analyses of the experiences of a particular person,
group, or phenomenon.
Often focus on people whose extraordinary experiences
would be difficult or impossible to recreate in the laboratory. Example:
Beethoven
They are usually designed to delineate, corroborate,
or invalidate a particular theory or theories.
Example: Phineas Gage
This led to scientists understanding that damage
to specific brain areas is in fact associated with specific kinds of psychological
deficits.
WHAT MAKES A CASE STUDY SCIENTIFIC?
They are almost always a rich source of ideas for
theory building and can be used for theory testing as well
Case studies do not usually lend themselves well
to the use of operational definitions or statistical analyses.
Example; Sigmund Freud
case studies can fill in some important pieces of
the complex puzzle of human experience.
SINGLE-VARIABLE RESEARCH:
designed to describe some specific property of people
or of the social world.
These studies focus on one variable only!
May pave the way for more theoretically oriented
multiple-variable studies that require a descriptive foundation.
Example: studies that provide info. about the
prevalence of various mental illnesses.
Example: Epidemiological research:
form of single-variable research refers to the scientific study of the causes
of disease
RESEARCH ON PUBLIC OPINION:
important form of single-variable research
If you really want to know what people think about
something, you should ask a random sample of most people
research designed to determine the attitudes and
preferences of large groups of people such as voters or consumers
False consensus effect — shown that most
people overestimate the proportion of other people whose attitudes and
behaviors are similar to their own. Example: UCLA study — showed false
consensus effects on 25 of a total of 28 questions.
MULTIPLE-VARIABLE RESEARCH:
Archival Research:
often done when:
a topic is ethically sensitive,
when a variable is difficult or impossible to manipulate,
or when a researcher is especially motivated to conduct
a study that is high in external validity.
Refers to research in which investigators examine
naturally existing public records to test a theory or hypothesis.
Advantage: potential for high levels of external
validity
can be at least as high in internal validity as many
lab experiments —need to look out for potential confounds.
Disadvantage - can’t control the data.
OBSERVATIONAL RESEARCH:
the investigators record the real behavior of people
in their natural environments
difference between observational and archival research
is that in observational research the researchers are doing the observations.
Gives researchers some control over what they observe
and also how they observe it.
Best kind of observational research is usually unobtrusive
(researchers do not interfere in any way with people’s natural behavior,
people do not realize they are being studied).
Observational studies are about the same as archival
studies as far as external and internal validity goes.
Great potential for external validity — taking this
right from the environment!
Survey and Interview Research:
Asking people about their thoughts, feelings, and
behaviors.
Basic idea is to generate a fixed set of questions
and pose them to a large group of people
problem with this type of research is that of reverse
causality.
Inferences you draw really depend on how good the
survey is.
To minimize threats to internal validity — include
measures of potential confounds, write unambiguous questions, and take
other reasonable precautions).
THE QUESTIONNAIRE:
use existing questionnaires - can compare results
Determine the purpose of the questionnaire - what
do you want to accomplish?
Open-ended versus close-ended Questions
Open-ended questions
make it more likely that the questionnaire will discover
something not anticipated by its designers,
harder to code, because the answers are in narrative
form.
Need to categorize responses in some way in order
to summarize the data.
May be more useful for smaller and preliminary investigations
CLOSE-ENDED QUESTIONS
easier to analyze and there are fewer off the wall
answers
Respondents don't have to think as hard.
Tend to put words in the mouth of respondents and
get responses they might not have otherwise gotten.
A respondent may misinterpret a question or a clerical
error may be made.
Standardization of close-ended questions make them
more suitable for large studies.
Sometimes the two types of questions are mixed. Permitting
the data to be coded and analyzed easily, but giving some insights into
the reasons why the respondents chose the alternative that they did.
WRITING SURVEYS
Address a single issue per item
Make items unambiguous - should be clear and precise
Avoid bias - i.e., "do you believe in killing unborn
babies" vs. "should women be forced to bear unwanted children?"
Make alternatives clear - make sure the options are
distinctly different from one another and that they cover all of the possibilities.
Tendency for social desirability: when respondents
perceive one alternative as more socially acceptable than the other - word
questions so that each alternative appears equally socially desirable.
Likert scale - allows you to measure magnitude of
opinion, not just direction.
ADMINISTERING THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Face-to-face
rapport -
creates a social situation that may result in biased
responses.
more expensive (going to homes) and safety issues
exist too.
Written responses
group administration
high response rate
low cost
respondents are more anonymous
differences between individuals who respond and those
who don't.
ADMINISTERING THE QUESTIONNAIRE
Computerized administration
Convenient
low social desirability problems
Computer can control for errors.
Telephone administration
low cost,
rapid
can use computer-assisted interview
less anonymous
introduce possibility of interviewer bias
.However: Higher response rate and low cost when
compared to other methods.
QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE YOU BELIEVE A POLL:
Many surveys —especially those designed to influence
public opinion rather than just record it, do not produce accurate or useful
info.
who carried out the survey? Do they have some agenda?
Did they hire a professional sample survey firm?
What was the population? Whose opinions were being
sought?
How was the sample selected? Random sampling?
How large was the sample? Sample size
What was the response rate? What percent of the original
subjects actually provided information?
How were the subjects contacted? By telephone? Mail?
Face to face interview?
When was the survey conducted? Was it just after
some event that might have influenced opinion?