RubiStar

  

Rubric Made Using:

RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.org )

 

>> To save this document onto your computer, please choose File :: Save As from your Browser Menu.

 

 

Temporary Rubric

This rubric is temporary. Your rubric will be deleted after July 01, 2004.

You must first log in as the author of this rubric if you wish to save the rubric.

 

 

Cell Organelle Analogy Collage


Teacher Name: Mrs. Young


Student Name:     ________________________________________

 

CATEGORY

Excellent 10 pts

Good 8-9 pts.

Satisfactory 6-7 pts.

Needs Work 0-5

Appropriateness of Analogies

The analogies created accurately represent the function of all 10 chosen organelles.

The analogies created accurately represent the function of 8-9 of the 10 chosen organelles.

The analogies created accurately respresent the function of 6-7 of the 10 chosen organelles.

The analogies created accurately represent the function of 5 or less of the 10 chosen organelles.

Originality

The collage contains 4 or more original analogies not found on the collages of other groups.

The collage contains 2-3 original analogies not found on the collages of other groups.

The collage contains 1-2 original analogies not found on the collages of other groups.

The collage contains 1-0 original analogies not found on the collages of other groups.

Visual Appeal

The format adheres to teacher specifications. The collage is very neat and makes very good use use of color and graphics.

The format adheres to teacher specifications. The collage is neat and makes good use of color and graphics.

The format of the collage somewhat adheres to teacher specifications. The collage is fairly messy and makes some use of color and graphics.

The format of the collage does not adhere to teacher specifications. The collage is very messy and makes very little use of color and graphics.

Presentation

Student analogy explanations are very clear and offer elaborate detail. The audience is able to follow.

Student analogy explanations are clear and offer some detail. The audience is able to follow.

Students analogy explanations are sometimes unclear and offer basic information. The audience, at times, is unable to follow.

Student analogy explanations are not very clear and offer little to no detail. The audience is unable to follow.

Group Participation

All 4 of the group members actively participated in the completion of the project.

3 of the 4 group members actively participated in the completion of the project.

2 of the 4 group members actively participated in the completion of the project.

Only 1 of the group members actively participated in the completion of the project.

 

Date Created: June 24, 2004

 


© 2001, 2002, 2003 High Plains Regional Technology in Education Consortium   HPR*TEC


To view information about the Privacy Policies and the Terms of Use, please go to the following web address:
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php?screen=TermsOfUse

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1