| HiLightOnline registry of ideas |
|
However, the crisis may just seem too heavy, and it might be overcome by mere reorganization of human communications. This is much like filtering off the noise from a radio signal. Thus, an average scientific paper contains less than 5% of really valuable information, the rest of the text being the guise needed to give the paper a "scientific" look and to convince the reviewers that there is nothing really new in it, save a very timid extension of the knowledge already gained. Scientific literature is most repetitive and replete with unnecessary references and quotes, fearing to offend anybody. This holds for both natural sciences (including physics and mathematics) and humanities.
So, if one could say directly what one wants to, without side reverences, self-advertising or disguise, the total volume of information communicated would be drastically diminished. The elimination of professional barriers would make the thoughts and ideas much more communicable and more suited for further development and implementation. Finally, the condensed style of communication would make it possible to centralize publishing, thus avoiding the necessity to browse numerous scholarly journals for an idea.
The HiLight project is an alternative to the traditional ways of publishing the results of research in any field, promoting free, honest and unprejudiced interdisciplinary communication between people of quite different education and origin. This is the first attempt to cultivate a new style of communication which would make people forget about information boom and cultural crisis. Hopefully, the example of HiLight will be followed by the other publishers, and the ideas built in it will be further refined and brought to life.