Truth, Reception and
Reconciliation-
Nothing to loss,
everything to gain
by Snake
Setting out straight once
and for all the truth, that
it may set them free. As
if the truth will liberate
one’s ignorance and conscience that eventually teach the mind that what
has been done can no longer be undone. The harm has been done that
acceptance and understanding exact in the human a godlike compassion for
which Barabas (that whatever
name he is famous of) the thief had
never pass the chance to delve into his soul. Jesus said these words to
the thief on the cross "Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be
with Me in Paradise (Luke 23:43)".
Asking and forgiving
is a dichotomy that comes after the truth has been uncovered.
Unless the truth comes to shore, it cannot be fished out in the troubled
water. For only then that it serves its true meaning to whom it finds its
course.
The creation of the Commission for Truth, Reception
and Reconciliation in East Timor is a positive move which cannot be used
primarily to exact responsibility from last year’s violence here.
The idea has been awaiting formal approval and it hopefully will
buckle up to work as soon as it can.
It may also seem not envisioned to thresh out retribution on actions committed
even beyond any pecuniary estimate. For this reason, it would seem
advantageous because it will
do away any idea of long, tedious and circuitous legalities that is surely an
unwelcome sight especially a judicial system at its infancy.
It is thus aptly called the Commission for Truth,
Reception and Reconciliation. As it suggests,
I can only guess its import and signification to be bereft of any
double understanding of its true nature and intention. It sets out a reasonably
acceptable formula between any adversarial contentions, it may be
evidentiary but yet would be hardly proved without delay or perpetual cleavage.
I can understand that the Commission might just be
another administrative commission without being clothes with
quasi-judicial function. As such, it can only function
as an open confessional box while receiving the truth with avid
reception, by what it decides under any discretionary power may recommend
to whoever would be the Chief Executive for any pardon.
If and when it is clothes with the
quasi-judicial function, it should be acting both as an
investigative independent commission and concomitantly as a commission
which can mete out appropriate punishment commensurate with any acts or
omissions considered to be violative to any established human law. Be that
as it may, it can actually receive the truth in the form of complaints or
any voluntary confessions , as it is, it can
provide for any reconciliation,
otherwise retribution.
We can only infer at the moment what is it like to
be. Surely, it may filter out the truth and only
act on those within its jurisdiction to pass upon to the maximum of
light or less serious crimes. Serious crimes would therefore be classified
and decided upon by another governmental
entity which is likely be the judicial courts. Less serious offenses can
be considered in the light of its nature, circumstances and other facts
surrounding it. But for all
intent and purposes, it is very hard to determine any hard and fast rule
to distinguish personal crimes from crimes in pursuit of political
objectives. In other
countries of the world, crimes of political nature have been looked upon
with less disfavor than the former.
It might be that
the Truth, Reception and Reconciliation Commission is shying away from any
connotation attributed to the absolute sense of Justice.
Justice means meting upon the guilty the commensurate punishment as
a retribution of the harm done on his fellowmen.
But Justice also exacts the proper protection on the accused of all
available defenses to preserve his innocence like the due process of law,
speedy trial, to be heard by himself and counsel, equal protection
under the law and many more judicial concepts in the long tradition of any
civilized society.
It would be discouraging for a new nation-state to be
preoccupied fending things that divide them more than courting things that
united them. This is an unlikely situation.
It is in the highest order for national unity to be real through
the channels of accepting and forgiving and thus only then
everybody can become a hero of their country’s future.
For what can a man
reap wallowing itself into
misery by what has been done on him if not to rise from it and continue believing that there is yet another
chance to embrace life and all its misgivings.