Local/State Campaigns to Attack Concentrated Poverty
Principles for National Policies to Attack Concentrated Poverty
TRANSPORTATION EQUITY
Communities of concentrated poverty in rural, urban and suburban areas are increasingly isolated from jobs in more affluent, job-rich areas within a metropolitan or rural region. Without public transit-access-to-jobs people cannot get to work, despite their desire to do so!
Some Powerful Grassroots Campaigns to Win Transportation-Access-to-Jobs:
In Indiana, the Interfaith Federation
waged a powerful campaign to win commitments from the Metropolitan Planning Organization to site a major commuter rail project through the populated areas of Lake County, to improve access to jobs for the majority of residents, instead of building a train to sprawl land benefiting only a few people.In Michigan, MOSES mobilized thousands of people to win $60,000,000 in increased state funding for public transportation despite opposition of the road builders’ lobby who said any added funding for public transit is "highway robbery.
In Chicago, the Metropolitan Alliance of Congregations, secured commitments from the MPO and Pace Bus Company to build a new bus line for 2nd shift and weekend workers to get to work.
In Denver Col., People United (PUF) won use of TANF (Welfare Reform) dollars for bus passes to work, auto insurance, and even funding toward the purchase of autos for travel to work.
Federal Campaign—1998 the Transportation Equity Network, with tremendous support from Congressman Danny K. Davis (7th Dist, Illinois) won $150,000,000/yr for six years for projects that improve transportation access to jobs for low-income workers.
Federal Policy Principles:
Increased Federal Funding for Public Transit that helps link people to jobs!
Increased Access to Jobs funding within TEA 21.
Hiring of local workers to build major transportation infrastructure projects (highway, railroad, airport, or otherwise) routed through or near low-income communities.
OPPORTUNITY-BASED HOUSING
Opportunity Housing is: housing in a community with an increasing job base--a developing (gentrifying) city neighborhood.
Opportunity Housing is: housing in a job-rich suburban community.
Opportunity Housing is not: Housing limited to areas with few job opportunities, in city neighborhoods or suburban communities of concentrated poverty, with high rates of unemployment. Community development efforts to improve housing in poor communities, as well as efforts to improve schools and services in every community, must be encouraged.
In addition, increased options are needed for families seeking a better life for their families and choosing to live closer to jobs in city or suburban communities.
Powerful Campaigns to Expand Opportunity Housing:
City/County Campaign
: PUF organization in Denver Col won Section 8 Preservation Ordinance: Landlords in Denver must give the city option to buy out their property when they go off section 8 program, in order to maintain opportunity housing for low income residents in gentrifying neighborhoodState Campaign: ISAIAH of Minnesota is waging a powerful campaign for Inclusionary Housing Legislation in the state of Minnesota, to expand housing options for low and moderate-income people in job-rich neighborhoods.
Federal Policy Principles:
HUD makes funding available for the purchase of units in new developments that meet standards of inclusionary housing policies as adopted by cities, states or counties. (An example would be Montgomery County, where a 20- year inclusionary housing policy gives the county’s public housing administration the right to purchase units in new multi-family developments, but the county has lacked funds to purchase the full number of available units.) Expand HUD’s program to provide opportunity housing investments (vouchers) and mobility counseling for people who want an opportunity to live in city or suburban non-poverty neighborhoods.
ENROLLMENT IN WELFARE REFORM PROGRAMS TARGETED TO POOR COMMUNITIES
Isolation from jobs, support services, and economic development has resulted in a growing concentration of welfare caseloads in poor urban, suburban and rural communities. The problem of economic isolation has been compounded by "light touch" enrollment policies of welfare official: "let’s wait for people who need services to come to us, instead of proactively reaching out to them and maximizing the impact of available services!" The success of welfare reform must be determined not by how many people can be removed from employment support services, but by the percentage of folks eligible for services that are actually enrolled, and by the percentage of people who go on to good jobs. Data shows that in poor communities, more families than ever are in need of enrollment in employment support programs, including food stamps, Medicaid, transportation and childcare assistance
.Powerful Campaign to win Enrollment:
In Wisconsin, HOSEA/WISDOM is waging campaign to force a welfare contractor, Maximus, to increase enrollment and to challenge state of Wisconsin to terminate Maximus. HOSEA met with Governor Thompson and secured commitments to advance a state policy to invest more resources in enrollment.
Federal Policy Principles:
As part of Welfare Reform Reauthorization, target additional resources to communities with high unemployment and high poverty rates for enrollment of eligible people in employment support services including children’s health care, childcare, transportation to jobs, food stamps, substance abuse treatment and public jobs.
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
Existing drug treatment programs are clearly inadequate to meet the need for People suffering from drug addiction find it difficult or impossible to secure and maintain AODA in poor communities. are addicted to drugs.
Powerful Campaign to expand Substance Abuse Treatment (AODA):
In Milwaukee MICAH/WISDOM won $10,000,000 in TANF (Welfare Reform) funds from the state legislature for AODA (drug treatment) in Wisconsin.
Federal Policy Principles:
As part of Welfare Reform Reauthorization, affirm use of TANF funding for AODA treatment in the states.
Provide matching federal funds for local or state government programs offering court-supervised drug treatment as an alternative for incarceration for non-violent offenders.
PUBLIC JOBS:
Areas of isolated concentrated poverty suffer from a lack of job opportunities. Because the welfare law requires welfare recipients to work, workfare abuses have too often been part of so called jobs programs. In communities where there are simply no jobs, cities and states should publicly funded jobs with training opportunities
Powerful Public Jobs Campaign:
The Philadelphia Employment Project (PUP) has waged a powerful campaign to win 3,000 public jobs in city and 15,000 in the state of Pennsylvania. The total of 18,000 is by far the best in the nation.
Federal Policy Principles:
Affirm use of TANF dollars for community jobs as part of welfare reform reauthorization.
Matching federal funds for community jobs programs in high poverty, high unemployment areas.
Extend time limits to at least 18 months for community jobs that do not count against welfare time limits.