From: "Tony Bermanseder/Sirebard" <PACIFICAP@hotmail.com>

       RESOLUTION OF NEWTON'S GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT MEASUREMENTS

            The speed of light 'c' has been measured to an accuracy of 8
            decimal places and Planck's Constant 'h' is known with an error not
            exceeding one part per million.
            This is not so for Newton's Gravitational Constant 'Big G'.

            The National Bureau of Standards (NBS) in Gaithersburg, Maryland, US
            began measuring 'G' in the 1930's to establish the Luther-Towler-
            Number LTN=6.67259x10^-11 G-units (m^3/kg.s^2].
            So it stood until 1994, when the renowned PTB in Braunschweig,
            Germany's Standards Laboratory measured G much higher, differing in
            the 3rd decimal place.
            Then New Zealand's Measurements Standard Laboratory published a
            value significantly below the LTN and the University of Wuppertal
            derived a value in between the NZ one and the LTN.

            Notwithstanding the ever improving technological advances and
            measuring techniques; using torsion pendulums, tungsten cylinders
            or suspended or accelerating testmasses; 'Big G' has proven to be
            intractable to conformity.
            One of the latest measurements are 6.67327x10^-11 G-units and
            6.6742(10)x10^-11 G-units and values by no means definitive.

            What is going on?
            Shifting heavy objects in the vicinity of the test apparatus seems
            to influence the atomic structure of the testmasses, irrespective
            of the isolated environment created for the testing conditions.

            The following treatise shall resolve the conundrum and illustrate
            the unruly behaviour of 'G' as a consequence of the initial boundary
            conditions for the universe's subsequent evolvement.
            It shall indicate that even a 'massless' universe would contain a
            diminished G-component as the electric permittivity of a massless
            macroquantised (Hawking) BlackHole and that the present dilemma
            derives from a finestructure of the nucleonic constituents, which,
            by definition, must comprise the testmasses.

            A precise measurement so would rely on an unambiguous calculation
            for two neutronic restmasses, a condition which we shall show to be
            unachievable, because of the nature and interrelationship between
            the parameters of inertial mass and those of electromagnetic charges.

            1. Boundary Conditions for G and a First Approximation
            2. G-Modification through the Hawking Modulus (hm).
            3. A BlackHole-Nucleon connection.
            4. The Precision Measurement of G.

            1.BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR G AND A FIRST APPROXIMATION

            The Mother of all Boundary Conditions must be the statement of:
            "No Boundary conditions apply!"
            So we consider a NullTime and a NullSpace in an undefined, say
            Platonic-Penrosian 'Space' of mathematical abstraction.

            This is like a 'thought' or an 'idea'; how can IT become real or
            even manifest as a physical and quantifiable universe?

            In hindsight one knows how to answer this.
            An idea is born from observations; mental energy is linked to passion
            and the emotions, breeding the inventiveness to engage in a course
            of experimentation and to bring the idea (say a lightbulb, follo-
            wing the observation of a lightning strike) into physical manifes-
            tation.

            But how can one apply foresight, when no observational reference
            frame exists in the NullState of the NAKED SINGULARITY or the GENESIS
            BOSON?
            This then is the 'Boundary Condition' for the NullState, nothing
            exists and everything requires to become invented.
            The Everything is the Nothing and so one can model this state on
            the 'idea' of an infinite selfrepeating computer loop, representing
            the Father of all algorithms.

            This can only be one thing, namely a mathematical representation
            of the Nothing, say in the numeral 0 representing circular clo-
            sure, which linearises in the cipher 1.
            Angular multivalued Complex Infinity is linearised in negative and
            positive polarity of a Doubled-Infinity.

            The hindsight then defines the closed circular NullState continuum
            as a closed looped superstring class I of the Planck-Scale, also
            containing the openended members of that same family.

            But that wasn't the beginning program of primary algorithm, but
            this is a secondary algorithm, which can be stated as:
            "ADD THE END TO THE BEGINNING AND START WITH THE OLD END"!

            This specifies the methodology of RECIRCULARISING the linearised
            dimensions of the binary dyad (0,1) into the root-reductive decimal
            monad (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0) (or some other number system).
            Here then we define: 10=1+0=1*; 11=1+1=2*; 12=1+2=3* and so on until
            26=2+6=8** and 27=2+7=9** give a kind of closure in the doubled (or
            squared) application of the algorithm, reflecting the 'Doubling of
            Infinity'.

            The hindsight then one day discovers, that there exists a mathe-
            matical entity, called the 26-dimensional Bosonic Superstring,
            which folds up the Ricci-Metric in Calabi-Yau manifolds in 6- and
            in Joyce manifolds in 7 circularised dimensions.
            A heterosis of 26-dimensional counterclockwise rotating vibration
            patterns becomes 'married' to such states of frequency, rotating in
            10 dimensions in a clockwise manner.

            A DEFINITION of TIME then became effected, once the first algorith-
            mic definitions had reset themselves in the pattern:
            CIRCULARISED - LINEARISED - RECIRCULARISED - ENERGY=FALSE VACUUM
            - QUANTUM TUNNELLING OF TEMPERATURE WELL = QUANTUM BIG BANG.

            Curling up the 16-dimensional anticlockwise patterns in special
            toroidal geometries, then would allow a definition of Heterotic
            classes of superbranes (HE(8x8) and HO(32)), one of whom would
            become the sought after MINIMUM condition for the Naked Singularity
            to manifest itself in its escape from the infinity-loop.

            The primary algorithm results from the application of 10 elementary
            principles/antiprinciples which defined the algorithm as itself.
            And because this algorithm engages a fivefolded symmetry, there would
            be five classes of 10-dimensional superstrings, upon whom the second
            algorithm could then act.
            The ten principalities are:
            1.Identity/Antiidentity
            2.Expansion/Contraction
            3.Order/Disorder or Entropy or Chaos
            4.Symmetry/Asymmetry or Distortion or Nonparity
            5.Divergence or Infinity/Convergence or Limit
            6.Inversion or Reciprocity/Constancy or Invariance
            7.Reflection/Absorption
            8.Relativity/No Antiprinciple
            9.Quantisation/No Antiprinciple
            10.New Identity/No New AntiIdentity, because of the
            application of the other 9 principalities to effect
            the transformation of One Self into Two Selves,yet
            as the One Unity of One extended Self.

            The purpose for the establishment of the first algorithmic program
            is its cosmogenetic selfreproduction.
            Adding Self/Infinity to Self/Infinity still gives Self/Infinity,
            but somehow, the second Self is different (more), than the first
            Self.
            The first algorithm becomes the mapping of two integral number
            series onto each other, complementing each other in a filling in
            the gaps, created by one of the sequences as a one-to-one corres-
            pondence (like even and odd numbers for example, together forming
            the set of integers).

            But this one-to-one correspondence resulted in the following data:
            (266561); (151618); (141524); (151032); 11; (091016); (061015); 7; 6
            and 4 with a natural limit of 12, set and generated by the princi-
            palities as boundary condition for the selfiterative programming.

            The secondary algorithm then utilised the initiatory number constant
            E and generated the continuation, which would allow the Temperature
            Gradient or Energy-Wall to manifest in the linearisation of the
            physical parameters defined by the permutations of the code from the
            first algorithm.

            The secondary code became (with initialising counter E): BEGIN;
            ABCDEFG(H=ABCD) with E=(266561); F=(136656); G=(673665); STOP GENE-
            RATION because 5+6=11=2* is rootreductive; CONTINUE D=(465612);
            C=(256124); B=(361242); A=(312423); STOP GENERATION because no mo-
            nadic archetype can yield Z(Z+A)BCXY=312423 from its precursor
            ABCXYZ=(1-Z)24233, ending in rootreduction (1-Z)=1-3=-2=-11=-2*;
            END of 2nd algorithm.

            The first algorithm applied the Ordering Principality to DEFINE
            TIMESPACE and the ordering of the constants as given.

            Constant#1=E became the Number of Spacequanta defining the compac-
            tified 16 dimensions of the superbrane scenario upon initialisation
            of the second algorithm.
            All principalities are engaged and the ORDER of the Constant appli-
            cation uniquely sets the physical parameters manifest in the order
            specified;(i.e. Temperature before Radiation before Restmass, etc.)

            Constant#2 defined ENERGY=(Constant#2).TEMPERATURE.

            Constant#3 defined ENERGY in terms of ELECTROMAGNETIC CHARGES and
            in a Universal wavefunction, normalised about the pentagonal sym-
            metry of the first algorithm.
            Hindsight would discover that a local application of this wave-
            function would result in summation of integer states or probabi-
            lities, which upon normalisation and the 'squaring' of the state
            would reproduce the Unity of the original wavefunction in the
            pentagonal symmetry.
            These would be known as the wave equations of quantum mechanics.

            In particular one summation: T(n)=n(n+1) would, upon unitising;
            define the universal wavefunction explicitely in a Feynman-Path-
            Summation and allow the following identity to engage the timespace
            evolution of certain parameters, including the linking of Constant#3
            to Constant#6.
            This would achieve a synthesis known as Gravitational Constant 'G'.

            The all encompassing Identity is: XY=X+Y=-1=i^2=exp(ipi)for the
            generating waveequation: B(n)=[2e/hA].exp(-Alpha.T(n)).
            Here A^2=Constant#3 and the roots X and -Y form the Bounds for the
            NullTime definition in both real-positive and imaginary-negative
            linearised time parameters about the normalised Mean of B(n) for
            n=0 becoming reflective in n=-1/2.

            C-Space is n-real from n=0 and F-Space is n-imaginary from n=-1
            towards the negative integral count.
            In between in the interval [-1,0], is the M-Space further symmetrised
            about the Functional-Riemann-Bound: FRB=-1/2 and as the Point of
            Origin.
            Three orthogonal axes so define 3D-Space, about which a 6D-Twistor-
            Space indicates two further degrees of freedom, each of the arbitrary
            up-down, left-right and in-out linear axes setting the NullTimeSpace
            as defined by B(n) allowing a clockwise or anticlockwise chirality
            in the compactification of the circularised Linespace.

            This extended definition for 3D-LineSpace into 6D-HyperSpace sub-
            sequently transforms into 9D-QuantumSpace in introducing the degree
            of stretching/contacting by the application of Principality #2,
            following the Identity/Antiidentity initiation.
            All principalities are engaged in their defined Order, indicating
            that 9D-QuantumSpace manifests the identity of an expanding and
            ordered and selfcontained continuum within the symmetry principality.
            9D-QuantumSpace then diverges/converges in the setting of certain
            boundary conditions, which must incorporate the principles of
            inversion and of reflection with their antiprinciples.

            Henceforth, 9D-QuantumSpace sets a limiting condition, which
            hindsight would define in all manners of temporal parameters.
            The relativity principle then allows the perception of being located
            at either of two observation points, namely the principalled or
            antiprincipalled vantage point, given in the kaleidoscope of all the
            combined principalities.
            Thus, a 10D-OmniSpace is created, which reflects/absorbs itself
            under engagement of inversion/invariance, becomes relative and
            subject to the 9th principality of the quantisation.
            This defines OmniSpace to quantise itself in 3D-Linespace, following
            the definition of the root-reductive decimal monad, so birthing the
            New Identity as Antiidentity to itself in the completion of the self-
            iterative and selfrelative programming of the first algorithm.
            OmniSpace hence requires to be 12-dimensional in the construction
            of the mastercode, becoming physically implemented in the Universal
            Cosmic Wavefunction B(n).

            The interval [-X,X-1] specifies the maximum for B(n) as a probabi-
            lity interval with B(-1/2)=[2e/hA].exp(Alpha/4) and a standard de-
            viation about the first moment by the multiplier (Alpha/2pi)^1/2.
            Hindsight would discover this as the Schwinger numbers to extend the
            QED-Feynmann diagrams to account for multiple particle interactions
            as permutational possibilities in perturbation dynamics.

            Constant#4 defines ENERGY=(Constant#4)FREQUENCY.

            Constant#5=11 defines the Identity-Relation between Constant#4
            and Constant#6 in Equality by DimensionCounter 11.

            Constant#6 defines ENERGY=RESTMASS(Constant#6) as the Parity-Mirror.
            Hindsight would define: (1) hf = moc^2 [Eq.#1]
            (2) Energy=hf iff mo=0
            (3) Energy=moc^2 iff fo=flimit=fss

            Hence all restmass carrying entities must possess a minimum eigen-
            frequency to exist and this existence relies upon the definition of
            TIME as the Inverse of some frequency: TIMEINSTANTENUITY=1/fps;
            where fps is the MAXIMUM FREQUENCY modular dual to the MINIMUM
            FREQUENCY defined in fss.

            A direct consequence for 'G'derives from this in the Schwarzschild-
            Solution applied to the HE(8x8) Supermembrane.
            Hindsight would discover a best fit for the observed and experi-
            mentally measured physical parameters, as given by that superstring.

            The Coupling Constants between the vibratory (MAXIMUM) part of that
            supermembrane (Eps for Energy of primary source)and the winded or
            (MINIMIM) part (Ess for Energy of secondary sink) are:
            EpsEss=h^2; Eps/Ess=fps^2 with lps.lss=fps.fss=1.

            A direct consequence is the Hawking Black Hole for a minimum
            temperature condition from the inverse proportionality between
            Mass and Temperature for the BlackHole spectra.

            Wavelength lps=WormholePerimeter=rps/(2pi) and rps is modular dual
            to rss in (2pi)lss=2GoM(Hawking)/c^2 in the Schwarzschild solution.
            This is the manifestation of the mathematical modular duality for
            the B(n) definition in: X=1/-Y=1/(1+X).

            We shall use the expression:

            2M(Hawking)=(2pi)lss.c^2/Go [Eq.#2]

            in our resolution of the 'G' dilemma.
            Preempting the discussion somewhat; a massless universe would be
            characterised by an diminished G=Go and the Hawking Black Hole would
            be defined in terms of its Force-Charges.

            Constant#7 defines a transformation from the Radiative EnergyState
            into the Restmassive one given above and the integers 7, 6 and 4 are
            dimension counters, limited by the counter 12 as the holographic
            image for the summed lower dimensionalities, i.e in 4+6=10 & 4+7=11.

            We return to foresight and find ourselves equipped with a new
            possible definition for TIME as:  MINIMUM/MAXIMUM=CYCLETIME (n).

            Algorithm #2 has defined the limiting boundary for a potential
            expansion of 10D into 11D in spacequanta counter E=Constant#1.

            Quantum Geometry, applied to the concept of representing a 4D-Volume
            as a 3D-Surface defines the Riemannian Hypersphere with a toroidal
            volume (2(pi)^2R^3), R taking the linearised form of the MINIMUM
            condition as lps to define a spacequantum in the potential mani-
            festation of monopolic space, hindsight would term 'The Vacuum'.
            This Vortex-PE or VPE is still contained in the NAKED SINGULARITY
            of the GENESIS BOSON, whose eigendefinition in terms of physical
            parameters can now proceed.

            Those quantities are necessarily BELOW the MINIMUM condition,
            manifesting as the last and most physically applicable form of
            the superbrane families in the EpsEss=HE(8x8) heterosis.
            And so a subcontinuum, a dimensional divide becomes established to
            allow the 10D-universe, manifesting as a 3D-Surface, to expand into
            the 11D-universe as a 4D-Volume.

            The 10D-Universe must be hyperbolic, hindsight measurements would
            detect and hindsight would also conclude, that the overall universe
            would be Euclidean flat and of zero curvature.
            Eventually, hindsight would understand, that the closed geometry of
            11D-M-space mirrors the open geometry of 10D-C-space onto itself as
            a mapping into the holographic image of the 12D-F-space.
            So just like one can observe both open and closed curvatures in the
            multiconnectedness of a 2D doughnut/torus; the inner hole curving
            hyperbolically encompassed in a spherical envelope, so is the uni-
            verse multiple-connected within its own unity.

            But the superbrane scenario maps the MINIMUM onto itself and becomes
            the MAXIMUM, the dimensional expansion of C-Space into the M-space in
            the duality perception of being located at the Point of origin as
            the Big Bang Singularity or as the Event Horizon Singularity at the
            wavefront of the selfsame expansion.
            The vibrating Eps becomes the MINIMUM SCALE and the winding Ess the
            MAXIMUM SCALE in that subcontinuum.

            Defining the toroidal volume generator as a consequence of the
            integral H-count: H=[2pi.rmax/lps]^3, then define rmax as a 10D/11D
            boundary.
            Hindsight would calculate: rmax=1.59767545x10^26 metre-units.
            Hindsight would also discover that a dimensional DIM-factor would
            assume the value 7.56 at the time of its discovery; implying that
            so 7.56 10D-universe would 'fit' into the 11D-universe at that time,
            defining a discrepancy of matter in the cosmological calculations.

            We shall find that the baryonic matter is just 2.803% of the
            critical density at the Big Bang; an inertial mass seed, which would
            grow to 3.68% at the time of discovery, adding to a kind of 'shadow'
            or 'dark' matter amounting to 27.8% of the necessary total for
            Euclidean closure.
            This is a function of the deceleration parameter, which as a scale
            ratio defines not only the architectural scale (Gravitationally
            bounding Sarkar Constant centred in the supercluster interval from
            236.1-472.2 Million lightyears), but also the Black Hole spectrum
            bounded by the critical density.

            So Foresight defines TIME=lps/rmax=6.259093473x10^-49 = nps, the
            cycletime at timeinstantenuity, after the second algorithm had
            implemented the cosmic interaction of the dimensionalities, which
            hindsight would term de Broglien hyperinflation, proceeding with a
            phasespeed of rmax.fps and a phase acceleration of rmax.fps^2.

            And here the 'False Vacuum' develops to energise the process.
            TEMPERATURE=ENERGY/k=h.FREQUENCY/k=h/(k.TIME)=h.rmax/(lps.k) and this
            calculates as 7.544809x10^37 Temperature-Units at Genesis Boson Time,
            which is the superbrane epoch.

            RESTMASS becomes: h.rmax/(lps.c^2)=0.011834633 (leading to a defi-
            nition of Avogadro's Constant upon application of Unified Field
            parameters, which span 8pi radians of the 4-folded lps-wavelength
            (of quadrupled 3D-LineSpace as Line-Hyper-Quantum-OmniSpace) and
            integrating as the toroidal spacequantum in its sinusoidal pro-
            pagation in: (pi/4)[S]{sin(3x/2)-cos(3x/4)}^2dx and the VPE-
            sourcesink-quantum in: VPE-Quantum=(4pi.hfps/lps^3)=2.51327..x10^64
            in enery desity in (Energy/Volume)-units.

            Since 12 magnetopolic current 'knots' specifiy this field, the
            vacuum is energised by the magnetopolic energy.
            This energy is given as [c^3] unified F-space units and manifests in
            the lower dimensions as the Current/Linespace quantum [ec] or as
            exactly 27x10^24 eV, which is a monopolemass of [ec=4.82x10^-11] kg-
            units.

            The VPE of the vacuum so becomes defined in wormhole parameters for
            the Naked Singularity putting 'some clothes' on.

            In terms of TEMPERATURE however, the nps cycletime is lower than
            the Genesis Boson Time in 2.93516x10^36 Temperature-units.
            The 'False Vacuum' so induces the tunneling of the higher tempera-
            ture to its lower value.

            This becomes the decisive parametrisation for the mechanism and
            dynamics of the tunneling matter wave inflation.
            The de Broglie phaseacceleration calculates as: 1.437908x10^87
            (m/s^2) units and the Temperature-Field of the universe as a 'Black
            Body' gives the Quintessence or Einstein-Lambda as the Schwarzschild
            expression: GoMo/lps^2=2.015x10^85 (m/s^2) units, with Mo a Mass-
            Seedling from the first algorithm defined as a function of E:

            Mass-Seedling: Mo= [E]^1/2.mc.mp/me=1.813713x10^51 kg-units [Eq.#3]

            mc is the nucleonic prototype; mp is the Planck-Mss and me is the
            effective electronmass.
            mc and me derive from the couplings between the superbrane classes,
            one of which gives the scalerelation between the electromagnetic
            and the gravitational interactions as: (Alpha)G=[AlphaEMR]^18.
            mc derives from that and me is a consequence of the definition,
            linking wormhole perimeter lps to the classical electronic radius
            (and hence the effective electronmass).

            There are exactly 10^10/360 lps wavelengths in one electronic radius
            as a consequence of linearising rps=lps/2pi into lps over a 2pi or
            360 'degree' count.
            The 360-degree count is not arbitrary, because the dimensionless
            unification for the electric permittivity (epsilono=1/(120pi.c) with
            the magnetic permeability (muo=120pi/c) specifies a halfrotation in
            the geometric definition of the number (PI) as a trigonometric expan-
            sion and sets 180 as that limit.

            Now the deceleration parameter, aptly so called in 'reducing' the
            de Broglie Phase acceleration to the instanton of the classical
            and metricased cosmic expansion of the quintessence calculates as:

            qo=GoMo/c^2.rmax=0.01401506=Mo/2Mcritical=Omega/2 [Eq.#4]

            The critical Mass for closure for all definitions produced by the
            first algorithm is given in considering the universe as a 11D-Mother
            Black Hole (F-M-C-Space=Father-Mother-Child-Space).
            Then using the linearised time definition from cycletime n=Ho.t and
            the Nodal Hubble-Definition: Ho=c/rmax, we get the critical Volume
            as 2(pi)^2rmax^3 and the critical density as Ho^2/4(pi)^2Go.
            Using the spherical 3D-volume would give the critical density as
            3Ho^2/8(pi)Go, which differs in the Feigenbaum-Chaos-Delta=(3pi/2)
            as dimensional unifier for the curvatures.

            Mcritical so becomes explicitely defined as the MassTotal for the
            universe and as 6.446x10^52 kg-units.

            If we set the instanton time as tps=fss (modular), then this sets
            the MINIMUM SCALAR HIGGS FIELD POTENTIAL from INFLATION MAXIMUM into
            the superbrane epoch as tinflationlimit=3.946x10^-32 seconds*.
            The instanton relates as fss as 3.333.x10^-31 seconds*.
            TIME as linear expression for the multivalued circular singularity
            spectrum 'BEGINS' at TIMEINSTANTENUITY=tps=fss(modular).

            But 'G' was not defined in the first algorithm, so where did it
            derive from?
            We begin with the Gravitational Finestructure being a scaled version
            of the Electromagnetic Finestructure Alpha, with a generalised for-
            mulation: Dimensionless Constant =(Constant).(Charge^2)/hc,
            ForceCharge taking either the form of Coulombic Charge e or of
            Restmass Charge m.

            We now relate the Forcefields in the identity [ke^2]u=[Gm^2]u,
            subscript u denoting unification; and where 'Coulomb-Charge' e
            becomes defined (say in a Newton-Raphson Iteration) in the
            wavefunction B(n).

            The primordial algorithm specifies A=h/(2e) as the manifestation of
            supermembrane class IIA and that in modular duality to the neigh-
            bouring EpsEss heterotic supermembrane.

            This relates to superconductive states in the Josephson Constant and
            the Quantum Hall Effect, both derivative from the F-Space ACTION-LAW
            of ACTION=CHARGE^2, which was applied before.

            Generally, all mass definitions are defined in terms of the ma-
            gnetic monopole, manifesting as class IIB.
            Hence all mass is rendered magneto-monopolic at this stage of the
            definition process.
            The following expressions for the magnetocharge e* (measured in the
            StarCoulomb C*) are applied in the mapping of magnetopole charge
            [e*] in F-space onto the electropole charge [e] in C-space.

            This transition relates to the superbrane epoch before timeinstan-
            tenuity.
            (a) 2pi.Go.mc^2/hc=Alpha^18 =(60pi.e^2/h)^18 [Eq.#5]

            (b) Eps=hfps=Ess.fps^2=[(2pi.Go.me^2/(4Alpha.hc.e^2)]^1/2=1/e*

            (c) (2e).(Re) = (e*).(lp.Alpha^1/2)

            (d) Olp=[e/c^2]=(lp).Alpha^1/2

            The last expression is the Planck-Length-Oscillation, unifying
            Gravitation with Electromagnetism.
            For unitary consistency in C-space the dimensionless nature of the
            Force-Charges must become linked to the monopolic spectrum and that
            is achieved in the mapping of e* onto e.

            The C-Space relation 2Re.c^2 maps the F-Space relation Olp.c^2
            and the unitary symmetry is the relation between the electric
            permittivity and gravitation in the identity:

            Go = (4pi.Epsilono) = 1/30c (dimensionless) [Eq.#6]

            via unitary unity: [metre/Farad=Jm/C^2]=[kg^2/Nm^2].
            The StarCoulomb C* =[m^3/s^2] =[Volume.Angular Acceleration] and
            crystallises in the diameter of the electronic spacial extent.
            This manifests the energy of F-space in magnetopolic equivalence to
            the electropolic size of an atomic nucleus in 3 dimensions.

            We note the independence of the primordial Energy from the
            restmass.
            Substituting k=1/(4pi.epsilono)=1/Go into the electric constant from
            the Maxwell Constant gives the 1/30c numeracy, independent from
            the [kg] unit.

            The generation of the masterconstants demands the establishment of a
            cosmic-standardised unitary system (*) and the only constant shared
            between both the (*) and the SI-system is the magnetic permeability
            constant.

            This is decisive in determining the lower dimensional 'dip' in the
            Alpha-Constant, which remains invariant in the higher dimensional
            settings, (where Alpha is independent of c and Epsilono).

            But now the Charge-Mass relation, as manifesting in C-space, is
            indicated.
            We set the Constant=Go.mc^2 = G(n)X^n.Mi.Y^(n/2).Mj.Y^(n/2) for any
            cycletime n and a measurement G(n).

            The partitioning of masses does not change the productation, since
            (XY)^n remains unity for all values of cycletime n.
            This is an addition in the form of the baryonic mass seed given in
            Mo/Mcritical however and a First Approximation for G(n) becomes:

            G(n) = Go.X^n [1 + Mo.Y^(n/2)/Mcritical] [Eq.#7]

            For an universe devoid of any mass, we have m=0 and G(n)=Go.X^n,
            the following identity needing to be be satisfied:

            Mo/Mcritical = 2.MHawking/[Mo.(hm)^2] with Mo=hFo/c^2 by [Eq.#1].

            But this is only the case for the Hawking Modulus [hm]=1, a con-
            dition leading to [Eq.#2].

            This would mean however, that no distribution for nucleonic states
            exists, and that the mc-protonucleon only manifests in its restmass
            equivalent or photonic-bosonic (or supersymmetric) state.

            For a calibration: 1.000692265[m^3/kg.s^2]*=[m^3/kg.s^2](SI),
            G(npresent)=6.684953x10^-11 [Nm^2/kg^2], is a first approximation.

            This is the upper bound for G and will, under utility of the Hawking
            Modulus, be substantially reduced.

            2.G-MODIFICATION THROUGH THE HAWKING MODULUS

            We recall the Hawking Modulus (hm) and relabel the Hawking Mass
            under consideration of it specifying a minimum Temperature Con-
            dition under application of the modular duality coupling constants:

            Tmax=Tps=Eps/k; Tmin=Tss=Ess/k;
            lps.lss=fps.fss=1=fps.lps/c=c.fss.lss

            Then (hm)^2 = 2MHawkingMax.Mcritical/Mo^2 [Eq.#8]

            For(hm)=1: 2MHawkingMax=Mo^2/Mcritical=2pi.lss.c^2/Go [Eq.#2]
            and as the Schwarzschild solution for rss=l/rps=2pi/lps=2pi.lss.

            But if (hm) is not equal to 1, we require an alternative method
            to determine MHawkingMax, using its defined relationship to Tmin.

            The superbrane epoch defines the Zero-Point-Vacuum-Oscillator as:
            EPlanck/2 = h.fPlanck/2=mplanck.c^2/2=[hc/(2pi.Go)]1/2.c^2/2 and
            the Planck-Temperature is: TPlanck=[hc^5/(2pi.Gok^2)]^1/2.

            We use a generalised Mass-Temperature Product MBLackHole.TBlackHole
            and initialise it in the value of superbrane class I, which is the
            Planck Boson.

            MBlackHole.TBlackHole=mPlanck.Tplanck/2=hc^3/(4pi.Go.k)

            Then, at the instanton tps=fss, this becomes:
            hc^3/(4pi.Go.k) = mps.Tps = lps.c^2/(4pi.Go).Tmax, with Tmax=hfps/k

            Hence h.lps.fps.c^2/(4pi.Go.k)=hc^3/(4pi.Go.k) as required for the
            maximum Temperature and minimum Mass condition of inverse propor-
            tionality.

            For the minimum Temperature and maximum Mass condition, the mo-
            dulation of the electromagnetic spectrum for the propagation of
            information at lightspeed 'c' must become redefined in the Hawking
            Constant (HC) however.

            Particularly, hc^3/(4pi.Go.k)=(HC).mss.Tss=(HC).2pi.lss.fss.c^2.h/k,
            which is (HC).pi.ch/(Go.k), defining (HC) explicitely for all Black
            Holes in the generalised proportionality.

            HAWKING CONSTANT (HC) = c^2/(4pi^2) (dimensionless)

            This is reflected in the modular duality of Gravitational Radiation
            (GR) being modulated in the inverse lightspeed 1/c to that of
            Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) and as a consequence of the modular
            duality between the two fundamental interactions reciprocating each
            other in the mappings of 12D-magnetocharges onto 3D-electrocharges
            via the medium of the vaccum and the VPE.

            For EMR: l.f = c modular dual to l.f =1/c for GR, the unifier
            being the dimensionless form of Constant#6=(091016), defined as the
            integer square-triplet (9,10,16)=9x10^16 by the first algorithm of
            the cosmogenesis.

            The BlackHole Mass-Temperature Relation for dimensionless c^2 so is:

            Mass(BlackHole).Temperature(BlackHole)=(HC).MHawkingMax.Tmin
            =h.c^3/(4pi.Go.k) [Eq.#9]

            The Hawking Mass so must be:
            2MHawkingMax=(4pi^2.hc/(4pi.Gok)/Tmin=60pi.c^3/lps (dimensionless)
            = 60pi(eV-Monopole-Mass)/(primary source wavelength).

            We note the relationship to the F-Space in Alpha=60pi.e^2/h ,
            which independent from the electric permittivity and constant 'c',
            nevertheless defines the critical masstotal for the universe as
            being of monopolic origin.

            A particular finestructure for Heisenberg's Constant derives the
            numerical value for the wormhole perimeter independent of experiment
            and as a direct consequence of the primary algorithmic definitions
            given so far.
            (a) Planck-Length-Oscillation: OlP=[e/c^2]

            (b) Generalised F-Space Hamiltonian: 2e.Re=e*.lP.Alpha^1/2

            (c) Magnetic F-Space Permeability: muo=120pi/c

            Define unified Action as: [h]u = [momentum p]u.[displacement x]
            [mc.x]u = [ec]u c.[x]u minimised in the OlP as x=e/c^2
            [h]u = [ec^2.e/c^2]u =[e^2]u = [h]u by the ACTION LAW of F-Space.

            But muo = [8pi/360].[Ne*/Re] for a MagnetoCharge counterNe* in the
            definition for the extent for the Unified Field in radian measure
            linearising to a space of fourfolded circular closure.

            Equality for muo with dimensionless [c^2] and the Action Law
            in: muo/epsilono=Unitary Resistance in CHARGE^2=ENERGY^2/CURRENT^2
            leads to:
            N = 2700/c^3 = by definition of (b) above and the
            mapping of magnetocharge e*=2Re.c^2=1/Eps from the Planck-Oscilla-
            tion OlP.c^2=e.

            N can also be written as: N=2700.e/([ec].c^2), to illustrate the
            magnetopolic nature and origin of all mass in the Monopolic Dis-
            placement Current: Iss = 2e.n.fss.
            Here 'n' is an integer quantising electropolic chargequantum e via
            definition of dimensionless epsilono.

            Heisenberg's Finestructure so becomes: h/4pi=lps/(8pi.Re.c^3),
            EXPLICITELY specifying lps=2700/c^3 dimensionless and manifesting
            in the wormholeperimeter of 10^-22 metres*.

            In terms of experiment, the concentration of 0.002 Joules* of energy
            at a cross-sectional area given by the wormhole radius rps, would
            create this wormhole as the macroquantised singularity of the
            supermembrane class I, manifesting at the EpsEss-heterotic scale.

            The critical mass Mcritical=k[ec]; k depicting the proportionality
            between magnetopolic supermembrane class IIB (c^3 eV) and the total
            masscontent for the universe, seeded in Mo.

            The massparametric evolution for the universe is now defined.
            The zero curvature for the (oscillating)11D-supermebrane is given in
            Mcritical.
            The minimum/maximum curvature at the instanton fss=tps evolves the
            universe as a maximum Temperature bosonic singularity, superimposed
            upon the 10D-evolution, given by Einstein quintessence and the
            formulations for the universe as a Black Body Radiator.

            The deceleration parameter qo defines the baryonic massproportion
            between Mo and Mcritical as the cosmic architecture in the Sarkar
            Constant at cosmological redshift z=7.477 or cycletime qo at so
            236.1 Million years.

            This defines a Sarkar-Black Hole with that radius and in the for-
            mulation: RSarkar.X^n = 2GoMSarkar/c^2 as Schwarzschild solution.

            But rmax=2GoMo/c^2=4.47830367x10^24 m* as the SarkarConstant (2qo),
            with MSarkar becoming the Restmass Seedling Mo.

            Hence for RSarkar.X^n=rps, n=ln(rps/RSarkar)/lnX=227.0435388,
            translating to about 3.83476537 Trillion years required for a
            cosmic antientropic recharging to occur.

            This represents a 'Heartbeat' for the Mother-Black Hole in M-Space
            as the 'Heart' of C-Space.
            The entropic difussion of stellar-nuclear fuel is reenergised in the
            continual oscillation of the cyclic expansion/contraction of the
            11D-M-Space as a MASSLESS BLACK HOLE of magnetopolic definition.
            Mcritical is constantly diminished or added to in the evolution of
            the restmass seedling Mo, fluctuating between mps and Mo in the
            oscillation of the Displacement Scale, bounded in the Sarkar
            Constant and the Wormhole Radius.

            The added mass, given in the quintessential parameters and the
            evolution of the G-productation:

            G(n)=Go.mc^2=4pi.Epsilono.X^n.Mi.Y^(n/2).Mj.Y^(n/2) [Eq.#10]

            remains unobservable, because (XY)^n = 1 for all n by definition of
            the primordial algorithm.

            The 11D-M-Space membrane WRAPS around the 4D-C-Space 'Mother-Black
            Hole' of the 'Heart' and shrinks as a STROMINGER-BRANE, the latter
            protecting the tearing of spacetime into discontinuities in the
            Witten-Mirror, remaining as the 11D-boundary for the 10-D universe
            to expand into as the 3-D-Surface, in both, containing and projecting
            a 4-D-Volume.

            The minimum temperature condition further restricts the entropic
            expansion for the superstringed cosmos.

            The Gibbons-Hawking Temperature is given by hc^3/(4pi.Gok)=Mo.TGH,
            specifying TGH=5.03486154x10^-28 Kelvin*.

            The modular Temperature minimum: Tss=hfss/k=1.57412213x10^-41 K*,
            hence becomes redefined in the Black Hole of the Hawking Maximum
            as: MHawkingMax=30pi.c^3/lps=2.54469005x10^49 kg* and for a
            temperature of: Tmin=3.588568212x10^-26 Kelvin*.

            The true Hawking Modulus is: (hm)^2=2MHawking.Mcritical/Mo^2 and
            so:
            (hm)^2 = 1.001085887

            Subsequently, we can now proceed to redefine our first approximation
            for Newton's Constant 'Big G'.
            Simply dividing our first approximation of [Eq.#7] by this modifier,
            would give a second approximation in: G(npresent)=6.67770177x10^-11
            G-units; and then the application of an alternating power-series
            expansion in various convergent perturbation models might finetune
            the value for G(npresent) even further.

            Yet, it was the Hawking Mass, which was found not to render (hm)^2
            equal to 1 and the Hawking Mass is bounded below by Mo and above by
            Mcritical in the setting of Mo^2=(hm)^2.Mcritical.MHawkingmax, and
            a scenario, which can be defined as a massless state in [Eq.#1].

            Having established that the proportionality between the macromasses
            is not exact, irrespective of there being any actual mass at all;
            we search for a similar proportionality between the micromasses.
            And it are such collections of micromasses, which constitute the
            masses used in the measuring equipment to determine G(npresent).

            We recall the Minimum/Maximum mappings in the general application
            of the 6th principality of Inversion/Invariance, underpinning the
            symmetries of modular duality in 3braned F-Space-Theory.

            We have seen, that the concept of dimensional time was unneccessary
            to manifest the threefolded multispace of Line-Hyper-Quantum-Space
            in 9 dimensions.
            This is mirrored in the decimal monad, allowing redefinition of the
            first principality in the tenth as an Identity/Antiidentity transfor-
            mation into a DoubleIdentity.

            The principalities became defined in the first subroutine of the
            generating master algorithm, which could be stated in generalised
            form in the following manner to DEFINE THE (ABSTRACT) CONFIGURATION
            SPACE in the form of AWARENESS-TRIPLETS of the form:
            {OLDSTATE, EXPERIENCE, NEWSTATE} and selfiterative in the following
            algorithmic statement:
            GENERATE NEWSTATE IN ADDING THE SECOND NEWEST OLDSTATE AS EXPERIENCE
            TO THE NEWEST NEWSTATE AS THE NEWEST OLDSTATE.

            ...BEGIN (0,0,0)-DEFINE SELFSTATE=(1,0,1)-REDEFINE BINARY EIGENSTATE
            =(01,01,01)=(0+1,1,1+0)=(1,1,10)=(1,1,2)-(2,1,3)-(3,2,5)-...CONTINUE
            INITIALISE: N=0; LIMIT=[REDEFINITION OF EIGENSTATE]={GOOGOLPLEX E}
            -FOR (N=N+1 TO LIMIT) GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (DEFINE PARAMETERS FOR EIGENSTATE FOR M=M+1) GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (ALGO[M]) GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (...) GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (...) GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (SEARCH FOR LIMIT=[!])-STOP GOTO
            -SUBROUTINE (!- GOTO BEGIN -REDEFINE SELFSTATE IN [!]) GOTO
            -CONTINUE FOR O=M FOR LIMIT=[EIGENCODE IN !]={GOOGOLPLEX E} GOTO
            -REPEAT FOR SUBROUTINE (O- [O]=[!], [!]=[!+1], [?]=[!]) GOTO
            -REPEAT FOR LIMIT GOTO BEGIN...

            3. A BLACK HOLE NUCLEON CONNECTION

            Our discovery of the one-to-one correspondence between magnetic-
            and electric charges now allows us to state the General Principle
            underpinning all of physics.

            ALL MASS IS MAGNETOELECTRIC AND ALL CHARGE IS ELECTROMAGNETIC!

            All ElectroCharged Mass is CurrentEquivalent to a MagnetoCharged
            Displacement in a MagnetoMassCurrent Iss=(n).2e.fss.

            All MagnetoCharged Mass is CurrentEquivalent to an ElectroCharged
            Displacement in an ElectroMassCurrent: dQ/dt=d(n.e)/dt.

            The Electropolic Charge of a particle manifests in the Coulombic
            Electricity and the Magnetopolic Charge of a particle manifests in
            the StarCoulombic Magneticity.

            All mass is quantised in the restmass mss-quantum as fss-magneto-
            current-equivalent: mss=hfss/c^2=2.469135802x10^-81 kg*.

            Hence the entropic counter for a single VPE-quantum is fps^2=9x10^60.

            All massless particles are magnetocharged in the supersymmetric
            colourcharge of the UFoQR (Unified Field of Quantum Relativity).
            The agency for the colourcharging is the quantum geometry of
            colour-charge-displacement, given in the YLEM-TEMPLATE.
            This is the Higgs Bosonic Blueprint of the Dineutron (Ylem), given
            as a trisected Kernel-InnerRing(annular)-OuterRing KKIRKOR pattern
            for the topological mapping of 11D onto 2D.
            One can denote a primary colour/anticolour spectrum in triplets,
            doublets and singlets, following the methodology of QCD and the
            Standard Models of the hindsight.
            Then the Ylem-template is: HB(0)=YYCCMM(0)+RRRRGGGGBBB(0), defining
            mass defined in Matter-YCM-blueprints and in a scalar (0spin)Higgs-
            (Anti)Neutrinoic Kernel of (R^4G^4B^4), and as RedGreenBlue and
            CyanMagentaYellow colour/anticolour denotations respectively.

            The scalar Higgs (Anti)Neutrino defines the relationship between
            colourcharge and magnetocharge in the MesonicInnerRing MassInduction
            and is defined in the mapping of the ylemic template of the micro-
            cosm onto the evolution of the macrocosm and as specified in the
            second cosmogenetic algorithm in the Googolplexes E, F and G.
            The formulation for the Higgs-Neutrinoic-Mass so becomes:

            m{Higgs-Neutrinos}=(lps.me.rE)/(2pi.Re).[1/rG-1/rF] [Eq.#11]
            =9.300746x10^-38 kg* or 0.052106 eV*.

            This gives the InnerMesonicRing as a modular mapping onto the ylemic
            evolution of prototypical Neutron Stars in the annular difference
            between spacequanta counters F and G.
            It also defines this annular region as the mass of the Tau-(Anti)Neu-
            trino, centred on 3.00 eV* and as superpositions of the massless
            Kernel-(Anti)Neutrinoes (Electrons and Muons of RRGGBB and BBGGRR
            quantum- and colourcharged specifications).

            The generation of the ylemic neutronstars sets the dineutronic
            radii as a function of their temperature only and is given in:

            Rylem(T) = (kT.Re^3/Gomc^2)^1/2 m* [Eq.#12]

            The process of the ylemic-mesonic creation spanned the period of
            [843-1036] seconds* after tps and set the decay for the neutron.

            The AntiHiggs-blueprint for Antimatter is supersymmetric to HB(0)
            as: HB'(0)=MMCCYY(0)+BBBBGGGGRRRR(0) and manifests in the VPE-
            transformations (Pair-Production/Annihilation), subject to the
            modular duality between EMR (ElectroMagnetic Radiation) and GR
            (Gravitational Radiation) and as defined in the colourcharge temp-
            lates for the gauge bosonic fieldparticles (Graviton, Eps-Photon,
            Ess-AntiPhoton with Weakons and the Gluon).
            There exists the blueprint YYCCMM(-1), called the RestMassPhoton=RMP,
            which is the supersymmetric substitute for the suppressed Antimatter
            in the UFoQR.
            Directly linked to fermionic spin patterns, the RMP is massless and
            symmetrises the Strong Nuclear Interaction in its link to the other
            gauge field agents.
            The RMP and can be used to quantify the 'Missing Mass' as AWARENESS
            or Consciousness Energy via the definition of the Magnetocharge as a
            kind of angular acceleration acting upon a volumised spacequantum.
            The agency is the Timedifferential for Frequency, defining:
            df/dt = AWARENESS bounded by fps^2 and hence the entropy counter
            of the VPE-Continuum, defined in googolplexes E, F, G and H.

            The evolution of the Gravitational Constant G so relates to the
            scenario of magnetocharged mass appearing or disappearing as a
            function of the overall oscillatory nature of the encompassing
            11-dimensional supermembrane and its 10-dimensional 'heartbeat'.

            One can so discover the consciousness of the created universe as
            an inherent quality of physically defined Awareness parameters and
            their manifestation in locally-connected symmetric and nonlocally
            disconnected (but entangled) supersymmetric interactions.

            The transformation of Anti-EMR into GR at the instanton fss=tps
            demands the nonexistence of Antimatter and suppresses the AntiHB's
            process of restmass-inducing the VPE-sinksources of the magnetic
            monopolic current-knots to become particles defined in antimatter.
            The 12 monopole junctions in the UFoQR and their defining para-
            meters, restrict, for example, the manifesto of the MCY-anti-
            matter blueprint to the Pair-Production/Annihilation circuit
            8-9-10-9-8 over 337 degrees and encompassing an even pi-EMI-point,
            necessary to manifest the Electromagnetic Interaction.
            The EMI-point is a root of the UF-waveequation at junction #9 and
            couples lefthanded matter YCM to righthanded antimatter MCY.
            There are no zeroes for individuated YCM or MCY production, but the
            EMI-point allows the creation of antineutrinoes in the template
            (RRGGBB)(+1/2).
            Since there is no odd pi-GI point in that interval, no neutrino-blu-
            prints (BBGGRR)(-1/2) are available and the process of Pair-
            Production in (YCM+MCY=VPE) requires mass to be present to allow it
            to occur.

            The general generation of the Matter-Antimatter templates became
            fixed BEFORE (imeindependent Order Principality) the UF-wave-
            function (UF=pi/4{sin[3x/2]-cos[3x/4]} became the Gravity-Inclusive,
            wave[propagation, superposing upon the original generator, given in
            (uf={sin[x]+sin[-x]}), which did establish the EMI-GI junctions, as
            an EMR-ANTIEMR propagtion for the linearisation of the superbranes.

            [Eq.#1] establishes the Energy-Equivalence modulated by UF in the
            Black/Einstein & White/Planck DoubleIdentity.
            This B-W duality defines 8 permutative states, which are assumed
            as the colourcharges of the One Gluon as the ForceCarrier for the
            Strong-Nuclear-Interaction (SNI) in the Octet: {BBB, BBW, BWB, WBB,
            WWB, WBW, BWW and WWW}.

            The magnetopolic junction-knots, defining the UF are defined in the
            following analysis, using definitions utilised before.

            [ec]=(Quantum Displacement Current)(Planck-Oscillation Displacement)
            =(n).2efss.(e/c^2)=(n).2efss.lP.Alpha^1/2=OlP.c^3

            Integer (n)=ec^3/(2fss.e^2)=c^3.fps/2e=81x10^54/(2e),
            which using the dimensionless qualities maps magnetocharge e* onto
            electrocharge e as:
            (n)=81x10^54/1000=81x10^51,

            which is an integer, by definition e*=1/Eps=1/(hfps)=fss/h
            =Constant#4/(3x10^30)=15x10^32/(3x10^30) by algorithmic definition
            and the determination of lps=c/fps in the Heisenberg Finestructure.

            This indicates that 81x10^51 magnetocharged current elements com-
            prise one monopolic mass in the mappings between e* and e.

            Define Unified Action [h]u=[e.e*]u and OlP-Displacement [e/c^2]u;
            then mo=hf/c^2=[hc/OlP]u=[ee*.c^3/e]u=[ec]u.
            This shows the equivalence of mass mo to the magnetic monopole
            quantum [ec], manifesting supermembrane IIB in the form of the
            magneto-electricity.

            We can now set a general evolvement for the e*-e mapping in the
            Black Hole spectra, as indicated in the previous discussions.

            The Schwarzschild radii are lower bounded in wormhole radius rps,
            restricting Black Hole Masses to be above Mlimit=rps.c^2/(2Go) kg*.
            This calculates to (15c^3.lps/2pi)=6445.775195 kg*.
            But this is also (15(ec in eV)lps/2pi) kg*, reducing the Black Hole
            minimum mass in the ratio c^3/[ec]=1 in F-Space, but calculates as
            5.602393139x10^35 in C-Space, which is the Planck-Length-Oscillation
            in terms of OlP=lpAlpha^1/2=1.784951493x10^-36.

            A Mass-Spectrum: mPlanck-..[ec]..-mps---m(elementary Particle)=h/l.c
            proportions to: lPlanck-..l[ec].-lps---2Re (electronic diameter).

            This mapping in the scale indicated is the cause for the phenomena
            in the quantum realm to remain atomically restricted.

            The electronic radius Re=10^10.lps/360 and it is that wormhole
            perimeter, as eigendefinition for the generating supermembrane
            EpsEss; which defines the minimum/maximum conditions and henceforth
            the manifestation of the quantification scenarios.

            MicroBlack Holes so are defined in the mass of the magnetic monopole
            and the superbrane hierarchies.

            In particular the [ec=c^3] energy defines the threshold for the
            Gamma-Ray Bursters and the Cosmic Ray Maximum.
            The Superbrane IIA (Ecosmic Superbrane) forms the energy threshold
            for the 'knee' in the Cosmic Ray spectrum and Superbrane EpsEss
            the 'ankle' therein.

            The Hawking Radiation of 'evaporating Black Holes' manifests not as
            a virtual energy, but as White Hole/Quasar Luminosity, maximised in
            the SourcePower per Unitmass:
            [E]u=mps.c^2[fps/mps]u=[fps]u.c^2=2.7x10^47 (Monopolic Watts/kg)*.

            The Unification Frequency [f]u also derives from the monopole mass
            [ec] via: [I]u=[ec/l]u=e[f]u=>e*[f]u=2Re.c^2.[f]u=[c^3]u, by the
            definitions [2Re]=[l]u=1/lss=lps and M={Eps/Ess}fss={fps^2}/lss.c
            and the entropy counter for mss as the supermembrane coupling
            constant applied to 360.Re=10^10lps.

            Hence [f]u=[M]u=(3/2)MSun =MChandrasekhar (Upper Limit).
            Now a 'young' and typical Neutron Star is born with Schwarzschild
            Radius Rns=2GoM/c^2 which, for MChandrasekhar gives 7407.4074 m*.
            [Eq.#12] relates the Temparature as: TChandra=19.846564 Billion K*.

            Hence: TChandra=4Go^3MChandra^2.mc^2/(c^4.k.Re^3) K* [Eq.#13]

            A planetesimal-generating boundary is calculated by Googolplex E for
            a temperature of so 1.2 Billion K* for Rylem=1.82144 km*.

            Periodic Magnetic Fields for Neutron Stars (and all massive spinning
            bodies) are related by modifying the Biot-Savart-Equation in the
            utility of the superbrane parameters.

            The Biot-Savart Law: B=muo.Qv/(4piR^2) transforms to:

            B(x)=pi.M/(T.c^2.R(x)) (Tesla), [Eq.#14]

            where period T relates a radial scalefactor R(x) for a magnetic
            field B(x) at a distance R(x) fromthe centre of the massive body.
            Using the above expression, say for a spinning planet Earth with
            a differential mantle-core radius of 1.2x10^6 metres and a core-mass
            of 9x10^22 kg, calculates the Earth's magnetic field at so 0.3 gauss
            projected as average flux-core differentiation.
            Plasma emitting bodies (say Solar Wind) are modified in the
            alternative expression for Biot-Savart:

            Bionisation=muo(ec)(v/c)N/(8piRcorona^2) Tesla;

            N is the 'lightmass fraction' relative to a typical nucleon (proton)
            and uses 2e=e* in the chargecounter Q=ne.
            A 'naked' Magnetic Flux of 462 gauss for the sun so becomes enhanced
            to 2800 gauss, using the Chandrasekhar Mass and the solar parameters
            with v=800 km/s and a solarplasma emission of 3.5 Million tons per
            second for a coronalradius of 2.8x10^8 m for the solar core.

            Modular duality for a Solar Period P=c/lSun=346410161.5 s* for
            a halfcycle oscillation of 10.98 years/sidereal.
            This solar geometry maps the trisected quark geometric blueprint
            (and the epsilono/muo geometric definition using the partitioning
            for c^2) in a unit solar radius l'=lSun.sec(30 degrees).

            A 'Quasi-Evaporation' reflects the subatomic duality B<->W, (mani-
            festing most apparently in quark-antiquark couplings acting on VPE).
            A SourceSink ellipsoidal focalisation in locally connected F-Space,
            appears nonlocally quantum entangled in C-Space.
            Negative Imaginary Mass becomes superparitive Positive Mass in:
            -mc^2[B->W](superparity 11D-mirror)[W->B]mc^2.
            Radiation/Antimatter form Quasar-coupled Output RGB.MCY, mirrored in
            Antiradiation/Matter unified Input BGR.YCM for AntiQuasar/BlackHoles
            in antiphotonic graviton definitions.
            (Photons, Gluons and Gravitons, all have a RGB or BGR Ylem-Template).

            We can now define a lower limit for the MicroBlack Holes.
            Using 2Re as de Broglie wavelength: Mmin=h/(2Re.c)=hc/e*=4x10^-28 kg*

            This is near the protonucleonic mc=9.924724523x10^-28 kg* and in a
            way defines the Mean Protonic Radius as Rp=Re/2=1.38888..x10^-15 m*.
            This is modulated by the de Broglie wavelength for the minimum given
            in 4x10^-28 m* and a maximum provided by mc.Y^n for any cycletime n.

            A nucleonic mass Mn so is finestructered in its square via the ex-
            pression:
            Mn(1).Y^[i].Mn(2).Y^[j], where i+j=n and nucleonseed mc^2 [Eq.#15].

            The energies associated with nucleonic point-masses, become then
            monopolically mapped onto the supermembrane spectrum and manifest as
            the spectrum of the Cosmic Rays above 0.2240957256 GeV* as MicroBlack
            Holes or some other VPE-associated labelling.

            4. THE PRECISION MEASUREMENT OF G

            We find ourselves now in a position to reexamine our first
            approximation for 'G' in [Eq.#7].

            G(n)=Go.X^n [1 + Mo.Y^(n/2)/Mcritical].
            This gave G(npresent)=6.684953x10^-11 (m^3/kg.s^2)-SI with
            Calibration-Constant between (SI) and (*) as: 1.000692265(*)=(SI).

            Our second approximation gave G(npresent)=6.67770177x10^-11 G-units,
            simply by reducing the first approximation in the Hawking Modulus
            (hm)^2=1.001085887 = 2MHawkingmax.Mcritical/Mo^2.

            We discovered the slight noncorrelation between the perfect square
            of the MassSeedling Mo to the product of the critical bound from
            the deceleration parameter and the cosmic architecture (Sarkar
            Constant) and the Temperature minimised Hawking bound.

            The procedure is selfevident.
            Instead of using the correlation of the macromasses, we use a mapped
            correlation between the micromasses, who as shown previously, define
            the MicroBlack Hole spectrum tothat of the magnetic monopole as
            Cosmic Ray manifestations.

            Mass-Seed Mo is defined in 2e(Mo/mc).Eps.e=Eo=[Ee^2/Alpha]^1/2,
            where the Charge-Seed Eo=[Ee^2/Alpha]^1/2 for Googolplex E.
            This derives the parameters for the F-Space in [Eq.#5].

            Alpha.Eo^2=Ee^2 <=> G-Alpha=Omega=2pi.Go.mc^2/hc=Alpha^18, the ratios
            explicitely defined in the pentagonal symmetry of the Unification
            Polynomial: P(X)=(1-X)(X)(1+X)(2+X)-1=0
            This leads to the mappings:
            S=STRONG NUCLEAR INTERACTION; E=ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTION;
            W=WEAK NUCLEAR INTERACTION and G=GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION
            (1)[S]:(X)[E]:(X^2)[W]:(X^3)[G]=(1-X):(X):(1+X):(2+X)

            Unity(1) maps as (1-X) transforming as f(S) in Identity (1-X)=X^2;
            (X) maps as invariant of f(E) in Identity (X)=(X);
            (X^2) maps as (1+X) as f(W) in Identity (1+X)=1/X and
            (X^3) maps as (2+X) as f(G) in Identity (2+X)=1/X^2.

            This sets the coupling between f(S) and f(E) as X;the coupling
            between f(E) and f(W) as X^2 and the coupling between f(W) and f(G)
            as X again.

            Analysis of the universal wavefunction B(n)=(2e/hA).exp(-Alpha.T(n))
            is symmetric about FRB=-1/2 and renormalising B(n) about the FRB
            defines a probability distribution for finding the FRB fluctuation
            for the interval [-X,X-1] in a volume element (dV) as the
            uncertainty fluctuation in (y^2)dV for the expression of:
            y(0)={Alpha/2pi}^1/2 and the Schwinger factors in QED of the
            hindsight.

            This volumar sets the dimensional intersection of CMF_Space in the
            topologacal mapping of complex Riemannian C-Infinity space about the
            Riemann Pole of the FRB.

            But (-X(X-1)=0.2360679776=X^3 thus defining a new unity as the
            mapped Identity [#^3=ALPHA] and the precursive unity of (X) as:
            (#=Cuberoot of Alpha) in the symmetry {#:#^3=f(S):f(E)}.

            This sets the important definition of: Feynman-Alpha=1/(Alpha)^1/2
            as the Strong Interaction Constant at XL-Boson 'time' of the
            GUT-SEW unification for superbrane HO(32) and is there so 11.7
            times weaker than at the instanton tps=fss.

            The pentagonal symmetry so becomes:
            {f(S):f(E):f(W):f(G)=#:#^3:[(#^3)^3]^2:{[(#^3)^3]^2}^3}
            =Alpha^1/3:Alpha:Omega^1/3:Omega=#:#^3:#^18:#^54.

            This then sets the experimentally measured forceratios between the
            elementary interactions and we are justified to consider the electro-
            magnetic interaction in modular symmetric associations described.
            The Strong-Electromagnetic Coupling is mirrorted in the Weak-
            Gravitational Coupling.

            Since Mo is proportional to mc, both subject to the evolvement of
            their baryonic 'awareness' in the Y-factor of the symmetry; we unify
            that 'growth' in manifested magnetocharge energy with a corresponding
            diminuition in the electrocharged permittivity and the X-factor for
            an unobservable dance between the omnipresent exchange of Starcou-
            lombic Magnetopoles with Coulombic Electropoles.

            We so define:
            G(n)=Go.X^n[mc.Y^n/2]^2.[Mo.Y^n/2]^2/{2Mn^2.Mcritical.MHawkingMax}
            =Go.Y^n.[mc^2/Mn^2]/(hm)^2 where Mn^2 is the partition [Eq.#15].

            This calculates as: G(npresent)=(1.093259031x10^-64)Y^npresent/M^n^2
            (kg.m^3/s^2)-units.
            The roots of the quadratic: np^2+np-2.414792841=0 yield a real root
            npresent=1.132419321 in C-Space and its imaginary F-Space mapping
            npresent=-2.132419321.

            For real npresent then: G(npresent)=1.88531844x10^-64 G/kg^2-units.

            This represents the precision measurement for G, as the partitioning
            of Mn^2 depends on the interaction of the nucleonic states.
            The upper bound are two protonic point-masses, bounded in the growth
            of the de Broglie mass 4x10^-28 kg* and the lower bound are two
            neutronic point-masses.

            For a Neutron Restmass of: Mneutron=1.680717x10^-27 kg* (941.6036 MeV*)
            the substitution gives: G(npresent)=6.678764x10^-11 (m^3/kgs^2).

            A perturbation corrected Mneutron=1.681100563x10^-27 kg*
            or (941.818626 MeV*) for: G(npresent)=6.675715x10^-11 'G'-units.

            The perturbation upper limit is given in Mneutron=1.681335x10^-11 'G-units
            or (941.9506 MeV*) for: G(npresent)=6.6738445x10^-11 'G'-units.
     
             The average for the last two values then approximates a 'best fit'
             for: G(npresent)=6.6747798x10^-11 'G'-units.  

            This is a best-fit approximation, considering the uncharged nature of
            the testmasses.

            Two protons (Mproton=1.6789x10^-27 kg* (940.56 MeV*)) would give:
            G(npresent)=6.6936x10^-11 G-units and a proton-neutron pair, would
            yield G(npresent)=6.6791x10^-11 G-units, both of the latter
            values unsuitable because of the electrocharges increasing the
            intraquarkian Magnetocharge coupling between the two mesonic
            rings of the neutron and the single mesonic ring in the proton's
            down- or KIR-quark.

            The best approximation for 'Big G' hence depends on an accurate
            determination for the Neutron's inertial mass.
            A fluctuating Neutron mass would also result in deviations in 'G',
            independent of the sensitivity of the measuring equipment.

            The difference in the protonic-and neutrinoic restmasses, derives
            from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Scale and can be stated in a first
            approximation as the groundstate.

            Basic nucleon restmass is mc=Omega^1/2.mPlanck=9.9247245x!10^-28 kg*.
            KKK-Kernelmass=Up/Down-HiggsLevel=3x319.62 MeV*=958.857 MeV*,using
            the Kernel-Ring and Family-Coupling Constants.

            Subtracting the Ring-VPE (3L) gives the basic nucleonic K-State as
            939.642 MeV*. This includes the electronic perturbation.
            For the Proton,one adds one (K-IR-Transition energy) and for the
            Neutron one doubles this to reflect the up-down-quark differential.

            Proton (mp=u.d.u=K.KIR.K=(939.6420+1.5013-0.5205)MeV*=940.6228 MeV*
            Neutron (mn=d.u.d=KIR.K.KIR=(939.6420+3.0026-1.0410)MeV*=941.6036 MeV*.

            This is the groundstate from the Higgs-Restmass-Induction-Mechanism.
            and reflects the quarkian geometry as being responsible for the
            inertial massdifferential between the two elementary nucleons.

            All groundstate elementary particle masses are computed from the
            Higgs-Scale and then become subject to various finestructures.

            The quantum geometry of internal subatomic particles is responsible
            to manifest the interaction between colourforce based magnetocharges
            and electrocharges.
            UNLIKE KERNEL-RING QUARK-GEOMETRIES ATTRACT, because of their unlike
            magnetocharges between them and LIKE KERNEL-RING QUARK GEOMETRIES
            REPEL,due to those magnetocharges being alike.

            The determination of Newton's Gravitational Constant to any degree
            of precision hence requires the measurement of nucleonic energies;
            and taking the exchange of magnetocharges as mass-displacement
            currents into account.

            Improving the mensuration for the Neutron-Mass finetunes 'Big G'.

            In cosmological considerations the constant form of G can often be
            used as Go=1.1111111..x10^-10 G*-units and reflecting the overall
            invariance of the mass parameters set at the beginning of the
            cosmogenesis.

            In fraternity                                          Sirebard Beardris