How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items:

Guidelines for University Faculty


Steven J. Burton Richard R. Sudweeks Paul F. Merrill

Bud Wood


Copyright © 1991


Brigham Young University Testing Services and

The Department of Instructional Science



Permission to copy this document is granted as long as proper acknowledgment is made.

Permission to copy this document is granted as long as proper acknowledgment is made.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 1

Booklet Objectives 1

Anatomy of a Multiple-Choice Item 3

Advantages and Limitations of Multiple-Choice Items 4

Advantages 4

Limitations 5

Deciding When Multiple-Choice Items Should Be Used 7

Measuring Higher-Level Objectives with Multiple-Choice Items 8

Comprehension 8

Application 9

Analysis 9

Varieties of Multiple-Choice Items 10

Single Correct Answer 10

Best Answer 10

Negative 10

Multiple Response 12

Combined Response 13

Guidelines for Constructing Multiple-Choice Items 15

Bibliography 32

Checklist for Reviewing Multiple-Choice Items 33

Introduction


Have you ever seen a truly awful multiple-choice test question? One that is so defective that the correct answer is either obvious, debatable, obscure, or missing altogether? One that makes you wonder what the test writer had in mind when he or she constructed it? The following is such a question:


Technicle advances in farm equipment; a. encourage urbanization because fewer people live on farms b. higher food prices c. revolutionizd the industry d never occurs rapidly e. both a and c d. none of the above

Technicle advances in farm equipment; a. encourage urbanization because fewer people live on farms b. higher food prices c. revolutionizd the industry d never occurs rapidly e. both a and c d. none of the above


Most multiple-choice test questions are not as replete with errors as this example, but you have probably seen many of the errors before. In addition to confusing and frustrating students, poorly-written test questions yield scores of dubious value that are inappropriate to use as a basis of evaluating student achievement. Compare the example above with the following one:


Which of the following is the best explanation of why technical advances in farm equipment led to an increase in urbanization?

  1. Fewer people were needed to run the farms.

  2. Fewer people were qualified to operate the equipment.

  3. More people could live in the city and commute to the farm.

  4. More people went to work at the equipment manufacturing plants.

Which of the following is the best explanation of why technical advances in farm equipment led to an increase in urbanization?

  1. Fewer people were needed to run the farms.

  2. Fewer people were qualified to operate the equipment.

  3. More people could live in the city and commute to the farm.

  4. More people went to work at the equipment manufacturing plants.


While this example may still leave room for improvement, it is certainly superior to the first one. Well-written multiple-choice test questions do not confuse students, and yield scores that are more appropriate to use in determining the extent to which students have achieved educational objectives.


Booklet Objectives


Most poorly-written multiple-choice test questions are characterized by at least one of the following three weaknesses:



Poor Example


Your supervisor informs you that three of your fifteen employees have complained to him about your inconsistent methods of supervision. The first thing you should do is a. ask if it is proper for him to allow these employees to go over your head. *b. ask what specific acts have been considered inconsistent. c. explain that you’ve purposely been inconsistent because of the needs of these three employees. d. offer to attend a supervisory training program.

Your supervisor informs you that three of your fifteen employees have complained to him about your inconsistent methods of supervision. The first thing you should do is a. ask if it is proper for him to allow these employees to go over your head. *b. ask what specific acts have been considered inconsistent. c. explain that you’ve purposely been inconsistent because of the needs of these three employees. d. offer to attend a supervisory training program.


Better Example


Your supervisor informs you that three of your fifteen employees have complained to him about your inconsistent methods of supervision. The first thing you should do is:

a. Ask if it is proper for him to allow these employees to go over your head.

*b. Ask what specific acts have been considered inconsistent.

  1. Explain that you’ve purposely been inconsistent because of the needs of these three employees.

  2. Offer to attend a supervisory training program.

Your supervisor informs you that three of your fifteen employees have complained to him about your inconsistent methods of supervision. The first thing you should do is:

a. Ask if it is proper for him to allow these employees to go over your head.

*b. Ask what specific acts have been considered inconsistent.

  1. Explain that you’ve purposely been inconsistent because of the needs of these three employees.

  2. Offer to attend a supervisory training program.


The alternatives are more difficult to locate and compare in the poor example than they are in the better example.


  1. Use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling.


    This guideline should be self-evident. Adherence to it reduces ambiguity in the item and encourages students to take your test more seriously.


  2. Avoid using unnecessarily difficult vocabulary.


    If the vocabulary is somewhat difficult, the item will likely measure reading ability in addition to the achievement of the objective for which the item was written. As a result, poor readers who have achieved the objective may receive scores indicating that they have not.


    Use difficult and technical vocabulary only when essential for measuring the objective.


    Research. Although very little research has been done on this guideline, one study has reported that simplifying the vocabulary makes the items about 10% easier (Cassels & Johnstone, 1984).


  3. Analyze the effectiveness of each item after each administration of the test.


Item analysis is an excellent way to periodically check the effectiveness of your test items. It identifies items that are not functioning well, thus enabling you to revise the items, remove them from your test, or revise your instruction, whichever is appropriate.


For more information on item analysis, refer to a book on educational measurement such as the one by Oosterhof (1990), listed in the bibliography of this booklet.

Bibliography


Albanese, M. A. (1990, April). Type K and other complex multiple choice items: An analysis of research and item properties. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Boston.


Baker, E. L. (1971). The effects of manipulated item writing constraints on the homogeneity of test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 305-309.


Cassels, J. R. T., & Johnstone, A. H. (1984). The effect of language on student performance on multiple-choice tests in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 613-615.


Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.


Frisbie, D. A. (1990, April). The evolution of the multiple true-false item format. Paper presented at the Anual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Boston.


Grounlund, N. E. (1982). Constructing achievement tests (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.


Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1989a). A taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules.

Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), 37-50.


Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (1989b). Validity of a taxonomy of multiple-choice item- writing rules. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(1), 51-78.

Hopkins, C. D., & Antes, R. L. (1979). Classroom testing: construction. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock. Nitko, A. J. (1983). Educational tests and measurement: An introduction. New York: Harcourt

Brace Jovanovich.


Oosterhof, A. C. (1990). Classroom applications of educational measurement. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.


Ory, J. C. (1983). Improving your test questions. Paper identified by the Task Force on Establishing a National Clearinghouse of Materials Developed for Teaching Assistant Training. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285 499)


Osterlind, S. J. (1989). Constructing test items. Boston: Kluwer Academic.


Roid, G. H., & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. New York: Academic Press.


Zimmerman, B. B., Sudweeks, R. R., Shelley, M.F., & Wood, B. (1990). How to Prepare Better Tests: Guidelines for University Faculty. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Testing Services.

How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items 33

image



Checklist for Reviewing Multiple-Choice Items

Checklist for Reviewing Multiple-Choice Items