Guardian Unlimited
Login
Go to:  
SocietyGuardian.co.uk
Home Health Housing Regeneration Local government Voluntary sector Social care Talk
Jobs Careers Policy Conferences Glossary Big issues Comment Help

Homelessness

  Search this site

 Recent articles
Beggars feel Dickensian chill

Missing links

Council support for homeless families branded inadequate

Letter: How to give

Erwin James: A life inside

Dash of inspiration

Letters: Begging for help

Analysis: the changing face of fighting homelessness

My day as a homeless shelter volunteer

Nicola Bacon: Whose crisis at Christmas?

Homelessness

'Cut number of homeless charities,' says Crisis chief

Matt Weaver
Friday February 15, 2002


The number of homeless charities should be slashed, according to one of the most senior figures in housing, who resigned this week as chairman of the rough sleepers charity Crisis over its decision not to merge with Shelter.

Speaking for the first time since his resignation, David Edmonds said: "There are too many homeless charities, given the nature of the problem."

According to the government's rough sleepers unit there are only 270 rough sleepers in London and 530 in England as a whole. And yet there are 130 homeless charities operating in London alone.

Mr Edmonds, who is the director general of the telecommunication watchdog Oftel and former chief executive of the housing corporation, said: "Street homelessness is now a very, very marginal issue indeed. I didn't think we needed both Shelter and Crisis".

He claimed there was a need for a national organisation campaigning on wider issues such as the increase in the number of families housed in bed and breakfast hotels, rather than rough sleeping.

Crisis chief executive Shaks Ghosh said the merger talks broke down because Crisis felt that "diversity is the best way of helping homeless people".

Mr Edmonds disagreed. He said: "I prefer focus rather than diversity. The focus that Shelter and Crisis combined could have brought to bear would have been much sharper."

He added: "I felt that the sum of the parts of both organisations would be much stronger than the organisations remaining divided."

He also revealed how close the two organisations had come to a merger. He said they had almost reached an agreement on the formation of a new board before Crisis rejected the idea.

Mr Edmonds' fellow trustees pulled out over fears that Shelter would become the dominant player in the new organisation.

Mr Edmonds said: "There was growing anxiety on the part of some trustees that the Crisis ethos would get lost in a large organisation. I did not happen to agree with that. I was among a small minority on the board by the end."

 Talk about it
David Walker and Shaks Ghosh live online

 Related articles
12.02.2002: Crisis halts merger talks between homeless charities
12.02.2002: Help the homeless charity sector
04.07.2001: Shelter and Crisis follow the fashion with merger talks
24.12.2001: Letters: No place to lay their heads
24.11.2001: Rough sleepers unit 'is fixing figures'
01.11.2001: Analysis: The homelessness industry
13.08.2001: Shelter's response to rough sleeping figures
04.08.2001: Casey on brink of meeting rough sleepers target
04.07.2001: Hopes rise for early move on homelessness bill
04.07.2001: Shelter and Crisis follow the fashion with merger talks
12.04.2001: Rough sleepers tsar sweeps ahead with targets
01.01.2001: Charity 'wrong' over winter homeless crisis
06.12.2000: Campaign targets homeless over-50s
30.11.2000: Capital's homeless problem is getting worse
23.08.2000: Big reduction in number of rough sleepers
23.08.2000: Rough sleepers are only the tip of the iceberg
13.10.1999: Homeless need a `fourth emergency service'

 Big issue
Homelessness

 Useful sites
Shelter
Crisis
Rough sleepers unit






Printable version | Send it to a friend | Read it later | See saved stories



UP

SocietyGuardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2002
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1