HOME

WHAT'S NEW FAQ

GLOSSARY

BIBLIOGRAPHY

AUTHOR'S BIO

Systemic Storytelling

Art is the expression of a culture’s worldview, which is the paradigm that underlies ideology, behavior, and perceptions of nature.  Images, sounds, and words are created as a self-reflexive extension of this paradigm, and as this belief system changes these forms of expression change as well, maintaining an ever-contemporary mirror of ourselves.  Today, as our culture stalls on its own technological progression, a new worldview is rising that is holistic in its perspective, supplanting the old reductionistic view upon which Western civilization was built.  Most commonly articulated by scientists in the form of dynamical systems theory, this new paradigm is guiding not only the fluctuation of our belief systems and behavior, but is also yielding new forms of personal and collective expression.  One of the strongest, most promising artistic extensions of this new worldview is the development of hypertext fiction.

Systems Theory: Patterns within Patterns

Systems thinking developed in the sciences over the course of the twentieth century, beginning with theories in physics and recently finding application in the study of patterns in social behavior.  Ultimately, this new approach to scientific understanding arose in response to problems that previous approaches could not answer.  The old paradigm—the collection of concepts, values, and techniques shared in the scientific community—sought to reduce a living or nonliving thing to its smallest components, believing that in the part lies the essence of the whole.  After discovering that there really were no independent elements in quantum physics and ecology, for instance, scientists began reversing this tendency.  Instead of viewing the universe, the environment, or even the human body as a machine operating according to the cause-effect behavior of its constituents, the new perspective encouraged a more holistic view of the “world as an integrated whole rather than the dissociated collection of parts” (Capra 6).  In other words, systems theory is a contextual approach to a problem, in which “the parts can be understood only from the organization of the whole” (ib. 29-30).

While the thrust of most systemic thinking has been applied to the codependence of biological or physical elements, human behavior has recently come under the umbrella of systems theory in the study of erodynamics.  Coined by Ralph Abraham, a leader in the field of chaos theory, erodynamics is the study of social systems as patterns of predictable variability, in which the results are displayed through “dynamical models, computer simulation, and the methods of chaos theory” (Abraham 236).  These simulations produce patterns called fractals, the visual representation of nonlinear equations.  Through this lens of chaos theory, human interaction (as well as any other natural system) is seen as “oscillations that almost repeat themselves, but not quite, seemingly random yet forming a complex, highly organized pattern” (Capra 17).  Instead of being viewed as random activity—often triggered by unrelated motives and without inferring future consequences—human behavior takes on the dimensions of the essential systemic phenomenon, in which a networked, nonlinear, and self-organizing structure allows for the fluctuation of constant change without losing the integrity of the system itself.  Truly random behavior cannot exist; it is simply an element of flexibility in the pattern of social interaction.

Hypertext Fiction: Patterns Expressed

Insight into the systemic quality of human behavior can be taken a step further by acknowledging changes in how that behavior is expressed through culture.  Just as the ideals of Greek philosophy were exemplified in marble statues and the Renaissance revived color and nature in their paintings, so too the development of nonlinear literature is emerging as an artistic example of how our worldview is changing.  Specifically, electronic hypertext fiction is one growing format of this kind of systemic storytelling.

Hypertext, as a medium and product of electronic communication, is diverse.  It is the format used by all successful websites, relaying technical and creative information to anyone with the technology to access it.  But its inherent structure diverges from the traditional forms of literature.  George Landow, a critical theorist of hypertext, defines the hypertext structure as:

text composed of blocks of words (or images) linked electronically by multiple paths, chains, or trails in an open-ended, perpetually unfinished textuality described by the terms link, node, network, web, and path. (3)

The terms that Landow uses are all systemic properties, creating a narrative that allows the flux of the same predictable variability of erodynamics.  While action is inhibited by certain restrictions, it is how the given choices are used that incite seemingly random activity to change the experience of the story—which is itself the encompassing, durable pattern of the activity.

Network: Systemic Structure

“The pattern of life, we might say, is a network pattern capable of self-organization” (Capra 83).  A network, consisting of multiple components that continually interconnect and branch out to one another, is a basic structure in nature—and in human thinking.  For example, an ecosystem is the most accessible model of a network in which the elements of climate, topography, and species populations all act as codependent nodes of influence in the environment.

We can then extend this model to the idea of a hypertext narrative being a digital ecosystem in which the segments of text compose the framework of a larger story.  Each narrative knot in the net is usually a completed scene in and of itself, but it provides multiple path options to follow.   This opens the narrative up into a web of scenes that function the same way, each providing a new view of the story, contributing additional information, and moving the story forward in some way.  But the progression to the story’s end is not direct or predetermined, because each choice a user makes at a node in the network creates a new path through the narrative.

Nonlinearity: Relationships Within the Network

Nonlinearity is the inherent dynamic of network relationships.  Aside from the complex abstraction of mathematics, the concept of a nonlinear relationship is often seen simply as a cycle, or feedback loop.  As one element influences another, a reciprocal—yet not necessarily equal—exchange develops.  For instance, in the model of the ecosystem,

relationships among the members of an ecological community are nonlinear, involving multiple feedback loops . . .[in which] a disturbance will not be limited to a single effect but is likely to spread out in ever-widening patterns.” (Capra 299)

This association may amplify certain aspects of the network, or reduce them depending on the imbalance of the relationship.

In applying this rather broad term to hypertext, one must look at how the various blocks of text impact one another and eventually build the narrative.  Hypertext fiction is not followed from beginning to end in a traditional, temporal sequence.  Instead, the narrative allows for tangential leaps—that are often “horizontal” in the narrative, adding information without necessarily driving the story forward in time.  It is through these leaps that associations are made between the various scenes.  Experiencing these seemingly random, yet interconnected blocks of text, leads to the discovery of the story itself. For example, Walter Sorrell’s online hypertext novel, The Heist, offers links to pieces of the narrative that simply provide background information or someone else’s perspective on the same event.  The plot doesn’t move forward; it is fleshed out with material that adds to the feel and understanding of the narrative instead.

Autopoiesis:  Organization of the Network

In his book, The Web of Life, Fritjof Capra provides an educated layman’s introduction to systems theory and how it was discovered in various areas of science—namely biology, neurology, and mathematics.  In this book, he defines autopoiesis as “ a network of production processes, in which the function of each component is to participate in the production of transformation of other components in the network” (98). 

Literally, the word means “self-making” in Greek, and is a concept of inherent, internal self-organization.  Ultimately it is the associative process that maintains the integrity of the system (be it a body or an environmental habitat) while still allowing for the chaotic fluctuations of the system as it is changed by external stimuli.  In many cases, it links the nonlinear quality with the network, performing as both process and structure.

In hypertext fiction, autopoiesis is implemented in two ways.  One is by the individual author in the way they map out the narrative to allow for various options but also tying each thread back into the story through loops in the reader’s path.  Yet, this concept lends itself more to the multi-author hypertext, where there is a partnership of reader and writer in which an evolving, but consistent organization of the text hold additions to the story together.  A good example of this is Gav and Peloso’s Interactive Story in which the reader comes to the end of a given path and must contribute the next scene to move the story forward.  However, there are only two links to spin-off of, which limits the new scene somewhat while still giving the new writer freedom to turn the plot in a new direction.  Each new contribution to the story changes the rest of the narrative experientially for the reader, but the pattern of the story itself is still intact.

Conclusion

As linear, historical, and mechanical thinking are dissolving in the midst of a change in our culture’s belief system, systemic storytelling emerges as the expression of this new holistic, nonlinear paradigm.  The limits of the author-controlled work of fiction are being eliminated and the reader begins to interact with and change the story.  Therefore, the reader becomes yet another node of the network, testing its pattern like the chaotic variables in a fractal.

Works Cited

  Abraham, Ralph.  Chaos, Gaia, Eros.  San Francisco:  Harper, 1994.

Bleuel, Darren and Chris Peloso.  Gav and Peloso’s Interactive Story.  16 March 2000.

Capra, Fritjof.  The Web of Life.  New York: Anchor Books, 1996.

Landow, George.  Hypertext 2.0.  Baltimore:  Johns Hopkins UP, 1997.

Sorrell, Walter.  The Heist.  16 March 2000.

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1