My name is Michael Misovich. I live at 630 Putnam St., in the Farrington Grove Elementary
attendance district, and my daughter attends there because we believe in
neighborhood schools.
As the president of the nonprofit organization Farrington's
Grove Historical District, Inc., I would like you to consider the effect of
closing Crawford Elementary on the children of our neighborhood and of the
larger community.
In addition to containing the opinion of the administration
that the school must be closed, the Crawford School study also contains some
facts. Ninety-four children will be
transferred from Crawford to Farrington Grove Elementary. I ask the administration and board: "Do
you believe 464 students is a small elementary school?"
"We want to do what we think is the right thing
educationally for students. ... Neighboring facilities would allow students at
Crawford School to be served more efficiently in optimum learning
environments." Similar things were
said when Warren Elementary was closed.
Did educational outcomes improve for Warren students after they moved to
Meadows and Lost Creek? The closest
answer I could find in the study was in the table of ISTEP scores. Last year, the percentage of students
meeting standards in both language arts and mathematics declined from 72
percent to 61 percent at Lost Creek, and from 65 percent to 41 percent at
Meadows. This year, both schools
declined again -- even though 3rd grade scores in Vigo County jumped this year
and passed state averages. Why isn't
anyone studying what happened to the Warren, Meadows, and Lost Creek
children? And how can we justify
repeating this experiment on our children at Crawford, Farrington Grove, and
Sugar Grove until we have the answer?
Numerous educational research studies in the last fifteen
years have consistently indicated that educational outcomes are better for
at-risk children in small schools. None
of these studies would consider 464 students at Farrington Grove to be a small
school. Did you know Farrington Grove
has the fifth highest free lunch percentage in the corporation before the
Crawford students are added! These are
at-risk children!
Please consider how these results about small schools apply
to the former Warren students, to the current Crawford and Farrington Grove
students, and to the Franklin students who deserve better facilities -- but not
a larger school population that research indicates would have a detrimental
effect on their education. Award-winning
schools like Dixie Bee and Rio Grande work well for the populations they serve,
but this research indicates they would not work well for at-risk students. Lost Creek worked well for its original
population. How are the former Warren
students doing there?
It has been a privilege to address the board of one of the
finest school corporations in the State of Indiana. Our many successful schools and programs are testimony to
excellent leadership and dedicated teachers and staff. But even excellent institutions sometimes
make mistakes. Remember how the
Coca-Cola Company changed the most popular soft drink in the world to introduce
"New Coke?" It was the answer
to the question, "How can we keep seven out of ten people from choosing
Pepsi over Coke in Pepsi's advertising?"
Really great institutions are able to admit their mistakes
and return to the best course of action.
Within months of introducing "New Coke," Coca-Cola went back
to the old formula. It was the answer
to the question, "How can we maintain and increase our lead in product
sales, revenues, and profits?"
Coca-Cola continues to be the number one soft drink company in the world
today.
The Crawford School Study is an answer to the question,
"How can we attempt to justify closing Crawford School?"
I believe this school corporation is great enough to put
this study aside, and instead to answer the question, "How can we provide
the best possible education for the children of Vigo County in a cost-effective
manner?"
Please consider the interests of our community's children
when you make the decision on Crawford School.
Thank you.