to give them any.’’ Bicak’s human rights’ presidency
has two main tools to get things done. At the top, there are monthly
meetings of Turkey’s Reform Monitoring Group, which includes three
ministers, and has ultimate power to pass decrees and clear away
what is called ‘secondary legislation,’ which often prevents the
implementation of laws passed by parliament. At a local level, local
reform committees, answerable to Bicak’s office, include regional
governors, and members of the bar association who have the right to
inspect police stations and prisons.
Sugden of Human Rights Watch praises the new steps but fears
Bicak’s office is too small, with an insufficient budget for this
vast country of 70 million people. He calls it a small engine for
a very big ship. Integration into Europe has been Turkey’s top
foreign policy goal since 1923. Human rights implementation is the
single biggest obstacle. He believes many more resources should be
put into it. Another problem overshadowing EU accession for
Turkey is Cyprus. On May 1, Cyprus will join the EU, along with nine
other countries including Hungary. But the island has remained
divided into Turkish and Greek areas since the 1974 war. A United
Nations plan was largely agreed upon last year, but the Turkish
government of Rauf Denktas in the north was blamed for blocking a
final agreement. Elections will be held in the north on Dec. 14. The
EU is hoping the more pro-EU leftists will win, and remove the last
obstacles. Cyprus could then join the EU as a re-united island. If
the conservative nationalists stay in power, that would be more
difficult. According to this year’s European Commission report on
Turkey, the absence of a settlement could become a serious obstacle
to Turkey’s EU aspirations.
That sent frissons of alarm down many Turkish spines. If the
nationalists win again in December, Erdogan’s government in Ankara
may try to force acceptance of the UN plan – against army and
nationalist opposition in mainland Turkey.
As with human rights legislation, that policy would run the risk
that Turkey makes all the concessions required by the EU, and then
still fails to be given an accession date. And that could provoke
serious backlash.
The anti-Turkish lobby in EU states remains strong – not least
for practical, rather than ideological reasons. The population of
Turkey could one day outstrip that of Germany. That would make it
the biggest country in a future EU – outside one day, in a position
of considerable power the next. Another fear in Brussels is of an
influx of millions of Turkish workers.
One headache for Turkish leaders has however eased – the question
of whether or not to send troops to Iraq. On Oct. 7, Turkey’s
Parliament approved a government proposal to send up to 10,000
troops. Special training began, military vehicles were loaded onto
trains and Turkish-Arabic phrase books issued. But bitter opposition
to Turkish involvement by the interim Iraqi Governing Council (IGC),
and the failure of Americans to foresee the problem, or to persuade
the IGC back down, led to a change of heart in Ankara. No Turkish
troops will now be sent, and the way is open for Turkey to take part
in the rebuilding of Iraq in other, more peaceful ways.
On his pedestal, surrounded by a sea of flowers, a stern Ataturk
looks down on a country that has loyally followed his words for 80
years. A strong wind batters Istanbul. Somewhere below my office, a
window swings off its hinges and shatters. The traffic restarts. But
where is the kitten? |