Issue regrets the disaster and offers its sympathy and support to all the
affected couples. The circumstances are tragic in the extreme and one can
only imagine the shock; hurt and anger of those eouples that have lost
ernbryos. The blow that a loss of ones' potential children brings is immense
and many couples will undoubtedly suffer from delayed reactions to this.
ISSUE' S counseling service will be at these couples disposal, as and when
.
they need it.
Patients may contact ISSUE on 01922 722888 or the help line on 01256 313171
Issue hopes that the crisis will,be quickly.dealt with and the affected
couples offered support and some form of compensation, which will address
their need and desire to becorne parents.
Tim Hedgley, ISSUE'S Chair and Dr Sammy Lee, ISSUE'S Counseling Coordinator,
Trustee and also a practicing clinical embryologist in London feel that
the
disaster at the two fertility units in North Hampshire highlights a number
of issues.
1. What were the embryologist's qualifications and what where his or hers
background?
An embryologist's credentials must be impeccable; Once the eggs are
collected, the embryologist's look after the eggs, sperm and ernbryos until
the couple retum, to the clinic for the embryo transfer.
This role, to say the least, is a highly responsible one! In circumstances
where an embryologist works single-handedly, as seems to be the ease here,
credentials, responsibility and accountability beeome even more important.
2. How were records. which apparently dated back to 1996, allowed to go
or
seemed to go unchecked, despite annual inspeetions by the govemment
watchdog (HFEA)?
All clinics are regulated by the HFEA. under the auspices of the HFE Act
1990. Clinics are generally inspected every 12-18% months. During these
inspeations, issues relating
to accuracy and security are supposed to be
addressed. Indeed the Code of
Practice requires units to audit their
freezers and contents on
an annual basis:
3.How many other embryologists like this one are there?
It is believed that the embryologist involved in the disaster
was a science
graduate. Ideally embryologists should be trained in, "established"
units by
"experienced" mentors.
.
Training that falls short
of these standards may lead to such Circumstances
being increasingly likely
in the future. Monitoring standards is definitely
now an issue.
4. Does single-handed practice lend itself more easily to such
discrepancies?
If a person is: poorly trained, has low moral standards, incompetent
or
negligent or all of the
above; being supervised does not mean that disasters
like this one could not have happened; but almost certainly,
there would
have been fewer cases and
the timescale of matters would have been greatly
reduced. Single-handed practice
has little to commend it!
5. Who is accountable for this event7
a. The embryologist?
b. The employers?
c. The HFEA?
Without doubt, the embryologist. ,
All embryologists are aware that to err is human. One or two
missing ernbryos
is still a disaster; but
the mitigation is rather more simple, ie. a mistake, the couples still
need support; reassurance and compensation. In these situations, every
embryologist will sigh and think, "'there but for the grace
of God go: I". In such cases accountability and respansibility
still lies with the embryologist, but there is an absence of malice and
of course procedures would be instigated to reduce the chances
of such mistakes
happening again. However,
where forty or so couples are affected, this is
not a mistake. Where the
problem has existed for up to four years, this smacks of
something systematic...
The employers acted in good faith, but the· checks and
details of vetting (in
this case may need to be examined.
The HFEA is responsible for "policing"' clinic. If the embryologist
involved
has committed any negligent or criminal acts, the HFEA must
be partly
accountable for the disaster.
They would have had an opportunity to check
the embryologist's background
and credentials and furthermore the person
would
have undergone at least 3 or four HFEA irispections, where there would
have been
an opportunity to ensure that he or she was keeping up to date
with procedures
and the relevant paperwork. This clearly was not done!
Issue therefore calls for:
a) More serious vetting of individuals employed as embryologists.
b) Single-handed
practice is to be discouraged. Where single-handed practice
exists,
a person in a supervisory role must be appointed and visits by the
supervisor
shauld be made regularly [at least ance a month].
c) In general
(and there are a few exceptions, but not many) laboratory heads
should
be graduates of high standing. Ideally the head will possess an MSc.
or more desirably
a PhD, with of course appropriate background and
expenence (a
PhD in history wauld not suffice).
G
d) The
HFEA rnust re-examine their methods af policing clinics, especially
regardmg
how they audit clinics when they make inspections. Furthermore,
this issue
highlights the need for rnore random checking of patients' eggs,.
embryos
and sperm and how clinics account for them. Quality assusance
·
(mountains of paperwork alone is clearly not enough).
Ends: ·
Dr Sammy Lee can be
contacted on 07710 227645