273 Quiet Chinese New Year : Right Wing Ranters :
<-- PREVIOUS PC HOME TRAVEL MALAYSIA INDEX
[email protected]
NEXT -->

Making a Mountain out of a mole hill ..Mohammed cartoons published in Denmark in September is a similar agenda

Irrational Hysteria again The same as the Princess Diana Phenomenon again

It began innocuously enough. Last year the Danish writer Kare Bluitgen had been searching for someone who could illustrate his children's book about the life of the prophet Muhammad

Keep a sense of perspective this issue is so small it's not worth talking about except for the general lessons we can learn ?before you form an opinion wait for all the facts to emerge
?the mob are irrational 
?they will put a lot of time into small things, while ignoring more important  things
?You might kill someone to save lives, but not cos they insult you
?Laws can't protect you from insult cos  anything can be taken as an insult.  Laws can protect you from being physically attacked.
? In some cultures they don't have freedom of speech so they don't understand why it's important )
? Things that should be more important to the mob : trafficking in women and other slaves, injustice, rich people stealing all the money, 

freedom not having control over your own life, living in fear of violence or terrorism, dying planet etc. Etc.
? The media will always pick a story which is cheap and easy to do like filming the mob instead of doing any real research

Where was the mob when the president of Iran said the holocaust didn't happen ? Are they boycotting Iran ?
To gay people their way of life is sacred

To religious people their way of life is sacred

Both should be open to criticism. It's not nice to insult, but Insult is difficult to police so it has to be allowed. (and is in all western countries) Cos some people do bad things then they hide behind religion.

In Indonesia If someone does a cartoon of a gay guy in are they killed ? Are Danes permitted to come and kill ?

Last month the president of Iran said the holocaust didn't happen ? In his country he can say this, in Germany he can't cos it's against the law. People do bad things then they hide behind religion.

The cartoons are not offensive. Cos the cartoonists are not criticizing M, they are criticizing terrorists who do bad things and then hide behind religion.

When you make a rule that something is sacred and cannot be criticised then this is used by bad people. examples 600 years ago Spanish and Portuguese went all over the American Continent raping, stealing enslaving 

natives etc. and if anyone criticized them, they said ..see you are evil you are criticizing THE RELIGION... 
That is why nothing should be above criticism. 

This happened many times in history in many different religions. For example when catholic priests abused children, some people were afraid to 

complain, cos since the priest is an agent of God when  you criticise him he could say .. ..you are the evil one, you are criticizing God...

This is the issue here before they drew any cartoons the cartoonists, were told "if you draw, we will kill you "

This is the thing they are criticizing.

If something is legal and I say if you do this I will kill you, then I am the bad person. In this case the terrorists are the evil people, cos the cartoonists are doing something is completely legal.

If the angry people want the law in Denmark to be changed so that if you draw a cartoon then you should be killed then they have to go through the proper process, they can't kill the cartoonist themselves. If you make fun of people who have a gay lifestyle then you are criticizing their religion aren't you ?

When leaders permit bad people to hide behind their religion, then they shouldn't be surprised if it is damaged in the cross fire.

Key facts
  • began with a children's book about the life of the prophet Muhammad.. cartoonists were afraid to draw it
  • A Danish newpaper thought it was wrong that people couldn't do their legal job cos of death threats
  • So it asked some people to draw a cartoon and published them in September
  • The intention wasn't to insult
  • When you see them they don't seem to be insulting.
  • The reason they were published was to show the laws in Denmark were effectively being changed by death threats from outside.
  • Images of the prophet have been published many many times before in Muslim countries over centuries from Muslim countries to American TV. So it can't be such a big deal.
  • They have been found legal by the Courts in Denmark, as they are not racist, nor slanderous
  • The protests will achieve nothing ..as they have no right to change the law in another country in fact in the UK Tony Blair (a Christian) just tried to bring in strong laws to protect religion (so don't say he didn't try) and the Free Speech people voted against it so he lost
  • What the protesters seem to want is a law against offending people. This could never happen as , cos gays would say criticism of them is offensive, corrupt politicians would say that say criticism of them is offensive ..and on and on and on


background
: artists in Europe were censoring themselves because they feared Muslim reaction (get 

perspective the Religious RWR do their evil work of spreading hate and division again, helped by the media not giving us perspective ) Notice 

that's September, but the media are still stirring it up in February 5 months later. 
..The initial printing of the cartoons in Denmark led to death threats being issued against the artists, demonstrations in Kashmir, and 

condemnation from 11 countries. What did any of this achieve but prove the original point of the newspaper's culture editor, that artists in 

Europe were censoring themselves because they feared Muslim reaction? He commissioned the cartoons after hearing that Danish artists were 

too scared to illustrate a children's book about the prophet... And the background is that someone had the idea to put some cartoons of 

Mohammed in a book. But when he asked cartoonists 
they wouldn't do it cos death threats were made against them. Now in Denmark you can make cartoons about whatever you want : Jesus, 

God the King etc. So when the newspaper heard that freedom of speech laws were being effectively changed by terrorist threats then it 

decided to take a stand (or test) and publish some of the cartoons  so saying to the terrorist guys ..we are governed by our democratic laws, 

not your terrorist threats..
proves the original point ..terrorism works

Essentially some of the cartoons are saying Islam is the religion of terrorists. Instead of saying no it's the religion of peace the reaction of many is "if you call my religion the religion of terrorists then I will bomb you. ", proving the point. (Ironically that is not so different from the reaction of the US RWR to 911, ..you call us imperialists and we will come 

and invade your countries to arrest you !..One cartoon shows all the terrorists turning up in heaven ..the Angel is saying sorry guys we ran 

out of virgins. Another irony is people are criticizing the cartoons without seeing then cos the news papers are afraid to publish them. Another 

shows a man in a turban, the turban is also a bomb. This is the only one that could be construed as insulting . But who  has insulted the 

religion most the terrorists by have dirtied it by using it’s name to justify their killing or someone who draws a cartoon which represents the 

popularist western view of the religion ?

“Muslims seem to forget that just because they are prohibited from representing the prophet in any way, this does not apply to everybody else." Lebanon’s The Daily Star and in Arabic in Egypt’s al-Dostour

It's important that there should be nothing above criticism. (There are many strange cults and religions, scientology, 

voodoo, Sai Baba. Imagine the devil took over the popes mind and he stated to say people who eat pineapples are sick perverts .. Is that 

OK or could we criticise him ? If we are to be free to criticize anyone else then we have to accept criticism ourselves. The point of western 

philosophy is that you should be able to think anything you like. That  way new ideas can come. On the road to new ideas may come ideas 

people don't like, maybe you may abandon the ideas after thought, but you should be free to consider the ideas.

Religions have unchallengeable dogma, they say no we already everything there is no need for new thought.

Why Boycott when other things are more important You can certainly boycott products. 1. You are hurting 

people who didn't commit the offenses (maybe muslims work in those factories, not that muslims should be more important than anyone else.
2. should we boycott Pakistan cos they fail to stop honor killings ? Or Iran cos they fail to stop fatwas being pronounced. After announcing a 

boycott of Danish goods, Libya has announced a boycott of all countries who fail to stop corruption ? hasn’t it ?

before September in August a Muslim guy was arrested (quite rightly) for handed leaflets saying Danish Ministers should be killed.
Why Speak freely In most western cultures Freedom of Speech is seen as an important thing for balanced 

argument and democracy. The line being drawn at incitement to violence. In many muslim countries the culture is not same many things are 

above criticism: religion, kings leaders etc. So fair enough in an Islamic country cos under some rule Mohammed cannot be portrayed at all, 

the cartoons could not be published. But the people in Islamic countries didn't vote for the Danish laws so they should have no say. They are 

however free to boycott Danish goods if they wish. But they should know that if this is an attempt to change Danish laws then it is a form of 

terrorism to try to change democratic laws this way and the laws should never be changed cos of this action.
always blame the other side (It's a common ideology of the right wing ranters of whatever agenda of whatever 

side pro-western or anti-western that whatever happens you always blame the other side, there is no self criticism or attempt to put yourself in 

the other persons shoes. After 911 the US RWR said ..let's go get these evil foreigners instead of what  did we do to provoke this ? ..And  

the Islamic RWR condemn the depiction of Mohammed.. but don't say ..ah this cartoonist is connecting Islam with bombs. This the wrong idea 

as Islam is about peace. Yes a few frustrated and misguided muslims have used bombs, but this is forbidden in most cases by our religion. 

What can we do to convince the west Islam is not the bomb religion ?
No they rant and provoke things like  the trashing of western symbols like the Danish flag. They never talk about 

controlling the self appointed religious experts who pronounce death threats against westerners who have done nothing wrong by the laws of 

their own countries. The RWR always want to have their cake and eat  it the westerners have to abide by our laws, but we do what we 

want. We can hold fake demonstrations outdside a foreign embassy threatening violent overthrow of the state, we can invade the embassy 

torture the workers and keep them hostages. In Malaysia you can easily find T-shirts criticising and insulting the current US president.. So are 

the Anti-west RWR sayings you can't offend us, but we can do what we want  ? If an American suggested we should kill the maker of these 

T shirts he would quite rightly be arrested for inciting violence. 
From the western viewpoint firstly there is a difference between criticizing someone and deberately insulting them. Secondly offending someone 

is not nice, but it's nowhere as bad as killing someone.

Once again the religious RWR fail to make the world a better place, but actually achieve more evil by stirring up hate and division.

give up principles for money But now in Denmark companies are pressurising the newspaper to apologize cos they 

are losing business. Another kick in the teeth for democracy.. When money controls it. 
The newspaper will apologize with words like ..we are sorry that you are offended, by images that we perfectly legally printed... If they do 

apologise I probably won't buy Danish again.
intelligent Islamic article about the cartoons

Another Moderate American Muslim website
original cartoons or here ..they've been gagged again.

It appears the internet is being censored cos the links now appear dead so I'm not going to put up any more links (but there are so many mirror sites you can find the original 12 cartoons and the hundereds of others that have been made over the last 650 years easily)

There are of course also hundreds Anti-Semitic cartoons from contemporary Arab media.

There always have been many pics of the guy "While the debate rages, an important point has been overlooked: despite the Islamic prohibition against depicting Mohammed under any circumstances, hundreds of paintings, drawings and other images of Mohammed have been created over the centuries, with nary a word of complaint from the Muslim world. Theres hundreds possibly thousands some innocent some insulting "site censored" check mirror sites a US court building has a Fresco portraying him in a positive light with other people establishing laws"

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... and so is insult. When you actually see the cartoons it's clear they were not done to insult
..... they are done in comment and do connect Islam with terrorists.
Anyone ranting about them is proving the point that some religious people are irrational and should use their time to really improve the world instead.

"if you call my religion the religion of terrorists then I will bomb you. " Islamic RWR

"you call us imperialists and we will come and invade your countries to arrest you !" US RWR reaction to 911,

What they could do is appreciate what they have in common and work on that.
You hate child abuse I hate child abuse let's do something about it. Instead of wasting time ranting about minor differences (human trafficking, disease etc).


From the Sun the most popular UK Newspaper (right wing and reactionary ..so don't take it too seriously. It uses a demo of 100 irrationals, but makes muslims look stupid

They would say "look free speech in the UK means intelligent debate.. to the religious it means 'you can't say anything about us, but we can walk down the street with death threats' (incitement to violance is illegal, but the police are too afraid of muslims to arrest people for it)

This is pissing me off in most cultures you automatically put yourself in the other persons shoes.

But it seems to me 90% of M spokesman, come out very aggresssively ..saying you are out to get me !. Instead of saying "I can see how you, are worried about free speech" they react in a paranoid and aggressive manner

No muslim has been kidnapped by non muslims. Nor have non-muslims mounted terrorist attacks on Muslims. Nor have their flags been burnt or embassies assaulted. Yes we do appreciate that the Israeli government can be called a terrorist government and other countries have made misguided military actions, but the west is not out to get Moslems. No we value them as human beings., we don't want to kill anyone only see justice to murders etc. And millions of Muslims have migrated to live in western countries. (though not much the other way round) But the truth is more Muslims are killed by muslims than non-muslims. The countries have mounted wars against each other and inside against opposition people, political prisoners etc More muslims have been killed by their own governments than by the evil Americans ..add it up yourself.

these spokesmen say it's all the editors fault they went out to insult and wind the Religious Peoples up.
"What a load of crap" ... the cartoons were rather mild ..most Western people can't understand why they are supposed to be offensive.
1.If the editor wanted to offend he could have picked much much more offensive cartoons
2. If he wanted to wind RP up he would have taken them to th middle East. Instead some months after publication some RP Radicals took them on a tour of the Middle East they are the people who caused the most trouble.
3. One good spoke spokesman did say the religious leaders had the power to calm the people, but made the political choice to inflame ..it gets worse "the delegation included other cartoons of Mohammed that were highly offensive, including one where the Prophet has a pig face. But these additional pictures were NOT published by the newspaper, but were completely fabricated by the delegation and inserted in the booklet" ..I don't want to believe this

Could it be this this whole spontaneous outburst thing is a cruel manipulation of innocent Muslims ? Last year and before no outrage about previous cartoons and South Park etc. but this year the Imams did a tour with an inflamed dossier (they must have learnt this one off Tony Blair). The cartoons can't be printed in the Arab press so the people can't judge themselves ..so fear the worst.. The Danish Flags were mysterious close to hand .. 2 people died in Afghanistan ..this is sick ..do something positive !

the from http://www.neandernews.com/?p=54%20...."The very FACT that the Danish imams and whoever else went on that trip with the original twelve + three drawings which included this pose from the French hog-calling contest, and tried to pass them off as genuinely representative of the feeling of the Danes toward Islam; the very fact that these men tried to INCITE hatred in the hearts of others against a whole country is VISCIOUS, MALICIOUS AND DESERVES INTERNATIONAL SANCTION AND CONDEMNATION FROM THE COURT IN THE HAGUE! Iran is behind this and Iran should be made to pay a price for this inflammatory incitement to international bad will and physical violence resulting in deaths! "...

Actually I'm baffled, I believe the spokesmen are afraid to say "well it doesn't offend me much", they are making themselves look stupid and lacking in perspective, They didn't scream when other religions were attacked and ridiculed in the Arabic press , they didn't scream when 100's of cartoons were published before, they didn't scream that a terrorist was insultig Islam when he chops off an innoccent guys head on Al Jazseahra.

The cartoons can't be considered insulting cos unfortunately the K itself has phrases much more insulting than the cartoons. (strongly racist calling "people pigs, donkeys, don't be friends with them, kill them etc ", I don't want to say more) And the K is above critism

If you want to mug a relious person , could you leave the gun at home and just take a piece of paper and a pen ?

The west desperately tries to show fairness and respect to Muslims, and we always will ..even though it seems we get little back. I would like to think there are fair and honest muslims and that they too are afraid to speak costhe radicals have the loudest voices.

It's time for the west to close our mouths (we will cos we don't like to hurt people, it's just we don't like to be illegally forced to) and time for the rational muslims to open their mouths.

When 9/11 or 7/7 or madrid bombings or jordan bombings or bali blasts or israeli-suicide bombings or delhi/mumbai balsts or yemen or kenya or nigeria blasts took place, they said: " these are a very tiny minority. they don't represent all muslims. " So, my question is " Do a single newspaper represents entire country? " Muslims say yes and they riot..

smoker : "Just this morning I have got three messages on my mobile phone telling me to come up and punish the Europeans for insulting Islam etc etc etc."

I have the greatest respect for the moderates who spoke rationally and attempted to get the story in perspective. But the credibility of Islam has been greatly damaged in the west by the outrageous overeaction of many people and the failure to speak up of other moderates. Cos it just so unbelievable that people have really been so offended. Especially if they grew up within western culture ..with it's proverbs "sticks and stones may break my bones will never hurt me" as part of the basic philosphy. Surely people undersatnd that, you insult God more by killing someone, than by words.

ALSO Firstly they weren't drawn with an intent to offend. It is legal for Kaffirs to draw M. Thirdly only one cartoon can be considered offensive, and the others have no offensive, connotation. (The fabricated cartoons are stronger and surely making them is a bigger offense)That by condeming the publication, but not death threats which instigated publication religious people are saying that drawing is worse than murder; this is unbelievable ..if there were 10 murders then someone put up 10 cartoon posters in the suburbs in Cairo would you really move all the investigators to concentrate on the cartoons ?.

The moderates have had a chance to make Islam seem rational, but they have failed to speak up.

The Western TV covers Haj. Does the Islamic TV cover the festivals of other cultures ?

Cover the Mosque in flowers

To counter the well coordinated campaign to spread division and convince muslims that the west hates them could we non-muslims make some gestures of peace like covering the street outside the Mosque in flowers Princess Diana funeral style. Would Al Jaz show this ?

Or could we do a "Peace to Islam March"

Solidarity with with the vast majority of muslims who do not practice hate and violence ?

Send in supernanny

I have this child he shouts and rants, and says "everyone hates me", bangs his chest and then sometimes breaks things, burns things ?

Hmmm.. Let me see .. When he's bad do you give him lots of attention ?. TV coverage, CNN BBC, does ne get invited to give his opinion.

See what you are doing, you are only gving attention when he's bad rewarding bad behaviour .

What's the solution ? Mummy should include the child in everyday activity and praise the child for good behaviour.

You have to reward the good behavior not the bad.

Come on TV give some coverage to Muslims doing good. Pakistan making peace with India,

Up to Muslims to Discuss Islam
time to talk than now when all the world (it seems) is anti-Muslims?
see what I mean you your angel self are making a media inspired opinion ...the world is not anti-Muslim..

unfortunately many people are so influenced by media they come to debates/discussions with all kinds of preconceptions and twisted ideas. 'ah you said that, but your'e just been tricky..uou mean the direct opposite." ... Unfortunately the are some malicious people who are manipulating people and the media to cause division, hate and violence between Muslims and non-muslims.

I can't think who would be happy about this except for the "devil". (And maybe people who own beach hotels in Thailand, but Not in Indonesia.) So I don't think non-muslims should debate with muslims about Islam for the time being. There are differences of course, but I believe we have so much in common. We are all people of "God's creation" so westerners wouldn't want to hurt Muslims feelings and if there was a natural disaster here like a Tsunami or earthquake the westerners would come to help.

Wheras the manipulators want people to believe there is an "us" and a "them". that westerners "hate: muslims" and that all muslims spend their days making bombs.

Neither of these is true, when people experience each others culture they find a lot of their negative assumptions about other cultures are proved wrong and that 90% of peoples everyday life is the same. Everyone worries, about the health of their grandmother, the children watching too much TV, preparation for floods etc . Fundamentally I believe that the majority of people of whatever faith just want to be good and do the right thing. Just that some have decided to take the mountain road and others the valley road.

I have no wish help "the devil" by fanning the flames the manipulators have ignited. I will not play their game.

So I think it's best to keep off sensitive topics and share experiences to bring back about better mutual understanding; so that we can together make the world a better place, with less danger, corruption and expoitation. Let's go and pick the plastic bags from the park or stop pollution together.

(P.S. An american comedian warns of the politicians habit of focusing on outside .."why are we always going about Russians and communists, it isn't Russians who steal my car, follow my wife on a dark night, it's American's I need protection from other Americans?

There are good teachers that inspire the children with truth and respect in every culture

I care about all people and don't like to see them hurt so I don't think it good to discuss peoples religions with them .. best to leave them be and ..talk about the weather or things we have in common

Yesterday I posted a message that entitled shut your mouth and save lives

the whole point being by talking people get angry ..and then people get hurt: policemen or demostrator each life is important ..only the devil is happy when people are hurt.

Afterwards new facts begun to emerge..it gets worse ..it seems that some months after publication some RP Radicals took them on a tour of the Middle East "the delegation included other cartoons of Mohammed that were highly offensive, including one where the Prophet has a pig face. But these additional pictures were NOT published by the newspaper, but were completely fabricated by the delegation and inserted in the booklet" http://counterterror.typepad.com/the_counterterrorism_blog/2006/02/fabricated_cart.html

Could it be this this whole spontaneous outburst thing is a cruel manipulation of innocent Muslims ? That this whole process has been planned to make M'ms angry and sow seeds of division ? Last year and before no outrage about previous cartoons and South Park etc. but this year the Some Danish Mslems did a tour with an inflamed dossier (they must have learnt this one off Tony Blair). The cartoons can't be printed in the Arab press so the people can't judge themselves ..so fear the worst.. The Danish Flags were mysteriously close to hand .. 2 people died in Afghanistan ..this is sick

Surely onlt the devil is happy to see violence division among God's peoples ..do something positive ! things are not always what they seem on the surface (though things could get deeper still) check this a manufactured crisis http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-2_7_06_TL.html

the latest about fabricated cartoons ..one of which was just a photo of some innocent the French man

as the story unfolds it seems it's actaully a very clever plan ..see this write up GREAT ARTICLE .. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-2_7_06_TL.html

Islamic Society of Denmark Used Fake Cartoons to Create Story! http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/02/islamic-society-of-denmark-used-fake.html

In reply to email saying the Western Press Always blaspheme There is no West - we are all people of the world just cos people live in one country it does not mean they all have the same point of view.

Don't give me this YOU are the West - WE are the good religious people opinion that's simplified rainwashing Cos there are good people in the west ..there are some bad people in the Islamic countries (thieves corrupt etc)

All right wing people of whatever culture like to make simple ideas of the world.

Right wing people of whatever culture in the world are the same even if they have a different agenda

Unfortunately there are a few right wingers in the west who want to say there is a "US" a logical rational, sympathetic West , and a THEM who are all paranoid violent bomb makers

The secret agenda (of the dark forces) is divide the world apart, to stop moderate muslims cooperating with western Ideas and governments.

To do this they have come up with the plan to brainwash people to believe there is an "us" (Muslims) and "them" foreigners (or westerners)

Of course the world is not like that. all societies are diverse have liberals, people only interested in nature etc. And that is the point I have tried to make before .. nature people in England like to be with the nature ..just like nature people in Malaysii like to be with the nature

To top it all these right wing people are so arrogant not to realise that there in fact almost 7 billion people in the world 1.2 Billion Muslims included, there are Asians with Bhuddism, Shinto, Hinduism, Jain, Africans with countless religions, developing countries.

You can't magically divide the world in 2. See how stupid and simple these right wing people are.

Right wing people in Western countries like to rant and blame the foreigners .. Right wing people in Islamic countries like to rant and blame foreigners

They want to say that all Muslims are a "us" and that moderates they should come back into "Muslim" the fold (where the right wing religious people can control them). Where it's OK to

kill foreigners cos they are a "THEM" not an "US"

They hope to achieve division so that they can more easily achieve their strange and violent missions.. They don't want any moderate Muslim saying "hey guys, it's not a good idea to plant a bomb there. Those people are just normal people like us .. "

I guess they think by killing people there is going to be some kind of victory. When all you actually achieve is a lot more bodies. Won't the Devil be happy ?

please play the game of peace and truth and peace not the game of divide and hate

The above is important please tell people

the blasphemy argument

"For years, they have been blaspheming against Christianity - only that the Christians are too nice to do anything violent about it and merely write letters of protest to editors."

What an outrageous LIE Firstly notice the simplified baby thinking using words like "THEY". The press in a free country has a diverse variety of opinions. Would they inlude the Church Newspapers in the "They".

Secondly almost all of the Western countries do have Blasphemy laws. Some Danish people took the case of the cartoons to the blasphemy courts, but they LOST.. Why cos in the judges prosecutors opinion they don't actually insult GOD, they are a comment about people who use bombs and then hide behind God. It does appear that the most common opinion in the west does differ from the Islamic world. The popular belief in other countries is that if you kill one of his creations .. that is when you really insult God.(You are allowed to kill someone to save a life.) Thirdly your friend will be able to show examples of the press making fun of Jesus. This is accepted. Why because the Christians believe their God and religion is a strong (like a tough tough man). That he like a tough tough politician has strong character and arguments so these "words" just bounce off him like tiny pebbles boncing off a mighty rock they do no damage.

"the Christians are too nice to do anything violent about it ", well if your friend understood the writings of the Prophet Jesus you can see that he was against violence ..."Let he who without sin, cast the first rock", "turn the other cheek" (essentially if someone hurts you then don't hurts them back, when something does a wrong thing to you don't make another wrong to thing to them, instead be strong like man facing a naive child). Notice that there are no Christian Terror groups, no Christian bombs, no Christians burning flags, Christians never destroy what God created. The devil is the one who likes destruction.

"People should realise that the Western press is very anti-God - whether Islamic or Christian" there is freedom of speech in the West so people are exposed to many different opinions unlike in countries where the government selects what people can hear. So you can't make generalised statements like your friend did. Notice how some newspapers in Europe have published some haven't.

-Some say you have to speak freely about everything otherwise corrupt politicians would try to hide behind God as well
- Others say how can you talk about the cartoons if you haven't seen them.
-Others say we don't want to hurt Muslims, Muslims are special and sensitive if they are hurt by words or pictures then it's best not to publish.
- Others say European countries are too kind to Muslims :that they have an easier life in Europe where they are allowed to do everything freely, say what they want (wheras in Islamic countries they would be more controlled). That they receive help for this help for that, money from the government translation of Government documents into their languages etc ,), but that SOME show no gratitude, but help terrorists attack the same European states that have protecteted their families.

(of course each country in Europe has it's own Islamic press also)

Don't Muslims think the inncocent mother and father of a man or woman aren't offended when they see the terrorists chop of their children's heads on Al Jazhera TV ?

By falling for this hate doctrine it is the innocent who insult God and his creation. Western children were created by God if you hate them you hate the product of God.

Think for yourself and make your own decisions.
So easy for people to throw toss lies and simplistic generalisations into the argument. So easy to tip over a plate of rice, but difficult to put it back on the plate.

They make a nasty statement it takes me 3 pages of logical argument to explain why it's not true . It's so easy to throw stones into the water, but it takes time for the calm to return

Notes

By making a fuss they showed to be people and caused it to get published More widely Bhudda, statues destruction .. Blasphemy ?

How can we counter the message of hate, divide, lies, aggression and violence of the Islamofascist ? The devils work God of good values Is their God a god of peace, truth, fairness, reason , respect understanding and construction , Or is he one of hate, division lies and destruction ?

From message of peace, understanding respect for God's creation. TV covers Haj Given up on moderate Muslims -Name child m - Everyone hates me letter Given up on moderate Muslims

-Name child m - Everyone hates me letter to agony Aunt

seems to be true Al Fager (as pronounced in Egyptian Arabic) that published the Danish Cartoons five month ago on Oct 17

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/

Why are there so many muslims in Denmark ? Aren't they largely there cos they are refugees fleeing nations oppressed them.. cos no freedom of speech etc

“A man saw a dog eating mud from (the severity of) thirst. So, that man took a shoe (and filled it) with water and kept on pouring the water for the dog till it quenched its thirst. So Allah approved of his deed and made him enter Paradise.”[16]

Similarly, he (SAWS) said, - “A woman was tortured and was put in Hell because of a cat which she had kept locked till it died of hunger.”

from http://www.khader.dk/flx/in_english/commentary_i_feel_insulted/ Therefore, as a Muslim and a democrat, I want to stress that: I (and many others) do not feel offended by the drawings. But I do feel deeply insulted that where there was earlier a tradition for religious satire in the Middle East it now seems that a satirical stance on religion has become the privilege of the West. And I am offended that freedom of speech, the press, and artistic expression is predominantly the preserve of the Western world. Why are we not fighting here in Denmark for the right of Muslim artists to enjoy the same privileges as their Western colleagues?

I find it insulting that we in Denmark hear demands for an apology to Saudi Arabia’s fundamentalists instead of demands for democratic freedoms for everyone, Muslims included.
<-- PREVIOUS PC HOME TRAVEL MALAYSIA INDEX
[email protected]
NEXT -->

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1