http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/independent/d/index.htm
Status of tibet 's environment:
http://www.sierraclub.org/human-rights/china/tibet.asp
l http://www.psrg.lcs.mit.edu/~sheldon/tibet/tibet.bib.txt
In 1960, the Dalai Lama called the first democratic elections for a newly created representative body, the Commission of People's Deputies. A year later he announced the outline for a new democratic constitution, and on 10 March 1963, the Dalai Lama promulgated the 'Constitution of Tibet,' an instrument combining principles of Buddhism with popular democracy. http://www.tibet.com/Resolution/icj59.html
3. International Commission of Jurists . "The Question of Tibet and the Rule of Law." Geneva : 1959.
In addition, the Mongol/Tibet relationship was certainly not one of conqueror and conquered
“explotative Han Taoist Devilry ed – rather the Late Miedeval Yuan had Tibet more as a protectorate
and with ongoing ties that did not become severed after the demise of the Yuan dynasty.
The ming had no confirmation titled urns to draw lots for chaperone ambans or false Gyankein norbu's in the Kashag.”
Even if we accept the claim based on the Khan, surely the following is a more accurate analysis.:
1. foreign power - the Mongols - subdues China and other nations 2. The Mongol regime is overthrown in China and an “indigenous” dynasty is established - conquered nations are once more out of subjugation by the Mongols - why is Tibet now part of China as result ? and Mongolia, inner and outer Mongolia which both should be independant
as Greater mongolia. (Pax Mongolica)
(MING = The Great Withdrawal), mengtzu (Mencius) 1388 - 1644 - 1649, Wu San Gui
British Opium Wars and Portegeuse Sailing Junk Ship's in kenya, and Giraiffe's in Ming Zoos.
3. The Manchu - again a foreign power - establish the last dynasty in China . http://groups.google.com/groups?q=thomaswheat+kangxi%27s+maxim&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=57cf3dba.0212091305.6496bbde%40posting.google.com&rnum=1
Evidence for just subjugation and domionioniship by the CCP in Tibet is scant.
The ruling powers of Tibet request military assistance Suzerainity, and
Choyon.= priest - patron relationship.
which is provided by the Manchu, Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) with the fall of the Manchu the oppressed regions of China , Mongolia , dzongkhar's? Urghur region of Xinjiang (Manchu dominated after miltary campaigns funded by the British to prevent Russian expansion during the Great Game years) sought to once more expres their national identities 5. Mao advocated self-deternination but quickly reneged and annexed Tibet , Mongolia and
East Turkestan ( Xianjiang ) The Unsettled West Joshua Kurlantzick From Foreign Affairs, July/August 2004 Xinjiang: China 's Muslim Borderland. Edited by S. Frederick Starr. New York : M. E. Sharpe, 2004, 528 pp. $89.95
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0765613182/qid=1096540906/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-8111810-2527119?v=glance&s=books Excuse me ignoramus. My article was only attempting to prove that there was no link between Al qaeda and Xinjiang Seperatists. The CCP is using Bush's infamous 'War on Terror' as an excuse to crack down on Xinjiang dissadents and labeling them as conspirators and partners with Al qaeda. If you had read the article you would see that the article dispels that myth and chronicles 50 years of repression in xinjiang by the CCP. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=thomaswheat+xinjiang&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT-8&safe=off&selm=57cf3dba.0407080941.72800bb6%40posting.google.com&rnum=2 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=f0abc8cb.0406230043.fb16e01%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dthomaswheat%2Bxinjiang%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26safe%3Doff%26selm%3Df0abc8cb.0406230043.fb16e01%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D1 Dhondup78] Dhondup, K., "Panchen Lama, the Enigmatic Tibetan," _Tibetan Review_, Feb-March 1978, pp. 13-17 [Lui88] Liu Shengqi, "The Making of Modern Tibet," _Beijing Review_, Jan. 4-10, 1988, pp. 43-46 [Walt1]
Walt van Praag, Michael C. van. _The Status of Tibet: History, Rights and Prospects in International Law_, Boulder , 1987, p. 79.
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/conclusion/index.html http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&threadm=9d383769.0312130938.706c5cbd%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dthomaswheat
%2Btibet%2Bsimla%2Bconference
%2B1914%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26safe%3Doff%26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D9d383769.0312130938.706c5cbd%2540posting.google.com%26rnum%3D1 “Dear Ltlee I believe you are mistaken. On your first point I would say that Tibetan Nationalism is not racist though some aspects of Han nationalism may very well be. You are saying that it is racist for a group of people that have inhabitated a specific geographic region and one time an indepependant state to have views or have people who support them by calling for a truly autonomous Tibet and not a dumping ground for Han colonists. Would you call the native americans racist for wanting only their ethnicity to inhabit traditional tribal lands? I dont think so, since you and your cohorts have mythologized and eulogized the Noble savage myth to justify your exploitative treatment of Tibetans.
Read the rest of this message... (28 more lines)
” a.) The Simla conference:
illustrates that Tibet has been prepared to accept solutions short of full independence.
Under the terms of the proposed Agreement Tibet was ready to accept Chinese suzerainty
in return for local and National tripartite prefecturial autonomy.
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/index.html
Duress invalidates a forged sea for Han Amban
Deng - Mao's Seventeen-Point Agreement Of 1951 Is Absolutely Void Under International Law
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/independent/b/index.html --------------------------------------------
Both parties agree that the PLA
(Hutchinson Whampoa, Lee Kaisheng, Panama Canal, US 5th Fleet, 7th fleet)
Judicialwatch.org
had already occupied large parts of Tibet, first invading Amdo, Chamdo, then Szcheuan Kham,
before and during then Utsang before Mao and deng could rubberstamp neocolonialism in Tibet by the time the
17 point 'Agreement' was signed
in 1951. Moreover, China threatened the negotiators with further use of force in a military advance to Lhasa-- if they refused to sign . Therefore, the 'Agreement' is absolutely void and provides no support for any claim by the PRC to sovereignty over Tibet . Changan: 57,000
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/independent/c/index.html#1
Kaifeng,
Francis Xavier
Ippolito Desideri: “ Gusri Khan continued as 'Dharma King' (a primarily military function) until his death in
1655. The Manchu's had very little influence in Tibet in the 17th century.
After his death, the Fifth Dalai Lama assumed complete control of temporal affairs in Tibet and ruled without any
outside interference. Also, despite the presence of the so-called 'kings' of Tibet , punitative successors to Gusri Khan,
the Dalai Lama's wielded all the actual power, and the 'Dharma Kings' served under the Dalai Lamas.
Thus, a Jesuit living in Tibet early in the eighteenth century said of the Seventh Dalai Lama and his government:
'The hierarchy existing in Thibet is not secular but superior to all temporal and regular government.
Head of all is the Grand Lama of Thibet.... He rules not only over religious, but over temporal matters,
as he is really the absolute master of all Thibet.' A more succinct description of the effective exercise of
sovereignty
can scarcely be imagined.”
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/independent/c/index.html#3
http://www.tibetjustice.org/reports/sovereignty/independent/c/index.html#4
-------------------------------------------------------------------
LDP MITI DP Green peace Dockin US 7th fleet in Taipei, Hong Kong
(Taiwan Chop Shop Aesthetics Kangxi, Yongzhen, Qianlong), (Shokutu, early middle ages Constitutional law
U2 Cash My Checkers, to Dominoes in Diesal and Dust in KMT - CCP China lobby arms gate reactionarianism. )