First Published in Daily “DAWN”, Karachi, Pakistan, on April 17, 1992

 

UNDERSTANDING  AIDS FROM A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE

By

Prof Dr Mohammad Munir Hasan

 

 

Within a decade since it was first discovered, AIDS has become the most threatening disease in the world. In USA, according to some reports, the number of victims is doubling every year – rising from 8,000 in 1985 to over 250,000 in 1990. Scientists are trying hard to find a cure for this disease yet the outcome is still unpredictable.

 

Scientists and researchers have discovered the virus that causes AIDS. They are aware of various modes of its spread, but they are not yet sure how this virus originated. Various theories have been presented, but none has been considered acceptable. In USA it is considered mainly a disease of homosexuals, while the statistics from African countries show a different picture and it is spreading mainly by conventional intercourse among heterosexuals and is striking men and women alike. Looking at this drastic difference in the pattern some person think it is a mystery. However, if it is known how this disease originates, then not only will the mystery be resolved, but it will also be easy to find a cure for this disease.

 

By taking guidance from the holy Qur’an in which the bounds of the man-woman sexual relationship are defined, an explanation can be proposed for the creation of AIDS virus. It may be said that the semens of different persons are different in a similar way like different blood groups in the bodies of different persons. AIDS virus originates, or has greater chances to originate, whenever the semens of two different male persons combine in effect, directly or through hormonal changes, etc. in a body of hospitable environment, be it a male or female. However, this explanation has to be confirmed by thorough research to be carried out.

 

In a natural sexual relationship a man marries a woman. While polygamy is allowed in many religions and social set ups throughout the world, polyandry has never received general acceptance, and has been restricted as some rare tribal custom for some specific reasons. In general, no religion and no civilized section of the society in any part of the world allows the marriage of a woman with more than one man at a time. Socially, the sexual relation of a married woman with a man other than her husband is considered an immoral act, while religiously it is a sin. At the same time, the sexual relation of an unmarried woman with more than one man makes her a bad woman (prostitute). It is so because the sexual relations of a woman with more than one man at a time are unnatural, and like any unnatural act it is likely to have an unnatural result or outcome. So, by defining the bounds of the sexual relationship of a man with a woman nature has guided us and has tried to protect mankind from acquiring a disease, such as AIDS, which could be the result of coalescing the semens of two different persons in a body.

 

In the above, the social and religious aspects of a man-woman sexual relationship have been considered because this type of sexual urge is natural, and is respected if it is within the legal, social and religious bounds in the form of marriage. One can easily see that in all dignified and respectful man-woman relationship throughout the world there is no possibility of mixing the semens of two different male persons in a female body, and there is no chance of acquiring unnatural results. And whenever these bounds are broken, we must expect something unnatural to happen.

 

So, apparently, the chances of creating AIDS virus in heterosexuals are as good as in homosexuals, but there are some natural, medical and social reasons which make an important difference. Before I describe these reasons, let me propose and explain how the semens of two different male persons may be combined in effect even if the sexual acts are carried out days or weeks apart.

 

During intercourse when the semen of a male is ejaculated into a female or male body then part of it may be absorbed by the surface and/or enter the bloodstream or produce some hormonal changes in it. For the reasons described below, this effect may remain in the body of the female recipient for a maximum period of 65 days (the minimum period of three menstrual cycles), while in case of a male recipient this period could be even longer. And if during this period the semen of another person enters the body of the same recipient, then this may result in the creation of an AIDS virus. I have used the word “may” because the reaction of different bodies may be different, as in the case of any epidemic some persons are seriously affected, some mildly, and there are persons who are not affected at all.

 

Then why in USA it is generally considered a disease of homosexuals? If the process of the semen affecting the recipient’s body is the same in males and females then why are the chances of acquiring this disease not the same in different societies and in different parts of the world? This may be explained in terms of the reasons as described below.

 

1.          Nature has made the female body such that during every menstrual period some blood is discharged through the uterus. This bleeding process may tend to sterilize the body, thus reducing the risk of mixing the semens of two persons in the following two ways:

 

(a)         The blood lining thus formed in the uterus may act as a barrier for the semen or its effect to enter the lining of the uterus or enter the bloodstream thus reducing the effective area available for the action of the semen, and consequently reducing the risk from the second intercourse while the semen or hormonal effects from the first intercourse are already present in her bloodstream.  

 

(b)                The discharge of the blood from the uterus may have a flushing effect in the body. One menses may partially sterilize the woman from carrying these effects in her body and, if no intercourse takes place during this period, the action of three menstrual cycles may completely sterilize the woman, thus eliminating any possible risk of mixing the semen of two persons and creating AIDS virus.

 

The two processes described above relate to females only and so, in the absence of such specific functions in the males the chances of mixing of semens of two male persons are greatly increased in homosexuals.

 

It should be noted here that the chances of mixing two semens in a female body, as described above, are only decreased and not eliminated completely unless a woman keeps away from a second male partner for a minimum period of three menstrual cycles (65 days). This period has been suggested because in verse 2/228 of the holy Qur’an Allah has allowed the second marriage of a widow or divorced woman only after the expiry of this period which must be medically a complete safe period.

 

2.            In USA, Europe and other countries where there is a higher rate of literacy the persons are more aware about sex and, if not all, many of them might be using condoms while having sex with the females thus further reducing the risk of mixing the semens in heterosexuality, and further keeping the statistics of AIDS down among the heterosexuals.

 

Thus, the actual chances of mixing the semens of two male persons and creating AIDS virus in a male or a female body are not the same, and actually depend on social behaviour of the persons and other factors, as follows:

 

  • Social and cultural background of persons living in a particular area.

  • Respect of social and moral values in the society.

  • Number of prostitutes present in the society.

  • Number of homosexuals present in the society.

  • Number of bisexuals present in the society.

  • Number of persons having sex during menses.

  • Sex education and number of persons using condoms during sexual acts.

  • Laws controlling or preventing homosexuality.

  • Laws controlling or preventing prostitution.

  • Degree of effectiveness of these laws.

  • Sexual bonds defined in the religion of the persons living in a particular area.

  • Number of persons truly practicing the religion.

 

As can be seen, the above factors differ from place to place and so, the picture for each locality, city or country has to be different. However, from the reasoning as described above, and looking at the environmental, social, cultural and religious values prevailing in a particular society it should not be difficult to assess the status of AIDS in that city or country.

 

Thus, briefly, we can propose that emergence of AIDS in fact is the result of unnatural sexual acts of the persons living in a society. Nature has taught us how to keep away from this disease. So, research should be carried out in the light of the directives and bounds defined in the holy Qur’an. Apart from making efforts to control its spread through education, vaccines, drugs, etc. the very basis of creating AIDS virus should also be checked effectively otherwise even if a cure for the AIDS is found and the AIDS epidemic is controlled for the time being, which seems quite remote at the moment, persons will keep on creating the AIDS virus in large numbers with their unnatural sexual acts. The disease will never disappear and may emerge again and again as an epidemic at any time. In this case religion can play a powerful role.

 

____________________

 

 

 

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1