December 5, 2003
The Mission Statement Sub-Committee met today at 3:30 in the 3rd-Floor Conference Room.
Tom Cummings, S.J., Thom Digman, and Rich Moran attended.
Here is a summary of our proceedings:
1. Members of the committee agree that the the mission statement, as it stands, continues to reflect the values of the school.
2. At least two of the committee members feel that the statement does not reflect the passionate intensity that distinguishes St. Louis U. High�that it is an accurate but not inspiring document.
3. The committee, therefore, seeks the advice of the Foundation Documents Committee as to whether our subcommittee ought to rewrite the statement if we seek to change not its substance but its tone and force.
4. If the committee seeks such a revision, we are prepared to re-draft the document.
5. We understand that any change in the document will require a validating process similar to the process conducted seven or eight years ago. This process demands that we reach out to all the constituencies of the school.

Rich Moran


Input from faculty before we offered a proposal is at NC03FD Advice from the Community

Mission Statement given to faculty for their opinion 3-10-04
This was presented at a faculty meeting in late April.


MISSION STATEMENT OF
ST. LOUIS U. HIGH SCHOOL



As a school with a historic and continuing commitment to a rigorous program of academic excellence,
WE STRIVE to develop among our talented students a devotion to life-long learning.

As a Catholic school dedicated to developing our gifts for the generous service of others and the greater glory of God,
WE SEEK young men who reflect the economic, geographic, and social diversity of the area, and who are willing to go beyond academic excellence to the vision and values of Jesus Christ. Thus, spiritual formation will accompany the intellectual, aesthetic, social, and physical formation of our students, the heart and focus of the school.

As a Jesuit school that should serve as a sign of Christ�s kingdom of justice, love, and peace,
WE CHALLENGE this group of young men and ourselves to cultivate life-affirming habits and to develop critical minds and compassionate hearts.




Some responses to the Mission Statement from the faculty.



To the Members of the Committee Working on the Mission Statement

I really appreciate your effort, thought, and negotiating skills as you take on the task of evaluating the school�s present mission statement and trying to find a better one.

I like the revised statement very much, but I have one problem with it.

In the middle it is the comment �We seek young men... who are willing to go beyond academic excellence to the vision and values of Jesus Christ.� I certainly agree that we seek young men for SLUH who are willing to seek the vision and values of Jesus Christ; that�s central to the purpose of our school.

My difficulty is with the wording �to go beyond academic excellence.� The school has used this wording for quite some time to state the relationship between academics and the vision and values of Jesus Christ--and I don�t believe this wording has served us well. It clearly emphasizes the separation between academic excellence and the vision and values of Christ and implies that the two exclude each other, or at least have little in common. The Catholic tradition, as well as the Jesuit tradition, certainly is much more encompassing and inclusive than the limited perspective that the wording of our mission statement gives.

Moreover the statement can easily be read as presuming that academic excellence is some kind of quantity that can be achieved quickly--in fact, should be achieved as quickly as possible--so the school can move on with what is more important. Yet we know that excellence is a quality that cannot be taken for granted, presumed, or quantified. Academic excellence is an ongoing process with an edge to it. As I see it, it demands honesty, meaningful effort, a questioning mind, and a desire for truth. I could add a number of other qualities (optimism and humility, for example) but the qualities I have mentioned seem crucial. They are also good and noble, certainly qualities to be valued and desired.

I propose that �to go beyond academic excellence� be changed in order to avoid the narrow, limiting, and not particularly inspiring implications of the present wording. I offer several alternatives (though the first is the one that inspires me):

�We seek young men...who find strength, purpose, and dignity both in the pursuit of academic excellence and in the life-affirming vision and values of Jesus Christ.�

or �We seek young men...who are willing to integrate academic excellence with the vision and values of Jesus Christ.�

or �We seek young men...who strive for academic excellence and a life shaped by the visions and values of Jesus Christ.�

Thank you, Jim Raterman



I am very bothered by the attempt to write a new mission statement for SLUH.

It doesn't read well--there's no opening or closing statement to tie everything together, and the sentence structure could use some work. It seems to place academics above all else--"willing to go beyond academice excellence..."--what happened to developing the "whole" person and being a "man for others"? Are we going to discount the young men who not exceptional at general academic studies?

What was wrong with the old statement? It is a beautiful statement about SLUH and a major factor (along with the school seal in the theatre lobby--"Faith and Fine Arts") that drew me to SLUH as a parent and as a teacher. For me SLUH is about so much more than classroom work. This is a place where young men are challenged to begin a life journey of discovery in spirituality and social awareness. Of course academic work is important--this is a school--but football is important, and computer programming, and chorus class...

Right now I am very excited because my younger son is getting ready to take part in what I believe to be the crowning glory of SLUH--Kairos! sorry...I digress

I believe that the old statement is well written and should be left as is. I refer to it whenever I feel the young men in my class are being disrespectful. I'm not sure how I will use the new statement as I have trouble accepting it myself. This is a great school, built on great traditions. We should be working on needed changes and not trying to change things that are already perfect.

Thanks for letting me "speak"

Respectfully, Janet



Hi Everyone.
Just a note to say I thought you all did a good job on the Mission Statement. I do have two comments/questions below.

As one who was the chair of the committee that write the last three and was steering committee chair for a North Central and currently on a committee writing a mission statement for my parish (which is in the midst of far-reaching changes), I know what a daunting task this work is.

I was happy to see the term "ourselves" remain in this proposed version.

I like some of the terms that have been chosen to identify our mission.

Two questions I have are

1) Why do we have to use the term "rigorous program?" This strikes me as being a little too arrogant. And I don't believe the term "rigorous" is not necessarily a positive term.

2) Shouldn't the mission statement begin with a clear statement of who we are as a Jesuit, Catholic school? The statement regarding our academic program should not be the beginning . Does that define who we are? I think it is part of our mission.

Again, thank you for your work.

Art Zinselmeyer



Matt:
Pardon the big print. I am beginning to have eye problems.
I read the mission statement. I don't like it!!!!!!

1. It does not have a lead sentence to tie it all together. St. Louis U. High is a ........

2. Then go into the three areas. if you feel that you need three areas .

3. By putting the academic paragraph first are we saying that that is the most important. I know some people that send their sons here because of the "man for others" philosophy. They could get a strong and challenging academic program many many places.

The statement about "our talented students" seems to be assuming that all the students are the same. What happens if we get a student not as talented as others in a particular area. Do we just assume he should not be here and let him fall by the side of the road? Or do we do what "education" means - find the student and lead him from that point? What happened to motivation?

4. The last paragraph may say that only Jesuit schools do this. I think that any Catholic school should do this and in fact any school should do this. Let's not thumb our nose at the others and say we are better. We have enough problems with that already.

5. I would also like to see something mentioned about the training of the aesthetic talents and needs of our students.

Just why did the committee want to change the old statement. The old one seemed to be more dynamic. This one seems to be very practical and technical. It is just a melt down of the old one. And it has nothing to tie it all together.

Thanks for reading this.

Joe Schulte



Does the committee think that the mission statement should include that SLUH is a college preparatory high school? It's just a thought with many other mission statements around that does include that as part of a school's identity..

Tom Wilson



Matt, I think it is a good idea to mention that it is college prep. Thanks.
Rosemary Queatham




Rich and Matt,

I like the Mission Statement, but of course I have criticisms which are hopefully constructive.

1. It seems long. Couldn't we write a more succinct statement? Or couldn't those long sentences and all those commas be pared down?

2. What is the fascination with SOME WORDS being in all capital letters? That doesn't help me to focus; it distracts me.

3. Diversity is important, but I fail to see how diversity is related to being a Catholic school.

4. The adjective "talented" in the second line almost makes it sound like we seek to develop a devotion to life-long learning in only our talented students.

5. Has any consideration been given to start with the students? That is, we seek, then we strive, then we challenge.

Just some thoughts. Thanks for reading.

Paul Baudendistel



Some thoughts about the �new� mission statement:

I find this revision to be clearer than the first. Vacuous phrases like �Jesuit learning community whose members strive to grow in their personal competence� have been replaced with much more honest and direct assertions that accurately reflect SLUH�s reputation in the St. Louis community (particularly among the Catholic community) as an excellent Catholic high school where talented young men will be rigorously challenged in a environment of faith to develop their gifts for the betterment of society and the glory of God.

The fact that so many of our students in the recent Prep News survey mentioned the academic reputation of SLUH as their primary reason for coming to SLUH certainly supports this claim. (I believe the numbers were pretty convincing). More simply, SLUH�s reputation for academic excellence in a Catholic setting is by far the most important factor in our ability to continue to attract talented young men and dedicated families in an increasingly competitive Catholic High School market. (This is not to say there aren�t other convincing and special reasons why students are drawn to SLUH, but the academic program we offer is certainly the one most frequently given by past, present, and prospective students.)

That�s why I like the opening sentence so much because it acknowledges our historical reputation but also makes the firm commitment to do the things necessary as a school to justify that reputation rather than take it for granted or bury it under meaningless phrases.

I don�t find the opening statement to be in any way elitist. If anything it says we�re about hard work and helping to attract minds (be they students, teachers, or administrators) that are not merely dedicated to academic achievement, but primarily open to the high adventure of life-long learning. Indeed, to use the phrase �academic excellence� without a reference to hard work (which the first statement does) seems to me to be more elitist, because it seems to stress achievement over the real integrity of the process. Furthermore, tell me anything that people of integrity �devote� themselves to that they�re not willing to work for �rigorously�?

It is certainly not �elitist� to say that we are a school that�s serious about being a school. If anything, it�s a most humble acknowledgment of the serious responsibilities we embrace in our mission before God.

I also love that the first sentence is not the only sentence. The introduction seems to announce the theme, but the final two sentences build in crescendo-like fashion to the most moving and mysterious aspects of Jesuit, Catholic education: that being that all of our vision and values find their source and summit in the vision and values of Jesus Christ.

One might quibble with the phrase �social diversity� because it�s not really accurate. (We�re not out actively recruiting the Muslim or Jewish or even Catholic female crowds after all). But I can concede the reason for keeping the phrase also, although it does offer some complications.

The last sentence is particularly strong because it makes clear our ultimate goal of developing �life-affirming habits� as well as �critical minds and compassionate hearts.� That we challenge not only our students but ourselves as faculty, staff, and administration to such a noble purpose of developing virtue and charity is a fitting end.

Thanks to all who�ve had a hand in the revision. It�s wording is much more honest, precise, and worthy of a mission for such a fine place.


Sincerely, Tim Curdt



I have heard some people raise objections to words like "rigor" or "excellence" when they are paired with the word "academic." I wonder, if we were a Catholic hospital writing our mission statement, would we shy away from claiming to pursue excellence in medical treatment for fear that to do so might conflict with our apostolic work?

Terry Quinn




from Rich Moran on why the word the rigorous should be in our Mision statement.

Colleagues,

I wanted to reply to reservations about the word "rigorous" by suggesting that rigor is a central principle in the long history of Jesuit education. Below you will find some testimony to that effect, just a few quotations from the hundreds of Googled websites that connect Jesuit education to rigorous academic work. Quoted below are but a few. Except for the first two, most are taken from Jesuit high school mission statements. If you want more evidence, Google for "mission statement," "rigorous," and "Jesuit." I wonder if resistance to the term "rigorous" arises not out of a Jesuit context but out of the prevailing American context, which inclines us toward ease and comfort. In any case, I doubt that the term would appear so often in Jesuit high school and university mission statements if it were considered abrasive.

Rich

From the St. Louis University Site
Primary Purpose of Jesuit Education
The Ratio Studiorum, published in 1599, reflected the consensus of Jesuit pedagogues after� fourteen years of collaboration. Far from a finished product, the framers of this document urged ongoing assessment to improve the program of study. Yet the primary purpose of this curriculum was clear and unambiguous: To instill knowledge and love of the creator and redeemer of humanity. They sought to realize this goal through a rigorous intellectual formation designed to transform attitudes and moral choices.

From the Office of the President of Holy Cross University
Translated into educational terms, this means that in everything we do, nothing less than the best will suffice. Jesuit education is rigorous; it is demanding.

St. Joseph University
Our understanding of the centuries old Jesuit educational vision of "concern for the individual student" (cura personalis) establishes effective and rigorous teaching and learning as a primary value.

Loyola High School, (Chicago) "as the nation�s largest Jesuit college preparatory high school � is renowned for its rigorous academic curriculum."

Cheverus High School ACADEMIC Mission
Through the structure of its college preparatory program, Cheverus High School strives to develop the potential of each student, preparing the young person for further education. The faculty structures each course according to disciplined, rigorous standards, requiring serious effort from the students. To challenge gifted students, Cheverus maintains both advanced placement and honors sections in most academic disciplines. For the student of demonstrated need, the school provides study skill development through courses in fundamental college preparatory skills. Cheverus encourages achievement by all its students through a variety of incentives and honors.

Jesuit High Tampa
Curriculum
Jesuit's rigorous college preparatory curriculum is designed to prepare our students for admission to higher education and continuing intellectual, moral, and spiritual development. In the departments of theology, English, foreign language, mathematics, science, social studies, and fine arts, students progress through our various requirements.

Marquette High, Milwaukee
As a college preparatory school, MUHS prepares its graduates to attain mastery in those academic disciplines required for admission and success at colleges and universities throughout the United States. This curriculum demands rigorous preparation in the liberal arts.

Boston College
A good place to begin is Boston College's mission statement, approved by the Board of Trustees in 1996. In 350 words it links religious faith, intellectual inquiry, and the pursuit of a just society. It commits Boston College to fostering the rigorous intellectual development of its students as well as their religious, ethical and personal formation; to producing research that advances understanding and addresses societal needs; and to advancing the dialogue between religious belief and other formative elements of culture.

� Bellarmine High School
Mission Statement
The Jesuit educational tradition fosters rigorous scholarship, cares for the individual person, constantly adapts to new opportunities and challenges, translates values into action, and in all, centers learning on the person and message of Jesus Christ.
  1. Bellarmine is a Catholic school in the Jesuit tradition. Its Mission is to teach students of all faiths as Jesus did, by proclaiming His message within a community with the purpose of translating those values into action.
  2. To this end, Bellarmine provides rigorous programs of excellence that develop and harmonize the intellectual, the spiritual, the emotional and the physical.


Sacred Heart Nativity School
Our Mission
To address the needs of these adolescents, a non-profit religious benefit corporation has been formed to do the following:

�������� Conduct a program that seeks the full spiritual, moral, intellectual, emotional, social and physical development of its students, staff and supporters in line with the Jesuit emblem of Men for Others.
�������� Follow a rigorous academic program that will enable its graduates to succeed in college-preparatory high schools.

From Rockhurst University
First Principles of Catholic Higher Education
As an institution of higher education, each of these Catholic colleges and universities is an academic community which, in a rigorous and critical fashion, assists in the protection and advancement of human dignity and of a cultural heritage through teaching, research, and various services offered to the local, national and international communities.



A reply from Brian Chrisopher, S.J.

Colleagues,

This discussion about the word "rigorous" is interesting. Rich, thanks for the work you put into your thoughtful reply. I think I agree with Rich that there is a strong precedent for our use of this word, and I'm not sure that scrapping the word would be the best thing to do. My impression is that, regardless of what word we use to describe the curriculum here at SLUH, "rigorous" best describes the reality.

But I think the objection to the word is important to note. While no one would advocate catering to the easiness of our society so focused on instant gratification, at the same time, what I hear in the objection raised by Mary is concern about the tension between "rigorous" and "cura personalis". I find it interesting that one of the mission statements Rich pasted to his reply actually linked the two terms--balancing the two notions is a fine line to walk! I see the "rigor" of SLUH's environment on the faces of our students for the three weeks prior to any exam set, and it makes me wonder about our ability to "care for the whole person". To call our students "stressed" is an understatement. I have had two students in the last two weeks literally break down in tears after class because of the amount of work they're facing between now and the end of the semester. I would not describe either student as being "over-extended" or "lazy". I have found both students to be quite responsible, and it bothers me that they feel so crushed by the work load. I don't think they're exceptions.

This same discussion came up in the first meeting of our "Grad at grad" sub committee. As teachers, how are we caring for the "whole person" of each of our students? It's good that our students work hard and that we push them to do so, but are our expectations of them unrealistic? Are our students, with as much work as they have, learning to appreciate what they're learning? Are they developing a contemplative side in the midst of their busy lives?

Again, I'm not sure that changing the word "rigorous" will change all this. Indeed there's a long tradition behind the use of this word to describe a Jesuit educational institution. But I think it's good to note the very real concern beneath the objection. How do we address the REAL issue?

If you've read this far... you're a rock star! Thanks.

Brian Christopher, SJ



A reply from Art Zinselmeyer

Matt and Rich,

Thanks to both of you for getting back to me. And Rich I do appreciate the work you put into the discussion of the term "rigorous." And certainly, I would appreciate the opportunity to talk to you about my feelings, my reasoning. However, I don't want to turn this into a debate. The committee has given me the opportunity to express my feelings, give input and I appreciate that.

Would I support the Mission Statement if the term rigorous appears in final version? Of course, but I may not interpret the term in the manner that some would.

After reading both of your e-mails, I still have the same concerns.

To me the term "rigorous" is a negative term. I don't think the term describes what we try to do with our students as stated in the Grad at Grad. To me it has a connotation of learning (life) as a harsh struggle against whatever.

The term was used in conjunction with Jesuit Education and institutions from the beginning, but I don't think that necessarily makes it a "characteristic" of Jesuit Education. There were historical reasons why a term like that might have been used in different historical periods and in different places.

I still question why schools have to tell the public that they have a rigorous curriculum and require rigorous academic work. When I read it; hear it, something does not sound right. We certainly demand much of our students and of each other. But I would prefer not to use the term rigorous to describe those demands. It has the meaning of harshness, inflexibility associated with it. For example in my work as teacher, coach, administrator I have always felt I have demanded a lot of myself and others; challenging others and myself, but I not sure I would ever agree that I have been rigorous in my approach to and with my students and to and with my colleagues, nor would I want that.

And I question the motive for including the word in our mission statement. What is the agenda here? Is there a feeling that we are not demanding enough or that there are groups of faculty that are more rigorous than others and that we all need to be on that same page?

Enough.

Thanks for listening.

Art



Proposal of the Foundation Documents Committee about the Mission Statement




North Central Committee on the Foundational Documents Home Page
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1