Overall the IPS ended up +-20
point difference for the year. I ask you, is it worth all this work for
just 20 points? If you think that it is, would you like to make the
call at the end of the year on a controversial IPS for the
championship?
The original concept of IPS is
great idea and there are some versions of the IPS that might be better.
However, instead of voting on all of these different versions of IPS we
should make a new amendment and vote on it.
Part of the goal for this
league is to keep things as simple as possible. Keeping things simple
makes it easier for everyone to interpret the rules. That way any coach
can run the league as commissioner.
2.
Last Week Winner
[ Yes | No ]
To try and keep the league
competitive and give those poor coaches that are at the bottom of the
rankings a chance at some money we have the amendment “Last Week
Winner”.
If you get 1st place
in the last week of the season you win.
The winning coach gets all
his/her transactions back. This achieves two things:
3.
Champ becomes
next years Commissioner [ Yes | No ]
I know this one is probably not a
fan favorite. However, in order to make this league everyone’s league
we need to share in the fun. What better way to do this than to
automatically make the Champ next years Commissioner.
Being Commissioner is easier than
it ever. The internet and the committee makes being Commissioner easy.
At least compared to how it used to be when all stats were taken out of
the newspapers (Before I joined the league that’s how this league was
run. And I thought I was obsessed). Plus, we have gone out of our way
to make being commissioner as simple as possible.
We need people to step it up
because we need fresh new ideas. We figure that if someone wins the
league they are probably Fantasy Football savvy and would make a great
commissioner. In fact the last two Champs have already been
commissioner.
We don’t want this league to
become a Dictatorship. With the same old people as Commissioner every
year.
With all the awards and money you
receive as Champ it’s the least you can do.
4.
World Record
Payouts [ Yes | No ]
We are handing out awards this
year. However, to make it even more exciting we would like to attach
some monetary value to it.
We would like to take 5% of the
pot every year and apply to the world records for the year. For
example, let’s say the total pot is $800 then $40 would apply to world
record pool. If we had 4 world records, that year each world record
would get $10. If no world records were broken that year then the $40
would go into next year’s world record pool. This would go on until a
World Record was broken.
2003: 20 world record *Total
number of World Records. First year to keep track
2004: 14 world records broken
(that includes a tie for DEF)
2005: ?
As the years pass by it will
be harder to break a World Record.
5.
Up the player
keepers to 3 players [ Yes | No ]
Title says it all. We would like to
increase the number of keepers from 2 to 3. Some people have suggested
we wait another year before we do this to see how the 2 players Keepers
workout.