HomeArchive 1Archive 2ACLU ExposedGuest Commentary Web News LinksContact

Public Officials across America are charging that voicing and expressing our opinions aganist Sodomy is "hateful", therefore, preaching the Bible is tantamount to "fighting words." It does not matter that accepting, voicing and expressing approval of Sodomy is tantamount to "fighting words" to us.

As Canada is a socialistic nation, so America is becoming.

Christians in Placerville, Calif., took a 'rightful' stand against those who engage in sodomy. In expressing their stand with large truck signs saying "Homosexuality is sin," a Placerville business owner told the City Council, "Signs expressing hate of a specific lifestyle are not a way to greet people." A sign which reads "Homosexuality is sin" is now considered an expression of hate? He made it sound as if expressing a stand against an abnormal "lifestyle" is considered somehow wrong? I can just hear him telling John The Baptist this. After all, John The Baptist expressed his message against the King for his adulterous lifestyle.

I can just hear those anti-religious uneducated nuts chiming "yes but John The Baptist had his head removed by the king for saying that."

All I have to say about that is -- Yes he did. The difference is, John The Baptist is in Heaven with "The King of Kings and Lord of Lords" and the king is NOT!

Knowledge = Wisdom!

The pro-sin groups, once again, mobilized and began their usual tedious redundant chants about so-called "hate speech" and so-called "violation of civil rights." As a result of this special interest groups pressure, on Feb. 10, 2005, this Placerville Mayor, Robby Colvin, cranked out a proclamation declaring Placerville a "hate-free zone," thereby, unconstitutionally declaring anyone who takes a stand in expression against the sins, the perversion of Sodomy, to be a criminal of "hate-speech," and "violator of civil rights."

What this mayor doesn't realize, this goes both ways. Mayor Colvin has declared his own "hate-speech" and "violator of civil rights" toward the Christian. This is a personal attack on Christians' freedom of speech and civil rights. This is anti-Christian bigotry. This is an improper and excessive use of civil authority to persecute religion. Mayor Colvin has declared civil government to be at war with Christianity.

Special-interest groups have been trying for many years to crush free speech of decent citizens expressing their oppositions to the perversion of Sodomy using local governments and it is spreading like a toxic run-away train.

Our public officials back down, tails between their legs, at displaying the Ten Commandments in government buildings, reciting their uneducated and erroneous chants of not wanting to "violate the United States Constitution" when in fact, they don't know the first thing about the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

The self-appointed Godfather of our civil rights, the "Unamerican Civil Liberties Union" have brainwashed our elected officals into believing that our First Amendment to the Constitution reads "separation of church and state".

This ACLU, being the unelected, self-proclaimed and self-appointed guardian and defender of public morals--of our religous "Civil Rights" is in fact, standing in violation of our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Putting the Ten Commandments on display in the Capitol rotunda, or any other government building for that matter, has nothing to do with Congress making or establishing any religion. If it does, then we have laws on our books now that should be removed because they are taken from the 10 Commandments. The 10 Commandments are the foundation which we base our laws upon.

The Godfather ACLU had better step in at a murder trial, a larceny/grand theft, extortion trial, etc., and proclaim it unconstitutional to prosecute a person on these grounds because, after all, our "Thou Shalt Not Kill" "Thou Shalt Not Steal" laws were taken from the 10 Commandments. Most felonious acts on our books today are taken from the 10 Commandments.

So if this ACLU has proclaimed its protests against the 10 Commandments being displayed throughout our government, whether on walls, free standing, on a document, or as a philosophical 'moral' foundation, (all on our behalf), then our felonious laws and charges against a person doing a felony that is based on the moral foundation of the 10 Commandments is, in effect, in violation.

What is the difference in accepting the 10 Commandments in philosophy or doctrine, accepting as authoritative, building our laws on its moral foundations, putting them into our laws and the visible exhibition of them? We put these laws on paper for the record books but putting them on a stone tablet, wall, or monument is not acceptable? What deception by the self-appointed Godfather of our Civil Rights has made of this! Talk about morons!

No folks! The First Amendment does not enact a 'wall' between church and state that must be kept high and impregnable. Only in the sense that the state (government) can not tell us who to worship, where to worship, and why worship. They can not set a particular "religion" for us to follow as the "Church Of England" did before America was birthed.

They can not create a "Church of the United States" and require everyone to belong to and attend it.

Our government, the states, can not enact a state church. That's the First Amendment my friend. Not the version of the Unamerican Civil Liberties Union as they would have you believe.

The First Amendment to the Constitution reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Can't you see what the "Godfather" of deception, the ACLU, is trying to do in this country? It's so obvious.

The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to strengthen our civil rights, and that these rights were given to us by God, not by government; that these rights could not be abridged or taken away by any government, certainly not by some cowardly, faint-hearted state official who displays all the signs of an uneducated moron.

Copyright©2008 TruthSavvyOnline. All Rights Reserved.