You are invited to join us at the second biennial

 

 

SOAS SHIT CONFERENCE

An interdisciplinary conference on excrement, past, present and future

 

to be hosted at University College London

Tuesday 18 – Wednesday 19 November 2025

 

 

VENUE: Bartlett Development Planning Unit, UCL, London WC1H 9EZ

 

DATE: Tuesday 18 – Wednesday 19 November 2025

 

[The dates are, respectively, World Shit Day and the UN’s World Toilet Day]

 

FORMAT: In-person conference, with possible distance presentations.

 

ADMISSION: Free, and open to the general public. You are requested to register in advance [see below].

 

Conference Prospectus

 

The starting point for our 2023 conference was the collecting and trading of human and animal excrement as an organic fertiliser, both solid and liquid, throughout the ages.

 

However, this is one of those commodities that dares not speak its name, due to taboos that surround the topic. The widespread euphemism ‘nightsoil’ is one of many that obscures the subject.

 

We therefore felt it necessary to work within an interdisciplinary frame of reference, and to extend our brief into a wider terrain, probing the social, psychological, and cultural issues arising out of this most human of topics.

 

The 2025 conference continues that interdisciplinary vein.

 

However, this year we shall also continue work that we began in 2023 – to work towards the drafting of a Shit Manifesto that can provide a framework for future campaigning and activism.

 

We invite all persons who are interested to join us at the conference.

 

REGISTRATION: To register for the conference, please write to:

 

    [email protected]

 

Please note that, in today’s parlance, we shall deal with both poop and pee.

 

We also request that you circulate this conference invitation to colleagues who may be interested.

 

 

_____________________________________________________

 

 

LIST OF SPEAKERS

[listed in alphabetical order]

 

_____________________________________________________

 

 

1. An ethnography of toilet practices at SOAS, University of London

 

Ed Emery [SOAS, London]

 

2. A proposition for faecal typologies in archaeology

Eleanor Green [University of York]

 

3. From infrastructure to inclusion: gendered and intersectional insights for sustainable sanitation

 

Pascale Hofmann [University College, London]

 

4. From valuable fertiliser to disgusting trash (and back?) – a German city history of shit and the social construction of value

 

Lina Kieseritzky [Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany]

 

5. Sketching the genealogy of contemporary dry toilets

 

Marine Legrand [Research fellow, LEESU (ENPC, France)]

 

6. “Our condition is most close to the joyous redemptions of shit” – Scatopolitical fragments

 

Cy Lecerf Maulpoix [EHESS/CEMS, Paris]

 

7. Caught short on the stressful streets: the lack of public toilets in Kilburn, north London 

 

John Miles [Kilburn Older Voices Exchange (KOVE)

 

8. Beyond the sewer: the stable assumptions yet unstable future of the freshwater-flush toilet

 

Sarah Nahar and Nick Kawa [The Ohio State University]

 

9. Moving bowels and the moving image: faeces on film in the age of mechanical reproduction

 

Benjin Pollock [Independent researcher]

 

10. Blood and shit: what public toilets tell us about periods

 

Lauren Powdrell [SOAS, London]

 

11. Bad investments and the enshittification of Britain

Matt Schneider [University of California, Los Angeles]

 

12. To pee or not to pee: youth navigation of shared sanitation in Mumbai’s informal settlements

 

Hoang Tran [Independent researcher]

Riddhi Khandhar [Independent researcher]

 

__________

 

ABSTRACTS

__________

 

A proposition for faecal typologies in archaeology

Eleanor Green [University of York]

 

Abstract: A large part of archaeological research is the investigation of rubbish and waste. Arguably faeces is the epitome of human waste. The content of our most shameful byproduct reveals a great deal about our lives and health. Today's flush and forget society leaves little need for sanitation consideration amongst the general public, but for most of human history a key question has influenced societal organisation: what we can do with all this shit?

 

In this talk I will give a brief overview of historical sanitation before exploring some of the conditions faeces does survive in the archaeological record. As a bioarchaeologist, I consider how these different preservation mechanisms affect the survival of biomolecules within the faecal matrix. Due to the fundamental differences of these materials I propose a typology which could be applied in archaeological settings to further the analysis of preserved faeces. Think archaeology meets the Bristol Stool Chart! 

 

CV:

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

From valuable fertiliser to disgusting trash (and back?)a German city history of shit and the social construction of value

 

Lina Kieseritzky [Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany]

 

Abstract: An implementation of sustainable approaches for the processing of shit is currently limited by a socially widely established devaluation of shit as trash. Nevertheless, shit used to be valued in the past and has been seen for a long time of civilisation as a useful fertiliser. A historical perspective reveals an era of radical change regarding the handling, practice and social valuation of shit at the end of the 18th century. The evolution of dungpiles to cesspits and later to water closets is embedded in a history of technological advancements, science and reconfiguration of social values regarding hygiene and any kind of dirt. While the development of public sewage systems did play an important role for improving hygienic conditions and health, the perception of feces changed. These developments shaped not only infrastructure and laws – it also shaped the social construction of shit as trash. This contribution will use the German city of Leipzig as an example to trace the history of change in many central and western European cities during that time.

 

CV: Lina Kieseritzky is a master's student in sociology at Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany. In her current master's thesis, she examines practices and perceptions surrounding the handling of feces and urine in Germany by conducting qualitative interviews on contemporary implementations and analysing historical documents. Her academic interests center on urban and spatial sociological perspectives on public toilet inequality as well as sanitation and nutrient transitions. Her bachelor’s thesis explored how public restrooms or their absence shape the co-construction of space and gender. She applies qualitative research methods and is dedicated to uncovering the links between sanitation, social inequality, and urban life.

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

“Our condition is most close to the joyous redemptions of shit” – Scatopolitical fragments

 

Cy Lecerf Maulpoix [EHESS/CEMS, Paris]

 

“We gays know this very well, and our condition is most close to the joyous redemption of shit ,” wrote italian activist Mario Mieli. This presentation aims not only to redeem the place of excremental matter in queer experience and imaginaries, but also to analyse the biopolitical processes that regulate and discipline the lives of dissidents of the sexual and racial order in relation to more specific forms of « scatopolitics » (McGlotten; Webel, 2016) organizing the flow, management, and exclusion of excremental matter.

 

Starting from Sigmund Freud's concept of Erdenrest, which articulates the very notion of modern civilization with abjection through excrement and sexual shame, this presentation will explore different perspectives through various critical fragments. Amongst others: a critique of the shame of shit through social media and porn hygienism; a quick history of abject masculinities during the French Revolution; a study of the links between “gay bowel syndrome”, shit and the AIDS epidemic; sexual imperialism and post-colonial internet jokes around eating feces; an emancipatory reinterpretation of Bruno Latour’s concept of « earthling » through different texts produced by queer and gay activists of the 70’s.

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

Poo constellations: systematic therapy for human excreta management

Marieke Meesters [University of Sheffield and Twente University, Netherlands]

 

Abstract: This contribution presents a workshop methodology that adapts family constellation therapy principles to address human excreta management. This research project draws on scholarly observations that social science research mimics therapy for allowing people to be heard, for creating space to reimagine relations, and to prefigure possibilities to act. Family constellation therapy focuses on non-verbal and unconscious communication and dynamics within family systems. Participants explore such dynamics through spatial positioning and phenomenological awareness. Building on this established therapeutic methodology, I am developing a novel research approach that applies constellation methodology to explore affects, practices and perspectives vis-à-vis human excreta flows and their potential uses within agricultural contexts. In the workshops, therapeutic facilitators guide participants through representative positioning exercises, physically mapping relationships between key stakeholders, materials, and processes within sanitation and agricultural waste systems. Through systemic questioning and targeted interventions, participants identify and resolve blockages in their perceptions of and practices concerning feces and urine management patterns, addressing cultural taboos and social barriers that impede effective nutrient recycling. The project is currently in active development in collaboration with therapeutic practitioners, and seeks additional collaborators to refine constellation representative roles, to develop appropriate inquiry frameworks, and to design effective systemic interventions for sustainable agriculture, sanitation and water use contexts.

 

CV: Dr Marieke Meesters (University of Sheffield, Twente University, Netherlands) is an interdisciplinary social scientist who works at the interface of prefigurative and anticolonial research and more-than-human ethics. She currently explores how human-poo relations in the UK and the Netherlands influence human excreta management, and artistically

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

Caught short on the stressful streets: the lack of public toilets in Kilburn, North London 

John Miles [Kilburn Older Voices Exchange (KOVE)

 

Abstract: KOVE was set up in Camden in 2001 as a community development project, based in a local authority day centre close to Kilburn High Road. Working with the multi-media project Acting Up, coordinator Mel Wright aligned older people’s understanding of the inhospitable street environment with their sense of civic responsibility. ‘For Your Convenience’ (2006,) filmed in the street, captured the outrage of older and younger residents alike at the lack of toilets on the mile-long shopping street, once known as ‘the Oxford Street of North-West London’. Public toilets are not a statutory requirement and local authorities began closing them in the 1980s, a process which intensified in the last couple of decades. But drawing attention to the problem and resolving it are very different things. In this paper I explore the twists and turns of KOVE’s efforts over twenty years, highlighting the decision to collaborate with other groups which emerged with the publication of the Toilet Manifesto for London in 2021 and has since been consolidated with the formation of the London Loo Alliance. I explore why such an initiative has only recently emerged; examine the shifting of taboos around pee and poo in KOVE’s more recent films and reflect on the balance between the argument from need - ‘caught short’ and the ‘loo leash’ - and the argument from nuisance - public defecation and vandalism - ‘rocking (or wrecking) the bowl’. Finally, I consider how the shit might hit the fan if this conversation continues to develop but the government does nothing and thereby fails to deliver within an ethic of care.

 

References:

 

Bichard, J-A and Ramster, G 2025 Designing Inclusive Public Toilets: Wee The People Bloomsbury Visual Arts, London 

 

Stamwell-Smith, R 2019 Taking the P***: The Decline of the Great British Public Toilet Royal society of Public Health, John Snow House. London 

 

https://kove.org.uk/short-films/ 

 

CV: After a few years in street theatre I started as a community development worker with older people since 1978. I was Hackney’s carer support worker during the 1990s, worked for Camden Council at the height of the Blair government’s programme Better Government for Older People and completed a doctoral study of the City of Manchester’s intergenerational initiatives in 2014. I served on the executive of the British Society of Gerontology from 2007 to 2013 and am currently chair of the Association for Education and Ageing. Besides my obsessions with toilets and jazz and composting I have been convenor of the Haringey Rivers Forum since 2018. 

__________

 

Moving bowels and the moving image: Faeces on film in the age of mechanical reproduction

 

Benjin Pollock [Independent researcher]

 

This paper raises a simple but awkward question: where is all the shit on screen? The most banal of human functions is almost entirely absent from the history of cinema and the moving image. Its erasure is striking, and when it does appear—whether in Buñuel’s surrealist toilets or Pasolini’s infamous excretions—it produces a radical rupture. Such moments unsettle not only narrative and form, but also the function of art in everyday life and the spectator’s embodied relationship to the world around them.

 

Drawing on Walter Benjamin’s account of cinema as a site where collective perception and consciousness are reshaped and reorganised, I argue that shit (and its erasure) on screen marks a radical frontier. This paper explores what is at stake when visual culture is forced to confront human waste. Through a series of case studies, it demonstrates how the repression and occasional expression of faeces in film reveals as much about modernity’s sanitising impulses as its rare, scandalous appearances reveal about cinema’s capacity to provoke and unsettle.

 

By tracing this double (bowel) movement of absence and presence, the paper shows how excrement and waste on film compel us to reframe the politics of representation: not as marginal, but as central—exposing the conditions of production, reproduction, and denial that underpin screen culture. This is a call to take shit seriously: not merely as provocation, but as the ground on which cinema’s most radical possibilities might yet emerge, transforming society’s repressed relationship to excrement and the body.

 

CV:

 

E-mail: [email protected]

 

__________

 

Blood and shit: what public toilets tell us about periods

Lauren Powdrell [SOAS, London]

 

Abstract: This paper interrogates the gendered design and regulation of public toilets in cities, with a focus on how these spaces have historically shaped – and continue to constrain – the visibility and management of menstruation. Public toilets, as critical infrastructures of modern cities, have long reflected social anxieties around bodily functions, particularly those coded as female. Through an examination of the evolving presence (and absence) of period bins, the paper traces the shifting politics of menstrual waste disposal and the persistent discomfort surrounding menstruation in public life. While public toilet provision expanded alongside urban development, the accommodation of menstruating bodies has remained partial, stigmatised, and often obscured.

 

Focusing on contemporary practices – such as the often-hidden or inadequate placement of period bins – and broader social narratives around “blood phobia”, this presentation explores how public toilets reinforce a spatial and symbolic marginalisation of menstruators. At the same time, the growing discourse around “blood liberation” and menstrual equity reflects a pushback against these norms, demanding that menstruation be made visible and legitimate in public space. By situating menstruation within the historical and spatial politics of urban toilet provision, this paper argues for a critical re-imagining of public toilets as inclusive, affirming spaces that recognise the full range of bodily needs.

 

CV: Lauren Powdrell is an LLM postgraduate in International Law at SOAS with a global focus on how menstruation intersects with human rights frameworks. Drawing on a background in English Literature and grassroots refugee rights campaigning, her work examines menstrual justice in contexts of displacement, detention, humanitarian crisis, and urban marginalisation. During her time at UN-Habitat, she developed a particular interest in how urban planning, public infrastructure, and inclusive policy shape access to safe and dignified menstruation.

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

Bad investments and the enshittification of Britain

Matt Schneider [University of California, Los Angeles]

 

Abstract: “We’re drowning in shit”, protesters outside Parliament proclaim. For years, bad news about British waterways and utilities has trickled incessantly: sewage dumps, swimming alerts, fish die-offs, regulatory fines, credit downgrades, investor writedowns – and yet, continued payouts to company executives and shareholders. Nothing seems to get better in this “effluent society,” sentiments channeled in Westminster at 2024’s March for Clean Water and online fora. Climate change promises to make the mess still worse.

 

I turned toward shit during 15 months of ethnographic research in London on the financial dimensions of climate change, involving interviews, multimedia analysis, waterscape fieldtrips, and regular participation in conferences and demonstrations. I thus approach Britain’s “shitstorm” at the confluence of two currents: financial professionals bringing matters of climate concern into water infrastructure investment and management; activists pinpointing the financialised character of private water companies as source of underinvestment, mismanagement, and pollution crisis as such. 

 

Extending Cory Doctorow’s viral notion of enshittification (originally naming the worsening-by-design of tech platforms) through a return to insights from Raymond Williams, this paper advances popular understanding of shitty situations and reimagines the political obstacles and opportunities for remediating them. While elaborating hydro-shitological and legal-financial technicalities, as well as partisan jockeying, I suggest that the essential political problematics here are affective investments in what can and cannot be done and how to feel about those im/possibilities. From natural byproduct of everyday life (increasingly unsustainable), to compoundingly externalised pollutant, to vernacular keyword for social incapacitation: Britain’s shit must be dealt with.

 

CV: Matt Schneider is a PhD candidate in Anthropology at the University of California, Los Angeles, where he co-leads the Water Resources Group in UCLA's Institute of the Environment and Sustainability. His research tracks diverse efforts to respond to climate change in the global financial system, ranging from activists and scientists to actuaries and asset managers. He has conducted 2 years of ethnographic fieldwork in the UK and Japan.

 

E-mail: [email protected]

__________

 

To pee or not to pee: youth navigation of shared sanitation in Mumbai’s informal settlements

Hoang Tran [London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine]

Riddhi Khandhar [London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine]

 

Abstract: This study explores how young people living in India’s urban slums experience and navigate the everyday reality of using communal toilets and bathrooms. In Mumbai, India’s most populous city, nearly half the population resides in informal settements where private toilets are scarce or unavailable. Community toilets, often a common alternative, tend to be overcrowded, poorly maintained, and raise concerns related to privacy, safety, and access.

 

The research examines how youth manage the prac1cal, social, and emotional challenges of using these shared sanitation facilities in their daily lives. Using visual methods alongside in-depth interviews, the study engaged young people living in urban slums to reflect on their experiences with communal sanitation. Through the personal narratives that emerged, participants described how they engage with, avoid, or adapt to shared toilets in their everyday routines. By positioning the experiences of using communal toilets in relation to precarity, the study highlights not only infrastructural and technical concerns, but how it is deeply related to social structures. This research contributes to interdisciplinary discussions on youth, urban poverty, and sanitation justice, offering insights that can inform more inclusive and context-sensitive sanitation policies and programs in rapidly growing urban areas.

 

Keywords: youth; urban sanitation; informal settlements; shared toilets; precarity; visual methods; public health; urban infrastructure; sanitation justice

 

CVs:

 

Hoang Tran is an MSc Public Health for Development student at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Her experience lies in qualitative research, with a broad focus on community engagement and health inequality—not only during health crises such as outbreaks, but also in the everyday realities of public health. Interested in the interconnectedness between the non-human and human, Hoang is currently conducting an ethnographic study in Vietnam that explores the intimate relationship between informal waste pickers and biomedical waste discarded in the environment.

 

Riddhi Khandhar is a mental health professional and MSc Public Health for Development candidate at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. She has led youth-driven health campaigns, developed trauma-informed psychosocial interventions, and conducted research on child protection, gender-based violence, and health promotion in urban and tribal settings. Her current research examines the mental health impacts of conflict-related sexual violence in humanitarian contexts. With experience in public health programming and qualitative research, Riddhi’s interests lie at the intersection of gender justice and health equity. She brings a field-informed perspective to participatory, policy-relevant research and practice.

 

E-mails:

 

[email protected]

 

[email protected]

_______

 

 

Ends