| Enemy at the Gates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stalingrad, 1942-43. It was the bloodiest single battle in the known history of war, with more than one million perishing of wounds, disease, and the bitter cold of winter. Like Napoleon a century earlier, Hitler came to Stalingrad with the aim of breaking the spirit of Russia, and, also like the little French general, he was faced with catastrophic losses. The toll taken upon the German army at Stalingrad represented one of the turning points of World War II. Most history experts agree that had Hitler not persisted in trying to take the Soviet city in what turned into a personal contest with Stalin, the Third Reich might have triumphed on its western front. Enemy at the Gates elects to view this historic conflict from the point-of-view of a limited group of characters, rather than attempting to tackle the battle in epic format. The film takes actual historic figures and tries to imbue them with the traits that allow their private struggles to mirror the overall conflict. Although, the underlying ideas of film are interesting and the production is technically adept, I had a hard time liking Enemy. The film has an emotional coolness that keeps the characters at a distance. The film also lacks dramatic tension. The movie always moves in the direction of the inevitable conclusion, with minimal suspense along the way. The historical backdrop is fascinating, but the struggle does not live up to the quote above. Enemy had all the elements necessary for a compeling war drama, but it lacked the character depth and its detached style made watching the movie an uninvolving experience. There were times I admired the film, but I was never really drawn into the story. The cat-and-mouse games between Vassily and Koenig, which tries to form the movie's backbone, are not suspenseful. Instead, they felt perfunctory and obilgatory. The various subplots as severly underdeveloped. The most interesting of these - Danilov's building up of Vassily's reputation (followed by a hurried attempt to tear it down) - is presented almost as an afterthought. In addition, the romantic triangle between Vassily, Danilov and Tania is written and developed on the level of a soap opera. The battle sequences, especially those with the bombs bursting in air over Stalingrad, are well sequenced, detailed and impressive. As soldiers are being transported across the Volga River to Stalingrad, the film's verisimilitude is enchanced by the cinamatography (mostly accomplished by the dim lighting, abundance of browns and grays and washing out the bright colors). As Vassily, Jude Law does a solid job re-creating the conflicted war hero who doubts his own prowess. As Major Koenig, Ed Harris delivers a strong screen presence the best he can with the underwritten part. These aspects of the movie might be its sole saving grace. Rating: 2 stars (out of 4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||