(Continued from page 1)

is not a historic structure and its constructed of concrete block.
The landlord indicates that aside from a few more parking spots to be created, a good chunk of the cleared space would simply become green space.
While I have no particular objection to the Camp Canine demolition plan, I was not happy with the way the facts were presented last night at the General Meeting.  So I thought I'd take this opportunity to explain the general considerations in a matter like this, simply as a learning experience.  (I love learning about how things really work, and I'm assuming that you do to,)
Molly Hughes emailed a response to the October presentation, "I am familiar with situations like this one, where the Site Plan Applicant (for the [Camp] Canine site, in this case) has requested a Change in Use (from, say, service station to, say, animal care), but has more existing building (square feet) on the site than the site can "park" on-site (without site changes) at the new use's parking rate.  (Usually, this problem is discovered during the site purchaser's due diligence, and the price of the land purchase is discounted if the site's parking is insufficient for most uses that would typically be