|
Group Riding Is NOT Playing
'Follow The Leader'
I
have heard it argued by some who prefer not to ride in groups that
group riding is no more than playing 'follow the leader'. And
since most of us that ride big bikes are far from being simply
followers, group riding is for 'the other guys'.
Well,
I have no problem with people preferring to ride solo. But if the
concept of group riding is generally thought to be simply playing
'follow the leader', I'd like to correct that impression
immediately.
When
you join a group ride you do agree to be led by a lead bike and to
be shepherded by a drag bike. You agree that you will station-keep
(maintain proper spacing and a staggered formation). And you agree
that you will adopt the 'prime directive' (never hit the bike in
front of you).
Sounds
like 'follow the leader' to me, too. But there is more. You, for
example, agree to follow the lead bike UNLESS IT IS INTO DANGER.
You agree to rely solely on yourself to determine that a lane
change is safe for you to perform. You agree, in other words, to
be responsible for your own safety. This is what is meant by the
often heard admonition to 'ride your own ride!'
In
other words, riding in a group is more than being a passive
component. It involves being an ACTIVE participant.
Lest
you think this is a trivial 'nit pick' and that despite the above
you are nevertheless still just following the leader, let me
describe a few situations that might change your mind.
Yesterday
a group of 7 people on 5 bikes went out for a short (150 mile)
ride together. One of the people was a newbie to the group and to
group riding. We explained what our concept of group riding
entails, and he had received a copy of our group riding guidelines
document the week before. Because there was a new rider in the
group we started out very conservatively.
That
is, our lead bike decided to place the new person in the slot
immediately in front of me (riding drag) and when we got to a
freeway he kept the group in the right-most lane. This was done to
give me an opportunity to gauge the skills of the new rider before
we increased our speed and moved left.
What
I observed was that this person had fine control of his bike, but
he was clearly anxious about being in the right lane (as was I.)
There was rather a lot of merging traffic before we got out of
town.
Someone
in the group who was equally anxious said on the CB: "Hey,
Harry, I have it on good authority that there are 2 more lanes on
this freeway." Harry (our lead bike) responded by asking me
to secure a lane to the left. I did so and the group moved to the
left.
So?
So one of the 'followers' changed the behavior of the group! He
took an active role and asked, in his own fashion, for the group
to move out of the slow lane.
[Had
the newbie been having any trouble with highway speed or with
control of his bike in any other way I would have vetoed the lane
change and asked for an exit lane instead. The drag bike has a lot
of discretion in our groups.] Taking an active role is expected of
our riders! And not just to change some group behavior to accommodate
a personal desire. Each rider in our group is expected to look out
for the interests of the other riders as well.
Another
example from yesterday. Elaine and I separated from the rest of
the group as the ride came to an end. We rode our two bikes
together through some unfamiliar back country roads that had
essentially no traffic on them. We traveled at speeds of from 60
to 70 MPH most of the time, so long as conditions were favorable.
Elaine
has led groups for in excess of 50,000 miles over the past 8 years
and is very good at it. When we approach unfamiliar curves she
does not push the envelope, especially when there are others in
the group besides just the two of us. It is not unusual, however,
for her to take a marked curve at from 10 to 20 MPH above posted
advisory speed limits. (If a sign says that the speed of a curve
is 45 MPH, Elaine and I will usually take it about 60 MPH.)
Last
night we were traveling at about 70 MPH when I noticed that we
were about to enter a curve that was posted at 20MPH!!! Elaine had
looked down at her instrument panel and had not noticed the sign
at all. There is no way in the world that Elaine would try to take
that curve at 70 MPH. So, I announced that 'this one is 20!' on
the CB and she hit her binders and brought her bike down to about
30 MPH before she entered the curve. I hasten to add that the
curve was not visible at all before I made my announcement, at
least to me. Elaine had seen the first set of left-pointing arrows
indicating that she was approaching a curve, but had no idea that
it was such a slow one. We both made it through the curve without
incident.
What's
the message here? I took an ACTIVE role and warned her about the
speed of the curve ahead. In other words, all riders in a group
are expected to look out for everybody else. Elaine may have been
the lead bike at the time, but if I had simply been a passive
rider 'following the leader', both of us would have ended up on
the side of the road waiting for a life-flight helicopter, or
worse.
Being
in a group provides everyone with many extra pairs of eyes, extra
minds to deal with situations others are not prepared to deal
with, help in the event of problems, and a community of informed
judgement makers. To think that any of the group would fail to be
active when the need arose is out of the question. To think that
anyone in our group of riding friends would have failed to warn
Elaine about the speed of the curve ahead is simply nuts. None of
use will follow a lead bike into danger - but more importantly,
none of us would allow a lead bike to enter danger without trying
to prevent it. ACTIVE roles for all.
Return
to
|