|
Thoughts of a Free Soul |
|
(March 19, 2008) Vatican City's extended list of sins has brought the same old question on anvil --- Should we support the Church which has imprisoned Galileo in the past ? While answering this question, we must take into account the bipolar system. Basically, the main aim of the Greek Churches (which sentenced Galileo) was to fool & exploit the unprivileged persons. The simple upright persons were kept on the backburner by pushing them towards "self denial". They were asked to work hard without expecting any remuneration so as to become wealthy in the next birth ! The successors of those who had crucified Jesus Christ were pretending to be spreading Jesus's word. While simple persons were exploited, third-rate criminals were getting amnesty just like that. Even today, Vatican City is unnecessarily carrying the mess created by Greek Churches. Many scams & sex related controversies have surrounded Vatican City. To understand that maze, we must know the difference between Vampire & Father and between Lycane & Mother. Once we realise that difference, the analysis becomes quite clear. The present Pope represents Vampire-Lycane system, whereas the remaining Vatican City council represents Father-Mother system. Most of the scams, molestation cases, gays related issues etc. is a nonsense carried out by Vampire-Lycane combo & they want Father-Mother duo to assume responsibility for that. From America's point of view, this declaration pushes Vatican City towards communism i.e., away from capitalism. From Russia's point of view, the same declaration pushes Vatican City towards Leninism i.e., away from communism ! That means contrary to our perception, Russian communism does NOT believe in EQUALITY. The issue of Excessive Wealth possessed by Vatican City is being raised just to hush-up the fact that only a handful of Russian communists are sitting on exorbitant wealth which actually belongs to large number of poor Russians from east Russia. That means, "in 1990, Russia collapsed because of its support to inequality". (March 14, 2008) The Catholic Church has issued an extended list of 'deadly sins'. While no one is likely to oppose the inclusion of "Earth Polluting" as a sin, some other categories of 'sin' such as "Excessive Wealth" may need more clarification. How to define EXCESS ? The basic universal law states that "No one should take more from society than what he/she gives back to the society." This law takes into account the aspects like efficiency, sincerity etc. So, the term "Excess" can be precisely defined with reference to this universal law. Anyone who takes more from the society is essentially part of some organised crime aimed at exploiting unprivileged persons. So, the Church is NOT completely off-the-track when it says, "Holding Excessive Wealth should be considered as sin." While Church's stand on birth-control has remained almost unchanged, its renewed opposition to "Stem Cell Research" in particular and "Genetic Research" in general requires further clarification. Most of the today's genetic research is based on "Gene Theory" which in itself is NOT as scientific as is claimed. Basically, it's a Racist Agenda that facilitates groupism based upon some specific conditions at birth. In effect, it promotes "Pre-programmed Human Hierarchy" that leaves little scope for individual's efforts to excell. In its simplest form, "Gene Theory" assumes that Father of a Boy child is smarter, more efficient & more confident than Father of a Girl child and likewise, Mother of a Girl child is superior to Mother of a Boy child. That is bull-shit. Highly sofisticated advanced laboratories haven't yet found ANY evidence to justify this silly theory. In spite of that, much larger wealth distribution is carried out by using this non-scientific "Gene Theory" as a basis. Roundabout 70% of the "Gene Theory" is plain humbug. Only that genetic-fingerprint part makes some sense. A simple example from nature will clarify this point. Queen honeybee in a honey-comb is Mother of many male honeybees while her hubby is Father of many male honeybees. Now, based upon that silly "Gene Theory", if you say Queen honeybee's hubby is superior to Queen honeybee simply because he is Father of many male bees, it will be ridiculous. Nature does NOT endorse such non-sense. Proponents of silly "Gene Theory" are hopelessly illogical & that itself indicates that But for inefficiency, there's nothing in the f***ing genes of stupid Racists. That means, the Catholic Church cannot be accused of being non-scientific simply because it opposes "Gene Theory" !!! (January 16, 2008) The recent verdict given by Arkansas court shows judiciary's inability to think logically. Court has ruled that "A child born in a test tube & implanted in his mother's womb after his father's death cannot be considered as an heir to his father's property." Here, the court hasn't said that this Embryo-Freezing-Technology is all humbug but simply because Amy Finley conceived 11 months after the death of her husband, she cannot apply for child insurance benefits. This is nothing but the fence-sitting approach taken by Arkansas court. Imagine a Hypothetical case where hubby transfers his sperms to his wife as per standard bed-room procedures but dies immediately after ejaculation. In this case, egg-fertilization (or embryo formation) will take place after husbands death. Now the illogical precedence set by Arkansas court will ensure that the mother in this hypothetical case also cannot apply for child insurance benefits. That's silly. Isn't it ? (February 06, 2006) By looking at the whopping media-space currently devoted to the New Pope, it appears that the Vatican City church is all set to introduce sweeping changes in its constitution. The New Pope is on the "righteous path" right from the starting point itself. As far as birth-control issue is concerned, this New Pope looks quite convinced that opposing birth-control gadgets (like condoms etc.) is invariably going to result into increased population. If pregnancy can be avoided simply by avoiding f***ing for 3 days a month, why should a person require any gadget for birth-control. Similar goes the argument when it comes to tackle the issue of using condom for prevention of AIDS. If rare cases like AIDS transmission via blood transfusion are kept aside, Under which circumstances will a true Catholic be looking forward to protection against AIDS? Has New Pope accepted that catholics would be sleeping with different partners at different times and as such they carry heavy risk of AIDS? If not then why will a true catholic require condom for preventing AIDS. So why should the previous Pope be criticised for his stand on birth-control gadgets? Saying "Use of Condom constitutes a great sin" can be considered as the Religious Extremism. But you certainly cannot call me a non-scientific Religious Extremist, if I say "Simply because some silly plastic bag smells like fruit, why should I tie it around my p**** while f***ing ?" That means somebody's reluctance to using fruit-smelling condom or even non-smelling condom should not be used for branding him as an absolutist or a non-progressive person. The promlem in fact lies with the pseudo-Centerist lobby which - in the name of opposing absolutism - simply wants to mix-up the issues thereby confusing everyone including themselves...! |
| Comments or Suggestions | Truthfulness | Home |