truthsavvy online
HomeArchive 1Archive 2ACLU ExposedGuest Commentary Web News LinksContact

TruthSavvyOnline
"The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 10:2

 

Which Do You Believe?

I am a Republican! Not so much for economics' sake but more for morality's sake.
When it comes to laws regarding pornography, abortion, homosexuality, prayer in schools and other religious freedoms, there is such a clear difference between the way Democrats and Republicans vote, time after time. Voting records are a matter of public record and anyone who cares enough to inquire can see how the two parties vote down party lines on these issues and many others. Of course, if you don't care about God, Godly morals or Godly values, or the difference in the records, then you'll vote Democrat anyway.

Republicans vote for religious freedoms and against the murdering of babies (abortion - such an unconscionable, unattached word isn't it), pornography, and homosexuality nearly across the board. Democrats, so predictably, vote just the opposite and oppose what is good and right and support sinful practice even with tax dollars!

How can you read the Bible that says homosexuality is an abomination to God (Leviticus 18:22) for example and then turn right around and go to the polls and vote for someone who promotes homosexuality at every turn? How can you believe in a God that teaches that the gift of life is sacred and then go to the polls and vote for people who don't think so; who believe in murdering the
unborn and those that are NEWBORN?

John Adams stated in October 1798, "We have no government armed with power which is capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Our Constitution will only work for those people who can control themselves by religious values."

Democrats believe...

Republicans believe...

...that our Founding Fathers did not really mean what they said when they guaranteed certain constitutional rights such as the right to freedom of religious expression, the right to keep and bear arms, and the right to retain the use of private property. They only recognize these rights when it is to their advantage. They reverse "rights" with "privileges" at their whim of necessity (when it benefits them). They are using our Constitution against us. Maybe you've noticed lately! ...that the United States was founded on the fundamental principle that individuals have certain rights and freedoms which cannot be infringed upon and may be restricted only to the degree necessary to preserve the rights of others. There is a difference in rights and privileges and we know this difference.
...government has a right to use your money as it sees fit to redistribute wealth (which is Communism/Socialism), establish new spending programs in times of budget surpluses, and to return to you only that portion of your money which is politically expedient. As you can tell by your paycheck. That amount that the government LETs you keep is getting smaller and smaller, isn't it! ...the money you earn is yours and that government in a free society has the right to take only as much as is needed to perform those limited functions, which are appropriate to it. The House of Reps. handles the purse!
...American society must redefine its values and the role of the family to fit new lifestyle concepts, which have resulted from the 60's counter-culture movement and an attitude that promotes an abrogation of individual responsibility. They set values by the minorities. If they can't do it by the Constitution, then they go ahead and do it anyway, whether the majority wants it or not (i.e. ERA movement). ...the traditional family and the values it fosters are the foundation of American society and their preservation is essential to our Nation's continued success. Any change in this is a change in the DNA of our nation.
...the federal government has the right to determine the values which will be taught in public schools and parents' choice of schools must be limited to avoid exposing public schools to competitive forces which would encourage reform and increase accountability. Socialist governments set their public schools' curriculum to their agendas. Sound familiar? ...parents have the right to determine the values with which their children will be raised and to have the widest possible choice among public, private and religious schools and that competition will improve public education. Parents have the right to determine the values with which their children will be taught in the home and in the public school system (in society as a whole).
...that government regulation and federal control of economic activity can better distribute wealth and services to the American people. Remember! Redistribute of Wealth is a Communist/Socialist agenda term. ..that the free enterprise system is the most effective engine of economic progress. They know this as we do unless they're gunning for the socialistic system...which they are!
...penalizing achievement with higher taxes and increased government bureaucracy and spending will not stifle economic growth but instead guarantee prosperity for everyone. Again, this is a socialist agenda. ...high taxes, runaway government spending, and over-regulation of business and farming punishes initiative and stifle and penalizes economic growth.
...individual behavior, including criminal behavior, can be blamed on "society" and that spending on social welfare programs and improvements in prison living conditions can combat crime. Our prisons are getting over crowded so that should tell the democrats one thing; out society they are creating stinks of decay. ...that with freedom comes responsibility and that individuals must take personal responsibility for their own actions and our criminal justice system must be based on this idea. We see the need for a complete overhaul of our criminal justice system. It is entirely out of hand!
...the government has the right to regulate the use of private property in accordance with narrow special interests without giving just compensation to owners. They will "take"...I mean "buy" your property at their set value...not the markets. If you don't accept their price, they'll take it anyway and throw you out on your ears. ...that your property is yours and you have the basic right to make use of it without unreasonable government restrictions. And should not be penalized for handing it down to your children as their inheritance.
...we can afford to drastically weaken our military despite the threats present in an unstable, post-Cold War international environment and the United States must subjugate its interests to those of the United Nations. One World-Global agenda. Shifting all of Americas' rights and powers to the United Nations under one umbrella folks! ...the preservation of our rights and freedoms must be entrusted to a strong national defense and of the ability of the United States to negotiate with other nations from a position of strength. And there is a difference in the words "strength" and "sensitivity".
...that America must adopt a politically correct, multi-cultural set of values which denies common American heritage and will further divide American society. If we object, they will build more jails FOR US! ...it is imperative today to re-affirm the traditional freedoms and values of America to preserve our great Republic.
...that all whom oppose them are to be treated as enemies and criminals. They will build more jails unless you "bow down to Baal". Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you!
...there can be differences of opinion and that such differences should result in opponents, not enemies.
...that some must give up a portion of their rights, freedoms and your paycheck, that others may enjoy those same rights and freedoms. ...that all of America's citizens can enjoy the rights and freedoms of our country without diminishing the rights of others.
...that loyalty to a discredited leader is a virtue and if other office holders have committed indiscretions, a sitting office holder should not be criticized for failing to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct. Moral conduct is no longer a word to be used in our vocabulary unless it is lacking in their opposition.
...that public servants, particularly those whom we elect to office, must be held accountable to the highest standards of ethical conduct.
"If a man cannot be trusted with the government of himself, can he be trusted with the government of others?" [Thomas Jefferson]
...that separation of church and state (so-called by the liberals) means that government "owned" property, (WHAT!-I THOUGHT "WE THE PEOPLE" OWNED IT) can not exhibit any "religious" object(s) or that "religion" can not be used in any OBJECTION or OPPOSITION of or to any immoral government law(s) such as "abortion" (infanticide), or immoral deviant behavior, preference or status. ...that separation of church and state means there is no place in government for religion.

...Democratic committee, the party, "looks forward to the day when all citizens may vote their conscience without their political beliefs being dictated to them by politically involved religious leaders, regardless of denomination."

"American democracy is rooted in the principle of the separation of church and state," the statement continued.

...that (so-called by the liberals) separation of church and state means our government shall not establish a religion for this country (a national religion)...

Bill of Rights Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

...like the Church of England prior to our forefathers coming to this land of the free, the United States of America.
...that our nation achieved its greatness by a Higher Power than ourselves.

I guess, if one has wholesome morals and values and didn't attend any church, but disagree with the "government" on homosexuality, adultery, abortion, and promiscuousness, then they would be considered a "religious person holding religious ideals", therefore, guilty of being influenced by a religious organization or denomination. Therefore, not being capable of voting their conscience. As if, somehow, one can divorce ones conscience from dictating their beliefs, whether religious or not. To Democrats, as long as your conscience is void of any "religious" belief, you are smart enough to vote.

Maybe they should throw out most of our laws because they were based on the first settlers' "religious" beliefs, morals and values here in America. Could it be that is why they are working so hard to create an
amoral society?

Two rule books, one for liberals, and one for conservative politics.

I have never heard such STUPIDITY in my life. What planet did these asinine jokers come from? I had to ask didn't I!

   
   
   
   
   



Copyright©2008 TruthSavvyOnline. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 
 
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1