HISTORYAT A GLANCE |
THE SAFAVIDS
(1501-1722)(Part 1.)
The Safavids were leaders of a militant Sufi
order. They traced their ancestry to Shaykh Safi ad Din (died circa 1334), the
founder of their order, who claimed descent from Shia Islam's Seventh Imam, Musa
al Kazim. From their home base in Ardabil, they recruited followers among the
Turkoman tribesmen of Anatolia and forged them into an effective fighting force
and an instrument for territorial expansion. Sometime in the mid-fifteenth
century, the Safavids adopted Shia Islam, and their movement became highly
millenarian in character. In 1501, under their leader Ismail, the Safavids
seized power in Tabriz, which became their capital. Ismail was proclaimed shah
of Iran. The rise of the Safavids marks the reemergence in Iran of a powerful
central authority within geographical boundaries attained by former Iranian
empires. The Safavids declared Shia Islam the state religion and used
proselytizing and force to convert the large majority of Muslims in Iran to the
Shia sect. Under the early Safavids, Iran was a theocracy in which state and
religion were closely intertwined. Ismail's followers venerated him not only as
the murshid-kamil, the perfect guide, but also as an emanation of the Godhead.
He combined in his person both temporal and spiritual authority. In the new
state, he was represented in both these functions by the vakil, an official who
acted as a kind of alter ego. The sadr headed the powerful religious
organization; the vizier, the bureaucracy; and the amir alumara, the fighting
forces. These fighting forces, the qizilbash, came primarily from the seven
Turkic-speaking tribes that supported the Safavid bid for power.
The Safavids faced the problem of integrating their Turkic-speaking followers
with the native Iranians, their fighting traditions with the Iranian
bureaucracy, and their messianic ideology with the exigencies of administering a
territorial state. The institutions of the early Safavid state and subsequent
efforts at state reorganization reflect attempts, not always successful, to
strike a balance among these various elements. The Safavids also faced external
challenges from the Uzbeks and the Ottomans. The Uzbeks were an unstable element
along Iran's northeastern frontier who raided into Khorasan, particularly when
the central government was weak, and blocked the Safavid advance northward into
Transoxiana. The Ottomans, who were Sunnis, were rivals for the religious
allegiance of Muslims in eastern Anatolia and Iraq and pressed territorial
claims in both these areas and in the Caucasus.
The Safavid Empire received a blow that was to prove fatal in 1524, when the
Ottoman sultan Selim I defeated the Safavid forces at Chaldiran and occupied the
Safavid capital, Tabriz. Although he was forced to withdraw because of the harsh
winter and Iran's scorched earth policy, and although Safavid rulers continued
to assert claims to spiritual leadership, the defeat shattered belief in the
shah as a semidivine figure and weakened the hold of the shah over the qizilbash
chiefs. In 1533 the Ottoman sultan S�leyman occupied Baghdad and then extended
Ottoman rule to southern Iraq. Except for a brief period (1624-38) when Safavid
rule was restored, Iraq remained firmly in Ottoman hands. The Ottomans also
continued to challenge the Safavids for control of Azarbaijan and the Caucasus
until the Treaty of Qasr-e Shirin in 1639 established frontiers both in Iraq and
in the Caucasus that remain virtually unchanged in the late twentieth century.
The Safavid state reached its apogee during the reign of Shah Abbas
(1587-1629). The shah gained breathing space to confront and defeat the Uzbeks
by signing a largely disadvantageous treaty with the Ottomans. He then fought
successful campaigns against the Ottomans, reestablishing Iranian control over
Iraq, Georgia, and parts of the Caucasus. He counterbalanced the power of the
qizilbash by creating a body of troops composed of Georgian and Armenian slaves
who were loyal to the person of the shah. He extended state and crown lands and
the provinces directly administered by the state, at the expense of the
qizilbash chiefs. He relocated tribes to weaken their power, strengthened the
bureaucracy, and further centralized the administration.
NEXT
BACK
HOME