 |
|
| Shaikh Mahmood Shaakir said: |
| So their question wasn't
the 'Eebadeeyah's question to Abee Majliz about the Tafseer
of this Ayaah – about that which the Mub'tadah of our
time agree with concerning the judgement in money andblood with
a law that opposes the Sharee'ah of the people of Islaam and
not concerning implicating a law upon the people of Islaam and
forcing them to take the judgement to other than the rule of
Allaah in His Book and upon the tongue of His Prophet. So this
action is turning away from the Hukm of Allaah and from His
Deen and putting the laws of the Kuffar above the law of Allaah,
subhaanahuu wa-ta'ala and this is Kufr. No one from the people
of the Qiblah with their difference, doubts the Kufr of the
one who says or calls to this." –
From his commentary of At-Tabaree (" Tafseer At-Tabaree"
Vol. 10/ 348) |
|
|
|
|
