Moffat v. U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Corporation, 551 So2d 592 (1989).  A 7 year old bicyclist riding home from school was struck by an automobile.  He was riding on a bridge built with a segregated pathway for pedestrians and bicyclists.  There was a drainage grate on one portion of the pathway with parallel slots large enough to trap bicycle tires.  From the opinion:  "Allegedly, the boy was aware of the grate and chose to ride in the active lanes of automobile traffic on the bridge in order to avoid the danger of the grate.  The accident occurred while he was avoiding the risk created by the grate.

"Mrs. Moffat alleges that U.S. Foundry designed, manufactured, and marketed the grate.  She also alleges that U.S. Foundry was aware of the danger of its grates.  She even attaches, as an exhibit to the third amended complaint, an advertisement from a company which sold a guard to eliminate the danger created by the slots in such drainage grates.  U.S. Foundry allegedly knew that its grates would be installed in areas where bicycles and automobiles were operated in close proximity to each other, and that it was foreseeable that a bicyclist could be injured by an automobile while avoiding the risk of an accident on a grate.

"Mrs. Moffat sued U.S. Foundry for both negligence and strict liability.  She also sued the automobile driver, the corporations which designed and constructed the bridge, and Pinellas County.  The trial court dismissed only U.S. Foundry."  That dismissal was reversed and remanded.
Home
Disclaimer
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1